Supernatural Evidence?

[chimp3]

Tequila good, rum evil.

Have you ever tasted 7 Year Old Gentlemans's Club from Havana? It may change your mind about rum. Like a nice cognac with a good hint of brown sugar. It may come on the U.S. market soon , I hope.

[Jehanne]

Yes, absolutely.  Let "god" heal a 1,000 adult amputees of his/her/its own choosing and I will renounce my atheism publicly, right on this board!

Remember this if there is evil in this world, then there must be something good, you can't have one without the other!!!!! Something good, was turned bad!!! Good has always come before anything was evil or bad! For example there are good spirits and there are evil spirits!!!!!!!!!! There are angels and there are demons!!!! There had to be a source that created the good and the bad!!

You're views are almost "heretical" and amount to religious dualism.  And, why all the "!!!s"?

[Astreja]

For example there are good spirits and there are evil spirits!!!!!!!!!! There are angels and there are demons!!!!

Got any evidence for the existence of spirits, TL2016?

I'd also like to point out that your exclamation point key seems to be stuck.  Try using a period instead.  Just one per sentence, please.

[chimp3]

Alright self-proclaimed athiests,

Better to be a "self-proclaimed" atheist than to be an accused atheist living in a theocracy.

Soldat du christ : Do you think Muhammed ascending to heaven on a winged horse is evidence for the supernatural?

How about Krishna appearing as an ideal lover to a hundred women at the same time?

[robvalue]

Alright self-proclaimed athiests, this is where your integrity is put into question. As some of you will so valiantly declair nuetrality, the default position being a lack of belief in god, rather than being closed off to the possibility.

Taking that stance will leave you inlcined to be open to the supernatural, as the very idea of God implies supernatural. This isn't a 'GOTCHA' question, i have a following proposition.

So, are you open to supernatural evidence?

I generally have no idea what "supernatural" even means, but sure. I'm generally only interested in evidence I can examine in some way, not stories people tell me. The problem tends to be that people define supernatural in such a way that it hides from our detection, and as such, there can't be any evidence of any use to us.

[downbeatplumb]

Alright self-proclaimed athiests, this is where your integrity is put into question. As some of you will so valiantly declair nuetrality, the default position being a lack of belief in god, rather than being closed off to the possibility.

Taking that stance will leave you inlcined to be open to the supernatural, as the very idea of God implies supernatural. This isn't a 'GOTCHA' question, i have a following proposition.

So, are you open to supernatural evidence?

I generally have no idea what "supernatural" even means, but sure. I'm generally only interested in evidence I can examine in some way, not stories people tell me. The problem tends to be that people define supernatural in such a way that it hides from our detection, and as such, there can't be any evidence of any use to us.

Supernatural seems to be an excuse for people to believe things without evidence, nothing more.
Ghosts are "supernatural" and people believe in them because of "feelings".

[robvalue]

Pretty much, yeah. Supernatural "evidence" is always either feelings, anecdotes or flawed logical arguments. In other words, it's not credible evidence of anything.

It is sad to me the lengths some adults will go to in order to pretend magic is real.

[rado84]

"Supernatural" is a sci-fi TV show that was good until season 8.
I hope that answers the question how open I am to the supernatural bullshit.

[Thumpalumpacus]

So, are you open to supernatural evidence?

How do you propose to bring what is outside of nature into nature?

[Whateverist]

I demand to see supernatural evidence for the existence of the natural world!