|
Ken Ham's Creation museum is FAILING!!!!!
|
 (August 25, 2017 at 7:10 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: See how much smarter you get when you read my postings ? I was reading Savages column in the local weekly when he held the Santorum naming contest. Very funny! Good advice column too!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
 (August 25, 2017 at 8:10 pm)Astonished Wrote: Here's how he'd try to weasel out of that; because of his claim that there's such a thing as historical science, which can't be relied on because 'were you there', he'll say that we can use observational science (the only kind there is) to determine that humans don't live long enough to have been there, or some such bullshit. But then of course he's got the cumbersome difficulty of explaining away mythical figures like Methuselah and Noah who lived to be over 500 each. Yes, but you see I was there. So he's either got to accept my testimony, ask for evidence (which demonstrates an understanding of the burden of proof - a sword which cuts him too), or dismiss me as a crank (which again cuts him just as much). No matter what objection he raises, there's always a rationalisation out of his own playbook to counter it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
"Well, if it's not in the bible, then it didn't happen." Or, "Well, if the bible says it happened differently, then it's the bible that's right, and science is wrong."
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
--- There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
That's more like it.
"God said it - I believe it - that settles it".
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Then again, this is the same Ken Ham who said that the bible doesn't say that Noah and co didn't use modern technology, so they might have done, therefore they did.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
A recent Kentucky Supreme Court ruling will for Ken Ham to follow "Truth in Advertising" laws for that state. As a result Ham has announced he will comply and is renaming his museum "Answers in Ignorance."
/fakenews
This is why there need to be stricter fucking definitions on what constitutes evidence. Assholes like RoadRunner wanting testimony to be put on the highest tier are making it possible for bullshit like this to pass through when they ought to be aborted from the tiny minds of their creators via experimental surgery.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
--- There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views. RE: Ken Ham's Creation museum is FAILING!!!!!
August 27, 2017 at 12:02 pm
(This post was last modified: August 27, 2017 at 12:02 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(August 27, 2017 at 6:47 am)Cyberman Wrote: Then again, this is the same Ken Ham who said that the bible doesn't say that Noah and co didn't use modern technology, so they might have done, therefore they did. Magic book doesn't say it -wasn't- a multitier reinforced concrete mesh pylon supported structure with a wooden facade. You can't prove it wasn't, were you there? 
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Yes, I was.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
(August 27, 2017 at 12:02 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(August 27, 2017 at 6:47 am)Cyberman Wrote: Then again, this is the same Ken Ham who said that the bible doesn't say that Noah and co didn't use modern technology, so they might have done, therefore they did. Or with a workforce of thousands. Just curious, did they even bother building it out of the same kind of wood that would have been available that long ago in a place I don't really imagine there being a lot of trees?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
--- There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
