Posts: 46136
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 9:51 am
(This post was last modified: January 7, 2018 at 9:51 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(inspired by the disgusting religious words thread)
Are you able to appreciate religious art as art? In other words, can you separate the art from the artist?
Some of the most breathtakingly beautiful works of art ever produced by humans have been inspired by religion, and executed by deeply religious artists. A few examples include Michelangelo's Pieta, the stained glass at Chartres Cathedral, and Pacher's St. Wolfgang Altarpiece. These (and many more) have always impressed or moved me as much as purely secular art.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 67196
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 10:02 am
Absolutely, though christian fetishism is less appealing to me than other types. You can only look at a sanitized picture of a man with a halo so many times.
Needs moar ta-tas.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 10:33 am
Another portrayal of Mammon.
(Yeah, I lurv Mammon)
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 7318
Threads: 75
Joined: April 18, 2015
Reputation:
73
RE: Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 10:48 am
Classical music. Enough said.
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 10:53 am
(January 7, 2018 at 9:51 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (inspired by the disgusting religious words thread)
Are you able to appreciate religious art as art? In other words, can you separate the art from the artist?
Some of the most breathtakingly beautiful works of art ever produced by humans have been inspired by religion, and executed by deeply religious artists. A few examples include Michelangelo's Pieta, the stained glass at Chartres Cathedral, and Pacher's St. Wolfgang Altarpiece. These (and many more) have always impressed or moved me as much as purely secular art.
Boru
"Religious" is a loaded word. Buddhism is a religion, so is Hinduism, so is any polytheism, such as the ancient Greeks and Romans and ancient Egyptians.
The only difference between mythology and religion is that mythology is religion that is dead, and religion is a word used for things still believed.
Having said that, I certainly have seen religious art that is beautiful. The religious art of the polytheistic Egyptians with it's bright colors I love. I am not fond of the middle age drab art of Gothic Europe or the bland church art of the Americas. I have seen very beautiful Buddhist temples in Japan. But lets be clear, finding any religious art beautiful does not make any religion the one true religion.
The sandstone sculptures of the Ankor Watt dynasty, depicting BOTH Buddhist and Hindu features that I saw at the Smithsonian decades ago, was very beautiful.
I am not for destroying mythological religious art regardless of finding all religions superfluous. Not saying you are implying that, but no, I would not destroy a Jesus painting or blow up a Buddhist statue. It is still part of our species history.
Posts: 1176
Threads: 30
Joined: May 22, 2017
Reputation:
21
RE: Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 10:55 am
I can like religious art. Some of my favorite songs are religious. (See: o' brother where art thou)
Though i think it a false assumption to think Michelangelo or Leonardo da vinci or The likes were religious. They might have been. But they lived in a time in which most of their work was contracted by The church. If there had been other less religious organizations employing them, perhaps The art they made would have been less religious.
"If we go down, we go down together!"
- Your mum, last night, suggesting 69.
-
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 11:00 am
(January 7, 2018 at 10:55 am)Mr.Obvious Wrote: I can like religious art. Some of my favorite songs are religious. (See: o' brother where art thou)
Though i think it a false assumption to think Michelangelo or Leonardo da vinci or The likes were religious. They might have been. But they lived in a time in which most of their work was contracted by The church. If there had been other less religious organizations employing them, perhaps The art they made would have been less religious.
Ugggggg, music is different to me. I cannot get into religious music no matter how well the instruments are played. If you are singing a song about humans with super powers or sky heros I cant get into it.
Posts: 1176
Threads: 30
Joined: May 22, 2017
Reputation:
21
RE: Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 11:04 am
(January 7, 2018 at 11:00 am)Brian37 Wrote: (January 7, 2018 at 10:55 am)Mr.Obvious Wrote: I can like religious art. Some of my favorite songs are religious. (See: o' brother where art thou)
Though i think it a false assumption to think Michelangelo or Leonardo da vinci or The likes were religious. They might have been. But they lived in a time in which most of their work was contracted by The church. If there had been other less religious organizations employing them, perhaps The art they made would have been less religious.
Ugggggg, music is different to me. I cannot get into religious music no matter how well the instruments are played. If you are singing a song about humans with super powers or sky heros I cant get into it.
This is The ultimate showdown of ultimate history...
"If we go down, we go down together!"
- Your mum, last night, suggesting 69.
-
Posts: 46136
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 11:06 am
Quote:"Religious" is a loaded word.
How so?
Quote:Buddhism is a religion, so is Hinduism, so is any polytheism, such as the ancient Greeks and Romans and ancient Egyptians.
I take it that this means I should have included examples of non-Christian art. Fair enough. The Taj Mahal, the bead work of Native Americans, pre-Christian Celtic knotwork (both inscribe and cast), and many more.
Quote:The only difference between mythology and religion is that mythology is religion that is dead, and religion is a word used for thing
s still believed.
True, but hardly germane to the topic.
Quote:Having said that, I certainly have seen religious art that is beautiful.
So, your answer to my question is 'yes'. Thank you.
Quote:The religious art of the polytheistic Egyptians with it's bright colors I love. I am not fond of the middle age drab art of Gothic Europe or the bland church art of the Americas. I have seen very beautiful Buddhist temples in Japan.
You grasp that my question doesn't require anyone to enjoy religious art, I hope.
Quote:But lets be clear, finding any religious art beautiful does not make any religion the one true religion.
No one said it did. I asked if you can appreciate religious art as art.
Quote:The sandstone sculptures of the Ankor Watt dynasty, depicting BOTH Buddhist and Hindu features that I saw at the Smithsonian decades ago, was very beautiful.
Agreed, although you're one up on me, as I haven't seen these in person.
Quote:I am not for destroying mythological religious art regardless of finding all religions superfluous. Not saying you are implying that, but no, I would not destroy a Jesus painting or blow up a Buddhist statue. It is still part of our species history.
Again, you address a point that no one raised.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 30726
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Religious Art: Yea or Nay?
January 7, 2018 at 11:07 am
(January 7, 2018 at 11:04 am)Mr.Obvious Wrote: (January 7, 2018 at 11:00 am)Brian37 Wrote: Ugggggg, music is different to me. I cannot get into religious music no matter how well the instruments are played. If you are singing a song about humans with super powers or sky heros I cant get into it.
This is The ultimate showdown of ultimate history...
No, a meteor killing our species, and the sun eventually killing our entire solar system is our "ultimate" history. Claims of Gods are on par with Marvel or D.C. comics, but not much more than that.
|