MODERATORS!!! Can you give myself and Drich …..

[Catholic_Lady]

Jesus Christ, a thread where you go back and forth with Drich is what my nightmares are made of.

That's like two blind people fighting over what color the sky is.

Faith No More,

Is there an absolute rule in this forum where you have to read it, or do you have the option of letting it pass?  Get it?



m

Such wise words spoken by my one and only true love.... 

[Crossless2.0]

Faith No More,

Is there an absolute rule in this forum where you have to read it, or do you have the option of letting it pass?  Get it?



m

Such wise words spoken by my one and only true love.... 

If you really loved him, you would teach him how to write 'irrelevant'.

Or have him committed. I'm good either way.

---

You'll be pleased to note that your moderator staff is even now researching the possibilities of weaponizing this and using it against the spammers and hackers plaguing this site.

Bah, the stupid Geneva convention probably forbids it.

Never mind weaponizing this thread.

I'm thinking enhanced interrogation:

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=ale...7d2e9070o1

[brewer]

m



Damn it!  I thought this forum had the option of doing this.    

No, its not about egos, like the "sideline nibblers" posting their irrelative tripe that has absolutely nothing to do
with the topic at hand, other than to make themselves fools as they childishly rant about the messenger instead of the message,
where the males of this group perceive that their male anatomy has grown, and for the females, their "breastesess" get bigger. 

Their needs to be an audience because it forces the debaters to be on their best game, and its also a learning process for others
to glean even the slightest of entities from a debate for future use when dealing with the inept pseudo-christians like Drich represents. 
As an example, I've learned from watching the great and late New Atheist Christopher Hitchens, where no Atheist will ever come close 
to emulating, where he treated the primitive faith of Christianity with ridicule, hatred and contempt, and where he fought against the wickedness 
and stupidity of this pagan faith at every turn (his exact words). 

Okay, now its time for the children to chime in as "sideline nibblers."  Who wants to be first?  How about "mh.brewer" who touts
that he doesn't need to see this crap, but still reads it nonetheless where he has the option of not reading it, and subsequently, childishly 
comments upon it anyway? LOL!  I know, FatAndFaithless is always good for an irrelative comment to the topic at hand, maybe
he can be first?  Wait, Catholic Lady is always good for a nondescript "runaway" comment to her embarrassing division of Christianity, maybe
this biblically second class women will be first?!

Kids, ya gotta love em!



m

21's bold's removed, my bold's added (how ya like me now?)

Nice try. It's all about your ego, the attention you will get, self fulfilling actions of grandeur. You get to "teach" us, oh goody! And we know it hurts your wittle feelers when we don't jump on your wagon touting that you're absolutely right, original and the best. And when you don't get the accolades you think you deserve from us you'll just rationalize it away with something like "I not surprised they can't see how great I am as they are just children compared to me". 

And I get to poke (nibble) at bullshit when I see it. Your limited patterns of argument, thinking and ego are the most glaring. It's the same old shit over and over and over. Don't like the poke, change, shut up or get the fuck out. What a whiny bitch. 

How do you like my irrelative tripe?

[Crossless2.0]

How do you like my irrelative tripe?

Now I crave menudo. 

[Thumpalumpacus]

"Irrelative".

[21stCenturyIconoclast]

m



Damn it!  I thought this forum had the option of doing this.    

No, its not about egos, like the "sideline nibblers" posting their irrelative tripe that has absolutely nothing to do
with the topic at hand, other than to make themselves fools as they childishly rant about the messenger instead of the message,
where the males of this group perceive that their male anatomy has grown, and for the females, their "breastesess" get bigger. 

Their needs to be an audience because it forces the debaters to be on their best game, and its also a learning process for others
to glean even the slightest of entities from a debate for future use when dealing with the inept pseudo-christians like Drich represents. 
As an example, I've learned from watching the great and late New Atheist Christopher Hitchens, where no Atheist will ever come close 
to emulating, where he treated the primitive faith of Christianity with ridicule, hatred and contempt, and where he fought against the wickedness 
and stupidity of this pagan faith at every turn (his exact words). 

