Posts: 7
Threads: 0
Joined: January 22, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 22, 2016 at 6:08 am
(January 13, 2016 at 12:26 pm)Iroscato Wrote: (January 13, 2016 at 11:39 am)bennyboy Wrote: I've heard about this, but Korea doesn't have this problem. I'm running 500 Mbit (so 62.5Mbyte) speeds, though in reality I rarely get over about 40 megabytes / sec for long. But the nice thing is I can do this all day, 24/7, all month and they DON'T CARE. No limits, no throttling. Nada. Just porn porn porn until my hard drive explodes.
Giggity.
Just thought I'd share...at this point I would NEVER EVER voluntarily live some place that doesn't have google fiber.
Posts: 4705
Threads: 38
Joined: April 5, 2015
Reputation:
65
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 22, 2016 at 6:11 am
(January 22, 2016 at 6:08 am)an0nemus Wrote: (January 13, 2016 at 12:26 pm)Iroscato Wrote: Giggity.
Just thought I'd share...at this point I would NEVER EVER voluntarily live some place that doesn't have google fiber.
Sweet lawd above...
If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 22, 2016 at 6:22 am
Oh my god. MARRY ME!!
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Posts: 10470
Threads: 165
Joined: May 29, 2013
Reputation:
53
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 22, 2016 at 7:24 am
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2016 at 7:24 am by c172.)
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Posts: 4705
Threads: 38
Joined: April 5, 2015
Reputation:
65
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 22, 2016 at 7:43 am
My work connection:
I'll do my home one later, it'll probably be slightly higher.
If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
46
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 22, 2016 at 10:18 am
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2016 at 10:19 am by bennyboy.)
(January 22, 2016 at 6:08 am)an0nemus Wrote: (January 13, 2016 at 12:26 pm)Iroscato Wrote: Giggity.
Just thought I'd share...at this point I would NEVER EVER voluntarily live some place that doesn't have google fiber.
Outstanding! I don't think anyone's going to beat this for a couple of years, since most motherboards' LAN cards are gigabit cards, and the little bit you lost from true gigabit was just overhead-- probably on the server side.
So what's the cost, and is it unlimited?
What I really want to know is-- how tf did this ISP only earn 4.5 stars? Are they reserving 5.0 for direct NASA satellite links or something?
Posts: 7
Threads: 0
Joined: January 22, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 22, 2016 at 10:27 am
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2016 at 10:30 am by an0nemus.
Edit Reason: add an anecdote, who doesn't like anecdotes.
)
(January 22, 2016 at 10:18 am)bennyboy Wrote: (January 22, 2016 at 6:08 am)an0nemus Wrote:
Just thought I'd share...at this point I would NEVER EVER voluntarily live some place that doesn't have google fiber.
Outstanding! I don't think anyone's going to beat this for a couple of years, since most motherboards' LAN cards are gigabit cards, and the little bit you lost from true gigabit was just overhead-- probably on the server side.
So what's the cost, and is it unlimited?
What I really want to know is-- how tf did this ISP only earn 4.5 stars? Are they reserving 5.0 for direct NASA satellite links or something?
It appears to be unlimited, in 'words' as well as 'deeds'. I download/stream a LOT of content (I haven't had any kind of pay television in 15 years ...probably more). Never any 'nasty grams', nor 'slow traffic'.
I pay about 70 bucks a month, which was cheaper than Time Warner's deal.
The only reason I think they're 4.5 stars is that Google is my ISP and people complain "they're looking at everything you're doing....and going to monetize it".
My response to that "at that speed for that price....I'll keep a paper log for them while I'm at it..."
Also, I'll add if I was only a light user of internet (ie browsing, email, facebook (uhg)) this speed would be overkill. About a month or so ago I had to reset my equipment because my downloads off of steam were 'slow', and I was /only/ getting 99 mb/s. Browsing/emailing I never noticed it.
Posts: 9147
Threads: 83
Joined: May 22, 2013
Reputation:
46
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 22, 2016 at 8:06 pm
Yeah, these speeds really change what you can do with the internet. For one thing, cloud computing essentially become an extended hard drive. At that price, I'd say that's a fantastic service. I know I can get true megabit in Korea as well, but I'm not sure the price. $70 with true unlimited sounds extremely competitive, though.
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 26, 2016 at 8:33 am
(January 13, 2016 at 5:39 am)Aractus Wrote: OH MY GOD.
My line rate is 74267/25921 kbit/s, I've never seen it that high before. And I just clocked my net on Speedtest at 69 Mbit/s!!
Okay so a few days ago I did beat this line rate, slightly, by plugging into the phone port in the hallway. My plan at this stage is to re-wire it in the next few days (it still has 1970's wiring going to the No. 238 socket, with a RJ11 daisy chained from it) and hopefully get a better line rate.
