Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 30, 2024, 4:57 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What would you consider to be evidence for God?
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
There can be no evidence for God, he's unfalsifiable.

If he "appeared before us" he could easily be an alien.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
He could also easily be The One True Turtle in disguise.

IOW one of my incarnations.

I.e. : Me.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(November 16, 2015 at 7:55 am)Evie Wrote: He could also easily be The One True Turtle in disguise.

IOW one of my incarnations.

I.e. : Me.

maybe you are God evie theres a religion that believes God is manifested in all humans and so as God you can incarnate anything anytime Smile
Imagine there's no heaven It's easy if you try No hell below us Above us only sky Imagine all the people Living for today   FSM Grin   Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Imagine all the people Living life in peace You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you will join us And the world will be as one  - John Lennon

The easy confidence with which I know another man's religion is folly teaches me to suspect that my own is also  - Mark Twain
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
There is no "maybe" about it. I told you: I am The One True Turtle. I am TOTT. Now bow to TOTT. Get on your knees for TOTT. Now s- *area-69 content omitted*


Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
If you think about, there wouldn't be anything without God's existence; no matter, energy, information, or mind (bad case of naiveté to believe mindless molecules all of a sudden had a first thought). What was that first thought by the way? (perhaps, it was "Let's get this show on the road"). But of course, a first brain would be required before the first thought; not sure how that would work ... a brain developed without any thought, oh boy. Now, the cartoons and the Santa Clause/Magic-man comparisons are going to be paraded out; maybe that was the first thought and materialist haven't evolved beyond that.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(November 28, 2015 at 11:34 pm)snowtracks Wrote: (bad case of naiveté to believe mindless molecules all of a sudden had a first thought)

But is that not exactly what you believe? POOF! Intelligent god.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
Poof! Human. What was absolutely nothing a second ago all of a sudden has an intelligent thought.

These silly false claims about how science works are always much more valid criticisms of the religious view, which is just "Tadah! Magic!"

"Evolution claims that the human eye just popped into existence fully formed!"

"No, you claim that."
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
If you want evidence that is not reaffirmed by god himself, or proven by science and whatnot, here;

If an alien civilization made contact with us and once we could communicate, somewhere down the road ended up reaffirming a previous god of a religion in history.

Not only would this be evidence for god, but it would establish one religion that could be true, because for them to reaffirm this, god would have had to interact with them as well, as that is indisputable coorelation.

However, this will not happen, it is a hypothetical for a reason.
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?

Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(November 29, 2015 at 4:32 am)robvalue Wrote: Poof! Human. What was absolutely nothing a second ago all of a sudden has an intelligent thought.

These silly false claims about how science works are always much more valid criticisms of the religious view, which is just "Tadah! Magic!"

"Evolution claims that the human eye just popped into existence fully formed!"

"No, you claim that."
Not how 'science works', but how nature works.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Reply
RE: What would you consider to be evidence for God?
(December 1, 2015 at 8:14 pm)snowtracks Wrote: Not how 'science works', but how nature works.

Nature =/= god.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dear Atheists: what would convince you God/Christ is Real? JJoseph 209 13874 June 12, 2024 at 10:54 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  If you learned that the god of [insert religion] is real, would all bets be off? Sicnoo0 59 5247 June 12, 2024 at 10:38 pm
Last Post: Prycejosh1987
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 2781 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  When were the Gospels Written? The External and Internal Evidence. Nishant Xavier 62 3683 August 6, 2023 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Veridical NDEs: Evidence/Proof of the Soul and the After-Life? Nishant Xavier 32 1836 August 6, 2023 at 5:36 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 5296 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Conscience and the Moral Argument as Evidence for the Goodness of God. Nishant Xavier 162 9104 July 9, 2023 at 7:53 am
Last Post: Deesse23
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 3131 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1103 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Can you consider Atheism an ethnicity UniverseCaptain 31 3066 September 27, 2021 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: UniverseCaptain



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)