The Irish just went full retard - Legalizing gender discrimination

[Thumpalumpacus]

You can't be that obtuse.

Boru

Oh yes, yes he can.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Was there a point to that post?

but you're fighting a fight men won at the dawn of fucking time.

What the fuck? What fight? What are you even talking about? Do you honestly see normal men going to their boring as shit work for making an honest living as doing some sort of "fight" to keep the number of men in that field high? HAHA! You're fucking nuts!

It really seems like you just don't like women much.

Ah yes. The old Bla Bla you hate women because you don't accept discrimination against you Bla Bla Bla. More Bla Bla Bla. This stopped being smart after the first 100 times you tried it.

Did you even read my post? I was saying how unfair it is to discriminate against men because they were born with a penis. I don't want to go to an interview and be denied an opportunity working there because I was born with a penis, something which I had no control over. That's blatant discrimination. Can we atleast agree on that?

[Shell B]

What the fuck? What fight? What are you even talking about?

Holy fucking knee-jerk, Batman. Calm your tits.

Do you honestly see normal men going to their boring as shit work for making an honest living as doing some sort of "fight" to keep the number of men in that field high? HAHA! You're fucking nuts!

Firstly, no. Every one, not just "normal men" has to go to a boring as shit or awesome or dangerous or whatever job to make a living. It's something everyone has to do, even women, you shit heel. And, no, most men just go to work to make money. When I say "fight," I'm talking about your inane, sexist, misinformed, half-literate freakouts about discrimination that I guaran-fucking-tee you have never faced. You think you're some revolutionary for the "have a penis" club. Guess what, ma'am? You're just reading the wrong subreddits. I actually agree with you that there needs to be some accountability for men's rights. I just think you're too fucking stupid to see where you actually need help.

Ah yes. The old Bla Bla you hate women because you don't accept discrimination against you Bla Bla Bla. More Bla Bla Bla. This stopped being smart after the first 100 times you did it.

I've spoken to you maybe three times in the entirety of your time here. Yes, I don't think you like women. You reek like those men who get mad when you won't sleep with them. The kind that say "don't you think it's too late to say no?" just because you didn't fight off a kiss. You sound like the red pill guys. You sound like the alt-right guys. You sound like an utter fucking lunatic.

Did you even read my post? I was saying how unfair it is to discriminate against men because they were born with a penis. I don't want to go to an interview and be denied an opportunity working there because I was born with a penis, something which I had no control over. That's blatant discrimination. Can we atleast agree on that?

Of course that's unfair. It's just not happening. Try it as a woman and see how that goes. Try going to a job where your boss thinks it's okay to talk down to you because you have a vagina, one where he makes so many fucked up jokes that you manage to get him fired for telling you he can make you cum with one finger. Try that, you fucking imbecile. No one's judged you for having a dick ever. They judge you because you're a piece of shit that's about as likeable as a dirty mop.

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Pahahah!

Edit:

Of course that's unfair. It's just not happening.

Did you even read the OP? Lol

As a sidenote, you're crazy. Scary crazy. Oh my.

[Jesster]

Yes, I got a good laugh out of her post too. It's so true I couldn't help myself!

[Shell B]

As a sidenote, you're crazy. Scary crazy. Oh my.

Yes, we already know you're scared of women.

[CanOfMountainDew]

"Firstly, sexism in government hiring is a given.  Find me a government structure anywhere in the world where males don't make up a whopping great majority of senior positions."

The second sentence - that is; your premise - does not necessitate the first - that is; your conclusion.

Linguistic flummery aside, can you give an explanation for the very nearly universal gender imbalance in government positions that is not rooted in sexism?

Boru

People make different choices. Dunno'. To just insert any explanation because nobody has a better one is a god of the gaps fallacy, though. You have to understand that that would be ironic for an atheist.

[Shell B]

People make different choices. Dunno'. To just insert any explanation because nobody has a better one is a god of the gaps fallacy, though. You have to understand that that would be ironic for an atheist.

Nobody has just filled in the blank on this one. Years, nay, centuries of observation have gone into this one. I hate to be "that guy," but white men are the least repressed people in the history of ever. Some of them seem flummoxed at the idea that anyone is being treated differently because they are always treated as if they have inherent merit, barring outright crackheads and morons.

[The Grand Nudger]

Don't get me wrong, I love working with women. Just the different energy you get from them are refreshing enough to make your work just a tiny bit less tedious. But c'mon, it's disheartening the see how obvious they are with their preference for female hires. It's common knowledge employees really really want to hire women (unless you've been living under a rock for the last 30 years) but it just feels so damn unfair to be denied an opportunity because of what gender I was born into, you know? How is this different from Hitler killing people because of something they were born into? This is sexism and I'm against it. Simple as that.

What opportunity have you ever been denied for having been born with a dick?  Maybe it's not your having a dick that's the problem, so much as being a dick?  

Food for thought. 0/10 on the godwin, btw, goddmanit you didn't even try.

@Dew
Those "different choices" people make are deeply rooted in gender roles. It's telling, for example, that women are/feel compelled to make a choice between career and children..whereas men....do not. We expect both, seamlessly. Amusingly enough, I went the stay at home daddy route fulltime a few years back, and I;m still at it off and on (I have family living with me to watch em now)...but it didn;t cause a blip in my employment. My wife took fmla for a few months and had to go back to work as a receptionist...quite a fall from division director. She;s spent the time since then working her way back up...and there's -always-...-always- the question of whether or not she intends to make it a career or go home to watch the kids someday, at every repeateted interview for every position that she's already held before. I wonder when they;re going to stop wondering about her...if they haven't stopped wondering by now. Nobody ever asks me that, though...lol. She gets the "theres a gap in your employment here, this is a concern" talk....I get the "that experience probably gave you useful skills" compliment. It's just expected of her, but it somehow speaks to my exceptional character.

[CanOfMountainDew]

People make different choices. Dunno'. To just insert any explanation because nobody has a better one is a god of the gaps fallacy, though. You have to understand that that would be ironic for an atheist.

Nobody has just filled in the blank on this one. Years, nay, centuries of observation have gone into this one. I hate to be "that guy," but white men are the least repressed people in the history of ever. Some of them seem flummoxed at the idea that anyone is being treated differently because they are always treated as if they have inherent merit, barring outright crackheads and morons.

If you want to have a debate about this I'll gladly accept. Certainly sexism has a historical significance; however it's a fallacy to say that x is true because x has historically been true.

As for white men being the least repressed people in the history of ever; that either belies an ignorance of history or an earnest commitment to narrative at the expense of accuracy.

For example right now, in 2017, It is an objective fact that in the US men have less legal rights than women. It is also an objective fact, right now, that in the US that there is legislated affirmative action for certain minorities, thereby giving minorities more legal rights than whites.