I also successfully hit my 1000GB "quota" to get shaped. Here's the shaping speed:
Evidently they've only bothered to throttle the download rate and haven't bothered to throttle the upload (the shaping speed is supposed to be 20/20 Mbps). It's the fastest shaping speed I've ever seen offered by any ISP in Australia on any product. For comparison this is the present shaping speeds iiNet offers:
iiNet Residential plans:
ADSL: 256/256kbps
ADSL (naked): 128/128kbps
NBN: 8/1Mbps
Cable: 1Mbps/1Mbps
VDSL2*: 10000/10000kbps
iiNet FttH: 256/256 kbps
iiNet Business plans:
ADSL: 128/128kbps
NBN: 8/1Mbps
Cable: 512/512kbps
VDSL2*: 20/20Mbps
*The VDSL2 network is the Transact network, not the NBN's FttN which is also VDSL2.
And some of the other major ISPs ...
TPG:
ADSL: 256K/256Kkbps - 1/1Mbps (depends on plan)
NBN: 128/128kbps
Telstra Residental:
ADSL: 256kbps
NBN: 256kbps
Cable: 256kbps
FttP: 256kbps
Satelite: 128kbps
Telstra Busisness:
ADSL: Is not shaped, extra data fees apply.
NBN: Is not shaped, extra data fees apply.
Optus:
ADSL: 256kbps
Cable: 256kbps
NBN: 256kbps
Internode (Residential):
ADSL: 256/256kbps
ADSL (naked): 128/128kbps
NBN: 256/256kbps
Internode (Busisness):
ADSL: 512/512 kbps
Okay, granted there are a few ISPs that offer so-called "unlimited" plans (although most say in the fine print that your line will be throttled without notice if you are a heavy user). So you can technically buy so-called unlimited unshaped speeds up to 200/200Mbit/s (from Spirit if you're lucky enough to live in area serviced by their fibre-to-the-apartment network) or 100/40Mbit on the NBN for $100/mo which is what I pay for my service, although do note I get a VOIP account with unlimited Australian calls including mobiles. But again, with so-called "unlimited" you're at their whim. At least with my service I know what I'm getting. I can theoretically use 5000GB* of data transfer and my speed won't drop below the shaped speed of 20/20 (and it took me 20 days of continually trying to download everything not nailed down on the internet just to get to 1,000GB!)
*Theoretically at 20Mbit/s I can download up to 200GB per day. Thus if I managed to use up 1000GB in the first 10 days, then over the next 20 days of the calendar month I could use a maximum of 4000GB just from download data (of course if I set up a web-server I could theoretically use 200GB a day in uploads also), but uploads aside (even though they are counted) I can only realistically expect to be able to use 5,000GB and that's if I really, really try.
But this gets me back to my point that shaping speeds are atrocious in this country. I'm lucky to be on the Transact network, which now offers NBN-like speeds, and a fucking terrific shaping speed that's much faster than most of Australia gets before being shaped (the average being 7.8Mbps as of Q3 2015, which appears to include both upload and download data making the true average something like 6.6/1.3Mbps). Out of the major ISPs, only iiNet offers competitive shaping speeds - and even then there's huge room for improvement. Cable internet delivers speeds of up to 100/20 (with some users reporting higher speeds), so it's faster than the Transact network which is advertised as delivering "up to" 80/20 speeds, yet the shaping speed is a merely 1/1Mbps. And also what's with their NBN shaping speed being a non-symmetrical 8/1Mbps? Why can't they offer 9.8/9.8Mbps like the Transact VDSL2?
It is, of course, all about Location Location. The SN I'm connected to, this one:
Is located 15 houses from me (I don't know where the node is, but I believe it's located on a pole in someone's back yard up to 8 houses away). Anyway, the point is the more congested the SN the worse your peak hour speeds (I never really notice a drop in speed, thus this box must have enough fibre running into it to cope with peak hour usage, others are not so lucky).
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
Posts: 4484
Threads: 185
Joined: October 12, 2012
Reputation:
44
RE: Internet speed, 2015
January 27, 2016 at 1:23 am
Okay, firstly here's the "professionally installed" phone/dsl port that Transact put in (I don't think it was ever rewired, I think it's about 14 years old):
It's the one connected to the grey wire. Here's my line info in the modem settings:
You might have noticed I popped out one of the other ports, it was connected to the Telstra wire, and I disconnected the No. 238 socket in the hallway and connected the cat5e socket to it thusly:
Above it you will notice the daisy-chained RJ11 I spoke of last post. This is the 1970's wiring that's 40 years old and this is the line stats I get when connected to it:
WTF?
It's just temporary of course, I will feed a new cable down the ceiling and wire it to the socket, but right now the 1970's wire gives me a better line rate than the 2000's wire!
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
|