Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Edwardo Piet]

I don't really "hate" anyone I just use that word sometimes... I just mean he gets on my nerves and I find him rather unlikable. I couldn't watch one of his shows without his personality completely ruining the enjoyment of the show for me.

If he was rude but funny I could bare him. But I just find him rude and very unfunny - I find him too pompous to be funny. Smug git. He seems to think he's funny - it makes him so unfunny.

Now this is funny: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syRQ7iShpzY

[houseofcantor]

I don't really "hate" anyone I just use that word sometimes... I just mean he gets on my nerves and I find him rather unlikable. I couldn't watch one of his shows without his personality completely ruining the enjoyment of the show for me.

He's artiste. Ain't exactly doable without colossal ego.

I'm not arguing against you not watching, I'm just arguing 'cause I get argumentative.

[Edwardo Piet]

He's artiste. Ain't exactly doable without colossal ego.

Are you calling my very awesome very humble artist brother egotistical?

[houseofcantor]

He's artiste. Ain't exactly doable without colossal ego.

Are you calling my very awesome very humble artist brother egotistical?

Maybe.

If he's in the public eye, definitely. 

[Losty]

This color looks purple to me enrico

You probably right Los.
I am in need of a wife that can help me to distinguish the pink from purple.
Would you marry me?      

Only if you promise to stop using the bunny ears D:

[houseofcantor]

You probably right Los.
I am in need of a wife that can help me to distinguish the pink from purple.
Would you marry me?      

Only if you promise to stop using the bunny ears D:

You are such a troublemaker.

[Losty]

Only if you promise to stop using the bunny ears D:

You are such a troublemaker.

It's my divine purpose in life. If I claim religious reasons then anyone who mocks me or tries to stop me is a filthy filthy bigot.

[Little Rik]

I would have thought that a yogini like you would have a better memory.
About a year ago or so you post similar garbage.
In that instance i explained why AM has such a bad name and considering that your memory fail you i try to help you once again.
In the late 60 and 70 the Indira Gandhi corrupted gov. ask Sarkar to forget about his PROUT political agenda that would put an end to corruption in India.
They said to him.......teach as much yoga and spirituality as much as you like but forget about PROUT.
Sarkar said no and it is here that all trouble started.
Sarkar was accused of several crimes never committed and soon after Indira Gandhi declare a state of emergency better known as the dictatorship of Indira Gandhi.
Not happy with that she order the imprisonment of Sarkar and ask all countries where AM was active to consider AM as a terrorist organisation.
Here in Australia Asio and the security services even organised the Hilton bombing which serve two purposes. One was to please the corrupted dictatorship of Indira Gandhi and the other was to convince the people that there was a problem with terrorism so in this way the security services got more power.
People died and innocent people end up in jail but of course the interests of these criminals came first.
The media got information from these criminals and gullible people like you and the nutter believe what is written in the paper.
Go ahead and keep on posting this garbage if you like.
All you do is getting more and more bad karma.
Oh, by the way, do you know what happen to Indira Gandhi and her son?
Indira was gunned down by her Sikh body guard and her son was blown in pieces by a Tamil suicide bomber.
It appear that when the bad karma get out of control like in the case of the Gandhi family the reactions come very fast indeed.  

What does this have to do with the price of tea in China?  You asked for evidence that Sarkar borrowed from Hinduism.  I provided it and you respond with this rant.  If you could try to stay on point it would be appreciated.

I already reply you but you keep on pretending that it never happen.
Sarkar always keep well away from all Hindu dogmas and considering that Hinduism is based mainly on dogmas there is almost nothing that unite AM with Hinduism.
The caste system.
The dowry that has got to be paid by the bride.
The sacred cow.
The mantra.
The many Gods.
The untouchability.
If you really think that Sarkar took from Hinduism then you can also say that Sarkar took from any other religions.
They all believe in God, they all preach peace and fraternity and so many other things.
Sorry yog but you are really sinking deep in the gutter of stupidity.  

[Homeless Nutter]

Yeah, whatever you say, Hindu cultist...

[Little Rik]

You probably right Los.
I am in need of a wife that can help me to distinguish the pink from purple.
Would you marry me?      

Only if you promise to stop using the bunny ears D:

You ask me a big big sacrifice.
The bunny to me has got a very big meaning but if you ask me i have no choice but listen to you.
Is ok. if i start using   ?