Okay, now its time for the children to chime in as "sideline nibblers."  Who wants to be first?  How about "mh.brewer" who touts
that he doesn't need to see this crap, but still reads it nonetheless where he has the option of not reading it, and subsequently, childishly 
comments upon it anyway? LOL!  I know, FatAndFaithless is always good for an irrelative comment to the topic at hand, maybe
he can be first?  Wait, Catholic Lady is always good for a nondescript "runaway" comment to her embarrassing division of Christianity, maybe
this biblically second class women will be first?!

Kids, ya gotta love em!



m

21's bold's removed, my bold's added (how ya like me now?)

Nice try. It's all about your ego, the attention you will get, self fulfilling actions of grandeur. You get to "teach" us, oh goody! And we know it hurts your wittle feelers when we don't jump on your wagon touting that you're absolutely right, original and the best. And when you don't get the accolades you think you deserve from us you'll just rationalize it away with something like "I not surprised they can't see how great I am as they are just children compared to me". 

And I get to poke (nibble) at bullshit when I see it. Your limited patterns of argument, thinking and ego are the most glaring. It's the same old shit over and over and over. Don't like the poke, change, shut up or get the fuck out. What a whiny bitch. 

How do you like my irrelative tripe?

mh.brewer,

Damn it, albeit that you were upset by not being the first "sideline nibbler" to respond with IRRELATIVE tripe, huh?
If you're going to be the forums Grammar Nazi, by all means, correct Drich's terrible misspellings!  LOL 

Do the simple math, if you can, that one can glean from the slightest amounts of any debate, even Drich's statements as well.
I can see that you're upset with the fact that you could no more debate a pseudo-christian than a flattened crow on a Texas backroad could!  
Its quite obvious, therefore, accept your limitations, and move on.

Yeah, I am responsible for the alleged same old shit when it comes to discussing pseudo-christianity, in the same vein, as a
neurologist discussing different concepts of brain surgery.  Sorry, it comes with the territory.

Tell me, is this all you can do in this forum, is to chastise another in a circular reasoning way?  

DO YOU EVER ENTER A DISCUSSION ADDRESSING THE TOPIC AT HAND, DO YOU?  IF SO, GIVE ME AT LEAST 5 
THREADS OF YOU ALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN THIS MANNER, IF YOU CAN'T, THEN TO SAVE FURTHER
EMBARRASSMENT IN YOUR BEHALF, SHHHHHHHHHHHH.






B

[brewer]

21's bold's removed, my bold's added (how ya like me now?)

Nice try. It's all about your ego, the attention you will get, self fulfilling actions of grandeur. You get to "teach" us, oh goody! And we know it hurts your wittle feelers when we don't jump on your wagon touting that you're absolutely right, original and the best. And when you don't get the accolades you think you deserve from us you'll just rationalize it away with something like "I not surprised they can't see how great I am as they are just children compared to me". 

And I get to poke (nibble) at bullshit when I see it. Your limited patterns of argument, thinking and ego are the most glaring. It's the same old shit over and over and over. Don't like the poke, change, shut up or get the fuck out. What a whiny bitch. 

How do you like my irrelative tripe?

mh.brewer,

Damn it, albeit that you were upset by not being the first "sideline nibbler" to respond with IRRELATIVE tripe, huh?
If you're going to be the forums Grammar Nazi, by all means, correct Drich's terrible misspellings!  LOL 

Do the simple math, if you can, that one can glean from the slightest amounts of any debate, even Drich's statements as well.
I can see that you're upset with the fact that you could no more debate a pseudo-christian than a flattened crow on a Texas backroad could!  
Its quite obvious, therefore, accept your limitations, and move on.

Yeah, I am responsible for the alleged same old shit when it comes to discussing pseudo-christianity, in the same vein, as a
neurologist discussing different concepts of brain surgery.  Sorry, it comes with the territory.

Tell me, is this all you can do in this forum, is to chastise another in a circular reasoning way?  

DO YOU EVER ENTER A DISCUSSION ADDRESSING THE TOPIC AT HAND, DO YOU?  IF SO, GIVE ME AT LEAST 5 
THREADS OF YOU ALLEGEDLY ENGAGING IN THIS MANNER, IF YOU CAN'T, THEN TO SAVE FURTHER
EMBARRASSMENT IN YOUR BEHALF, SHHHHHHHHHHHH.






B

Do your own work, the threads are easy enough to find. But wait, they won't be yours so they will detract from your magnificentness. I'm quite sure that you won't.

