Admitting You're a Sinner

[Cyberman]

Then you had better get right with your pet god and obey its rules, if you are choosing to stand by the words you quote.


I don't give a fuck for contradictions in shitty mythology. Only doublethink in its mouthpieces.

"The fool says in his heart there is no God."

The statement in the Bible doesn't call for a trumpeter, but it certainly allows some pretty clear and simple deductions.

Then what do you deduce from the full psalm?

"For the director of music. Of David. The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good."

Do you still stand behind the accusation?

To reiterate, atheism at it's most basic is the position of not being convinced that gods do exist - not "there is no god". Some, perhaps many, atheists might think that, but that's a bolt-on to the standard atheist position, ie the single common denominator.

Would you like me to show some hypocrisy? or would I be in no "danger of hell fire" because hell won't ever exist?

Hey, it's your fantasy; you can do whatever you want with it. Just as long as you make it clear early on what you mean by these terms and not switch gears Dolhpinetically to suit yourself.

[Succubus]

"The fool says in his heart, there is no God"

Didn't you get a bit of a kicking just last week for this shit, in this same thread.

[Banned]

Then what do you deduce from the full psalm?

"For the director of music. Of David. The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good."

Do you still stand behind the accusation?

To reiterate, atheism at it's most basic is the position of not being convinced that gods do exist - not "there is no god". Some, perhaps many, atheists might think that, but that's a bolt-on to the standard atheist position, ie the single common denominator.

Would you like me to show some hypocrisy? or would I be in no "danger of hell fire" because hell won't ever exist?

Hey, it's your fantasy; you can do whatever you want with it. Just as long as you make it clear early on what you mean by these terms and not switch gears Dolhpinetically to suit yourself.

I did not call anyone a fool, I just quoted the scripture which says that someone who denies God is a fool, and then I was told that other scripture condemns calling someone a fool, which is not what I did.

[LadyForCamus]

Then what do you deduce from the full psalm?

"For the director of music. Of David. The fool says in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good."

Do you still stand behind the accusation?

To reiterate, atheism at it's most basic is the position of not being convinced that gods do exist - not "there is no god". Some, perhaps many, atheists might think that, but that's a bolt-on to the standard atheist position, ie the single common denominator.


Hey, it's your fantasy; you can do whatever you want with it. Just as long as you make it clear early on what you mean by these terms and not switch gears Dolhpinetically to suit yourself.

I did not call anyone a fool, I just quoted the scripture which says that someone who denies God is a fool, and then I was told that other scripture condemns calling someone a fool, which is not what I did.

Why should I care what your book says?

I’m still waiting for someone to answer this question...

[Whateverist]

I did not call anyone a fool, I just quoted the scripture which says that someone who denies God is a fool, and then I was told that other scripture condemns calling someone a fool, which is not what I did.

Why should I care what your book says?

I’m still waiting for someone to answer this question...

Get comfortable.  I am sure he has no answer to that question nor will he admit it has any relevance.  He'll just go on strutting and crowing, knocking pieces over and regularly declaring victory.

[LadyForCamus]

Why should I care what your book says?

I’m still waiting for someone to answer this question...

Get comfortable.  I am sure he has no answer to that question nor will he admit it has any relevance.  He'll just go on strutting and crowing, knocking pieces over and regularly declaring victory.

You forgot shitting.  😁

[Whateverist]

Get comfortable.  I am sure he has no answer to that question nor will he admit it has any relevance.  He'll just go on strutting and crowing, knocking pieces over and regularly declaring victory.

You forgot shitting.  😁

Oh he is full of that and these forums bear the stain.

[Banned]

Why should I care what your book says?

I’m still waiting for someone to answer this question...

Why should you care? That depends on whether it is the truth or not.

It has been preserved for millennia and stands as the oldest and most proliferated text in the world.
It claims to enable the human race to be informed and prepared to live in harmony with God.

[LadyForCamus]

Why should I care what your book says?

I’m still waiting for someone to answer this question...

Why should you care? That depends on whether it is the truth or not.

It has been preserved for millennia and stands as the oldest and most proliferated text in the world.
It claims to enable the human race to be informed and prepared to live in harmony with God.

So essentially your answer is, because it’s really old and it makes claims about a god. You honestly think these are good reasons to take it seriously?

[Whateverist]

Why should I care what your book says?

I’m still waiting for someone to answer this question...

Why should you care? That depends on whether it is the truth or not.

It has been preserved for millennia and stands as the oldest and most proliferated text in the world.
It claims to enable the human race to be informed and prepared to live in harmony with God.

Doesn't matter to me.  It is just a book and as such will ever only have meanings which will elude you so long as you take all that crap literally.