Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 22, 2024, 5:40 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rule Change (New Staff Power)
#11
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
This sounds sensible to me. Upholding the rights of someone skirting around the rules but wrecking every thread they go in is less of a priority than stopping that disruption in my opinion. I think you guys are very reasonable.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#12
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
(January 12, 2016 at 5:40 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: I think it is a good idea and so long as staff continue to be of the high caliber we're used to I'm confident it would only be used when someone fairly deranged comes along who poisons every thread he touches.  I'd prefer that there be a safety valve like this to prevent staff from being run into the ground dealing with endless annoyance from such an individual.

It is striking how a single random person can poison the atmosphere and mood of the entire forum and make everyone miserable - I've seen it here a couple of times now to varying degrees, and it is not pretty. Remember the going-ons around the time when Tibs shut the forum down for a while (allegedly for technical reasons Smile ), man everyone was pissed, staff was on strike, and I even left for a while because I didn't want to deal with the perpetual downers here. Better have some good leverage to keep everything going smoothly and without pain and suffering.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#13
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
[Image: unlimited-power.gif]



Angel
[Image: rySLj1k.png]

If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Reply
#14
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
I think this is fair: Balancing the concerns of many against the posting privileges of one -- with one question.

Question: Would this option be susceptible to member reporting, or will it only be an option brought out by Staff in their thread?

Reply
#15
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
[Image: MOTUCFGHCCVR4x6SOL.111537.jpg?1450447670]
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#16
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
(January 12, 2016 at 6:05 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Question: Would this option be susceptible to member reporting, or will it only be an option brought out by Staff in their thread?

Good question.

It will be an internal staff discussion. The report feature is there to report rule violations. We don't want reports for non-violations where members are suggesting that we invoke the Nuclear Option. That would be bad, I think.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
#17
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
(January 12, 2016 at 6:12 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:
(January 12, 2016 at 6:05 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Question: Would this option be susceptible to member reporting, or will it only be an option brought out by Staff in their thread?

Good question.

It will be an internal staff discussion. The report feature is there to report rule violations. We don't want reports for non-violations where members are suggesting that we invoke the Nuclear Option. That would be bad, I think.

I certainly agree, thanks for the answer.

Reply
#18
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
[Image: 1008-mom-bathroom-v3.jpg?quality=0.8]
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#19
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
[Image: 122224d1178138391-what-if-ban-him.jpg]
Reply
#20
RE: Rule Change (New Staff Power)
All for it, good addition. However, can't believe you besmirched nuclear's good name that way. For shame!
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Information Staff Log - Bannings, Reports, and Other Actions Darwinian 3505 910994 9 hours ago
Last Post: arewethereyet
  PSA: Added to threats rule arewethereyet 10 4074 July 13, 2024 at 3:12 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  New Staff Moderator The Valkyrie 20 2997 December 30, 2023 at 8:25 am
Last Post: no one
  PSA: Hate Speech, rule 7 arewethereyet 24 4069 September 21, 2023 at 7:14 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  PSA: Update to necroposting rule arewethereyet 51 9548 April 3, 2023 at 2:33 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  PSA: The Necroposting Rule BrianSoddingBoru4 42 8942 April 6, 2022 at 3:03 pm
Last Post: brewer
  PSA - Clarification of rule #3 on doxxing. arewethereyet 18 4966 November 17, 2021 at 5:11 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Staff Changes BrianSoddingBoru4 32 8106 November 23, 2020 at 10:45 pm
Last Post: Rhizomorph13
  [Serious] Proposing A Rule Change BrianSoddingBoru4 24 5935 June 11, 2020 at 11:30 pm
Last Post: Ranjr
  The "Report" button, and how not to treat your staff. Jackalope 71 30994 February 9, 2020 at 1:50 pm
Last Post: brewer



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)