Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
September 1, 2016 at 3:12 pm (This post was last modified: September 1, 2016 at 3:14 pm by drfuzzy.)
(August 29, 2016 at 11:10 am)Little Rik Wrote:
(August 29, 2016 at 1:07 am)ScienceAf Wrote:
Oh, boy, you are in a worse mental state than I thought.
Read your initial post.
It just contradict your idiotic excuse.
Gee, that would be a worry for me if you would strike.
I am all shaken.
If you want to be respected you got to deserve that respect.
So far you only talk crap after crap generalize all over the board.
Theists with the final S imply generalization and that is what you did write.
Now you are sinking in the sewer.
You already made up your mind that there aren't any.
Your...... good theists thread is a farce.
There are a myriad of mental conditions and everyone spring from different situations.
Yours spring up from making up your mind well before you have analyzed the full situation.
I do the effort of speaking and writing a language that is not my mother language.
You on the other hand are such a negative person that everything has got to rotate around your ego.
If you are such a sick boy at the age of 12 I just wonder what will be of you when you are older?
It is frighten just to think.
Any adult that would send this post to a 12-year-old is . . . many orders of magnitude more sick, twisted, and repulsive than the infantile insults contained within.
The 12-year-old is the adult here. There is a reason this asshole has earned the nicknames of "Sikky Rikky" and "Prikky" around here, Science. Don't feed the troll. He's here serving the purpose of the village crack-head idiot.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
(September 1, 2016 at 10:13 am)Little Rik Wrote: First of all YES. I don't care about wtf you believe it means...............
It is just funny boy.
With your judgement you just fall in the trap of dogma by believing that there is only one interpretation.
You are of the opinion that the correct meaning of dogma is the opinion probably written in an encycloped?ia but that opinion if taken as the ultimate truth it become a dogma itself.
Nothing in this limited universe stay the same even for a second.
What was the known truth in the past is discarded in the rubbish bin of history today and what is the golden truth today will be discarded in the rubbish bin tomorrow.
So no.
What make sense to someone may not make sense for others.
But let us see some official opinion about dogma.
In one opinion it goes.......a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true..........
This is clearly wrong because a dogma can be propound by anyone not just by an authority.
Let us see one more opinion.
It goes...........Dogma is a belief or set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted.........
Here we have one more defective interpretation.
Dogma is more than a belief.
It is rather a so called truth that according to the propounder-S should not be question by anyone not just by the members of a group.
One more interpretation...........that which one thinks is true......
Even this interpretation is not good enough because it miss the fact that the propounder of this opinion
does not require that other people should take his opinion as golden truth.
One last opinion.
.......a specific tenet or doctrine authoritatively laid down by a church.....
Even this opinion is defective because dogmas are not only religious but they can relate to anything
like politic, economy, morality and so on so as you can see there is not such a thing such as the only and correct interpretation around.
Only Sarkar opinion about the meaning of dogma make 100% sense.
All the rest miss something here and there.
Jesus fucking autocorrect christ.
Do you really think your words matter to me at this point.
Now please...
Back the fuck off.
You fail once again little brain.
First you introduce yourself with the pomposity of some smart and intelligent folk to everyone.
You write thread after thread in the hope that people take you seriously but what you write is all
garbage.
Then you ask me questions thinking that I will be unable to answer.
I did answer you in detail and that knock you down like when someone would burst a balloon of ego
with a simple needle.
As a response to your disaster failing you once again resort to swearing thinking that your mental
balance be restored.
I got bad news for you boy.
It want until you change your terrible attitude.
Have a good day anyway.
(September 1, 2016 at 3:12 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Any adult that would send this post to a 12-year-old is . . . many orders of magnitude more sick, twisted, and repulsive than the infantile insults contained within.
The 12-year-old is the adult here. There is a reason this asshole has earned the nicknames of "Sikky Rikky" and "Prikky" around here, Science. Don't feed the troll. He's here serving the purpose of the village crack-head idiot.
Oh, poor little boy.
Shell I cry?
What would you say if a 12 years old rape your 6 years old daughter?
Would he still be a little dear boy to you?
And by the way, what evidence have you that he is a 12 years old?
You believe little elf now?
Get real dreamer.
I was quite genuine and serious with my advice i.e all of us not responding to Rik, that's great advice. He is an idiot, just look at that 'poor' thing.
If I could, I would gladly nuke this horseshit from orbit.
(September 2, 2016 at 8:36 am)RozKek Wrote: I was quite genuine and serious with my advice i.e all of us not responding to Rik, that's great advice. He is an idiot, just look at that 'poor' thing.
If I could, I would gladly nuke this horseshit from orbit.
Please don't insult the intelligence of morons, idiots, and mental vegetables by saying Rik can be considered a candidate for one of those groups.
