Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 3:41 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
Definitely.
Reply
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
(February 16, 2016 at 11:03 pm)PaulMaul Wrote: Sye Ten and his "brain in a vat" nonsense.

I hear "brain in a vat" and it makes me think of Mars Attacks:





I joked with a friend of mine about how I spend too much time thinking and don't get out enough,
and how I'll eventually end up just a "brain in a vat"
and I'll end up only talking like the aliens in 'Mars Attacks':

"Ak! Ak! Ak! Ak! Ak! Ak!"

....and my friend started laughing a bit and said,

" MTL, honey...you kinda already do. "
Reply
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
Since we're summoning up Sye Ten, and I wish we hadn't, we have to have his irritating "everybody already knows 'God' exists" presup bollocks.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
(February 14, 2016 at 4:01 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: My personal favorite for amusement purposes is Wendy Wright screeching out to Dawkins "Were you THERE?!!" I don't think I've ever seen such a hysterically stupid person before, and I have met a lot of very stupid religious people!

Oh, and we also had a perfect troll who claimed to be a top biology student, while insisting that every life form shows "perfect design" - yeah, how could I not see how obvious that is?

It's not perfect (it literally couldn't be) but the design is pretty apparent when you look at how the cell works.
Reply
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
Another two I hate (in images)

[Image: 1351118073_9879_Fetus.jpg?itok=hwyUpuAX]

[Image: B_iX4bKXAAAx6xJ.jpg]
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Reply
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
(February 17, 2016 at 8:08 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Since we're summoning up Sye Ten, and I wish we hadn't, we have to have his irritating "everybody already knows 'God' exists" presup bollocks.

Precisely.

Deep in their hearts all humans know that the AllFather exists and his son, Thor, is his champion upon the Earth.

We even have two week days named after them.  The Abrahamic god, not so much.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
(February 17, 2016 at 9:22 pm)AAA Wrote:
(February 14, 2016 at 4:01 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: My personal favorite for amusement purposes is Wendy Wright screeching out to Dawkins "Were you THERE?!!" I don't think I've ever seen such a hysterically stupid person before, and I have met a lot of very stupid religious people!

Oh, and we also had a perfect troll who claimed to be a top biology student, while insisting that every life form shows "perfect design" - yeah, how could I not see how obvious that is?

It's not perfect (it literally couldn't be) but the design is pretty apparent when you look at how the cell works.


Only if you think argument from analogy and complexity are compelling.

Problem is, complexity is not a sign of design.

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Reply
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
(February 17, 2016 at 10:04 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:
(February 17, 2016 at 9:22 pm)AAA Wrote: It's not perfect (it literally couldn't be) but the design is pretty apparent when you look at how the cell works.


Only if you think argument from analogy and complexity are compelling.

Problem is, complexity is not a sign of design.
It's not just complex, though. There are so many purposeful interactions that need to take place in order for the cell to regulate itself. These interactions are dependent on intricate structures, which are dependent on sequence of characters in DNA. When you remove one enzyme, the whole system might no longer be able to function. So the problem is that in order for it to work well enough to evolve (reproduce), you need tens of thousands of nucleotides in a proper sequence. It couldn't get there gradually, at least not by mutation and natural selection.
Reply
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
(February 17, 2016 at 10:13 pm)AAA Wrote:
(February 17, 2016 at 10:04 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: Only if you think argument from analogy and complexity are compelling.

Problem is, complexity is not a sign of design.
It's not just complex, though. There are so many purposeful interactions that need to take place in order for the cell to regulate itself. These interactions are dependent on intricate structures, which are dependent on sequence of characters in DNA. When you remove one enzyme, the whole system might no longer be able to function. So the problem is that in order for it to work well enough to evolve (reproduce), you need tens of thousands of nucleotides in a proper sequence. It couldn't get there gradually, at least not by mutation and natural selection.

Look out, guys. Irreducible complexity bullshit coming up real soon.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: What's the lamest defence of Theism you've ever heard?
Worst argument I heard:

"If evolution is true then how come there aren't slug people that slugs have evolved from?"
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Science and Theism Doesn't Work out right? Hellomate1234 28 1377 November 7, 2024 at 8:12 am
Last Post: syntheticadrenaline
  Atheism, theism, agnosticism, gnosticism, ignosticism Simon Moon 25 3025 October 29, 2022 at 4:49 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Moral universalism and theism Interaktive 20 2521 May 6, 2022 at 7:23 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Comparing Theism with Flat-Earthism FlatAssembler 26 2915 December 21, 2020 at 3:10 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Protection Against the Wiles of Theism Rhondazvous 9 1842 April 7, 2019 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Have you Heathens heard the Good News? The Valkyrie 71 13732 January 26, 2018 at 9:52 pm
Last Post: rado84
  Anti-Theism Haipule 134 28557 December 20, 2017 at 1:39 pm
Last Post: Haipule
  Would you as an atheist EVER do this? Alexmahone 41 7493 December 6, 2017 at 10:47 pm
Last Post: Cecelia
  What date do you estimate atheism will overtake theism in the world population Coveny 49 14725 September 12, 2017 at 9:36 am
Last Post: mordant
  Do You Ever Miss God? Rhondazvous 75 23560 May 20, 2017 at 4:33 pm
Last Post: Silver



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)