I don't discuss your topics because they are pompous and quite boring. We've seen this before. You are not original. 

FYI: you forgot to use iron and bronze age. You slippin?

[21stCenturyIconoclast]

Their needs to be an audience because it forces the debaters to be on their best game, and its also a learning process for others
to glean even the slightest of entities from a debate for future use when dealing with the inept pseudo-christians like Drich represents. 
As an example, I've learned from watching the great and late New Atheist Christopher Hitchens, where no Atheist will ever come close 
to emulating, where he treated the primitive faith of Christianity with ridicule, hatred and contempt, and where he fought against the wickedness 
and stupidity of this pagan faith at every turn (his exact words). 
Kids, ya gotta love em!

Yeah, but Hitchens was actually intelligent, not a whiny, petulant moron that thinks being a cunt online makes him edgy.

(Jesus, dude, what is it with your posts being riddled with color and font tags?  There's one for each fucking sentence.  You can't even post right on a forum, and you think you can bring down Christianity?)

Faith No More,


Ahhh, the late great Christopher Hitchens, actually being a "cunt" in the same vein as you so describe, in the following link:

https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=A86.J71URXVY1lsAt5onnIlQ?p=christ+hitchens+really+coming+down+on+a+christian&fr=yhs-mozilla-002&fr2=piv-web&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002#id=7&vid=96f4d0fecaad5221c3322bb062717444&action=view

Oh my Yahweh, imagine an Atheist that does not meet your approval in how they are to conduct themselves!  What are you to do?! 
Your anxiety and displeasure that others are not following your rule must be off the charts! How can you even be on this forum at this time? 
Do you need to take a needed break in your holier than thou modus operandi?

Tell me if you've heard this one before? Do you really think that I give a shit in what your wussy Atheist approach thinks when I confront 
the inept pseudo-christian? In simpler terms for you to understand, take your "opinion" and %$#)(*&^@ it, okay? Thanks.





b

[Alex K]

Jebus, give it a rest.

[Faith No More]

Code:

[b][color=#ff3333]Faith No More,[/color][/b]


Ahhh, the late great Christopher Hitchens, actually being a "cunt" in the same vein as you so describe, in the following link:

[color=#323333][font=Tahoma]https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=A86.J71URXVY1lsAt5onnIlQ?p=christ+hitchens+really+coming+down+on+a+christian&fr=yhs-mozilla-002&fr2=piv-web&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002#id=7&vid=96f4d0fecaad5221c3322bb062717444&action=view[/font][/color]

[color=#323333][font=Tahoma]Oh my Yahweh, imagine an Atheist that does not meet your approval in how they are to conduct themselves!  What are you to do?! [/font][/color]
[color=#323333][font=Tahoma]Your anxiety and displeasure that others are not following your rule must be off the charts! How can you even be on this forum at this time? [/font][/color]
[color=#323333][font=Tahoma]Do you need [/font][/color][color=#323333][font=Tahoma]to take a needed break in your holier than thou modus operandi?[/font][/color]

[color=#323333][font=Tahoma]Tell me if you've heard this one before? [/font][/color][color=#323333][font=Tahoma]Do you really think that I give a shit in what your wussy Atheist approach thinks when I confront [/font][/color]
[color=#323333][font=Tahoma]the inept pseudo-christian? In simpler terms for you [/font][/color][color=#323333][font=Tahoma]to understand, take [/font][/color][color=#323333][font=Tahoma]your "opinion" and %$#)(*&^@ it, okay? Thanks.[/font][/color]


[color=#323333][font=Tahoma]:roflol: [/font][/color]


[font=Tahoma][color=#ffffff]b[/color][/font]

I put this in code tags, so everyone can see what a clusterfuck your posts are. You're so inept that even your smileys are surrounded by color and font tags.

Hitchens may have been a cunt sometimes, but at least he was a wordsmith that could intelligently lay out his objections and could intellectually debate in a manner that even some Christians came to respect him. You're just a cunt.

Worse yet, you're so dumb that you think just being a raging asshole is enough to follow in his footsteps.

(Boy, you gotta love AF, right? In one thread I'm being accused of having a "wussy atheists approach" while I'm simultaneously being told in another thread that I'm a douchebag for comparing god to the tooth fairy.)