Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 5:46 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
#31
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 8:54 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: "Scientists have recently estimated that there are approximately 8.7 million species on Earth. They believe that 1-2 million of those species are animals."

That was one hellishly cramped ark if kind is equal to species.  That's equal to 3 animals per cubic foot, at minimum.
I take it you don't believe in evolution? Animal life didn't start out with 2 million species...
Reply
#32
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
Quote:I take it you don't believe in evolution? Animal life didn't start out with 2 million species...
Even if you compressed it down as far as possible it still is not possible . We don't need 2 million . And bashing evolution does not help your case .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
#33
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 9:02 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:
Quote:Are all mammals identical?
They don't need to be to refute your nonsense . They have a sweep of overarching characteristics. Which is why they are classified as mammals .

Then you agree with me muppet...

If all mammals are not identical then they are DISTINCT.

Your boi chimp basically stated there is NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN ALL MAMMALS, meaning they are all identical.
Reply
#34
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 9:14 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 9:02 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: They don't need to be to refute your nonsense . They have a sweep of overarching characteristics. Which is why they are classified as mammals .

Then you agree with me muppet...

If all mammals are not identical then they are DISTINCT.

Your boi chimp basically stated there is NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN ALL MAMMALS, meaning they are all identical.

Your boi chimp says that all mammals have enough similarities to be called mammals. You have nipples, don't you mate!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
#35
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
Quote:Then you agree with me muppet...
Nope 


Quote:If all mammals are not identical then they are DISTINCT
But their similar enough to render your definition useless 


Quote:Your boi chimp basically stated there is NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN ALL MAMMALS, meaning they are all identical.
No he didn't he said they have a sweep of overarching similarities which is why they classified as mammals . He never said that all mammals are exactly the same in every way . Nor does it matter to render your definition of kind useless ans arbitrary .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.

Inuit Proverb

Reply
#36
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 9:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 8:54 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: "Scientists have recently estimated that there are approximately 8.7 million species on Earth. They believe that 1-2 million of those species are animals."

That was one hellishly cramped ark if kind is equal to species.  That's equal to 3 animals per cubic foot, at minimum.
I take it you don't believe in evolution? Animal life didn't start out with 2 million species...
I take it you believe a 600 year old man built a wooden boat that held every “kind” that existed during his time? What, 6000 years ago? How many species do you think existed during that time?
I believe in life before death.
Reply
#37
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 9:18 pm)Antares Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 9:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I take it you don't believe in evolution? Animal life didn't start out with 2 million species...
I take it you believe a 600 year old man built a wooden boat that held every “kind” that existed during his time? What, 6000 years ago? How many species do you think existed during that time?

I don't know where you got that the Ark housed "every “kind” that existed" from, I've already explained my position on that in other threads.

(October 19, 2017 at 12:41 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It is known that all species of cats (for example) that exist today, have a common ancestor.



[Image: Cat+Kind+DNA+Chain.jpg]

This shows that all that was required on the ark was two cats, not EVERY species of cat that existed, so that reduces the number of animals required significantly.
Reply
#38
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 9:43 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 9:18 pm)Antares Wrote: I take it you believe a 600 year old man built a wooden boat that held every “kind” that existed during his time? What, 6000 years ago? How many species do you think existed during that time?

I don't know where you got that the Ark housed "every “kind” that existed" from, I've already explained my position on that in other threads.

(October 19, 2017 at 12:41 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It is known that all species of cats (for example) that exist today, have a common ancestor.



[Image: Cat+Kind+DNA+Chain.jpg]

This shows that all that was required on the ark was two cats, not EVERY species of cat that existed, so that reduces the number of animals required significantly.
How fucking convenient, lol.  Rolleyes And, flawed. You’re saying that every cat branched out from its “common ancestor” right after your magic boat came to rest on a mountain only 6000 years ago?
I believe in life before death.
Reply
#39
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 9:57 pm)Antares Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 9:43 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I don't know where you got that the Ark housed "every “kind” that existed" from, I've already explained my position on that in other threads.
How fucking convenient, lol.  Rolleyes And, flawed. You’re saying that every cat branched out from its “common ancestor” right after your magic boat came to rest on a mountain only 6000 years ago?

It's worse than that since the flood allegedly happened around 4000 years ago. But, that's his claim alright. And he'll ignore shit like the fact that cat domestication began in Egypt well before his flood, and that they never had a world wide flood in Egypt.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#40
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
(March 17, 2018 at 10:03 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:
(March 17, 2018 at 9:57 pm)Antares Wrote: How fucking convenient, lol.  Rolleyes And, flawed. You’re saying that every cat branched out from its “common ancestor” right after your magic boat came to rest on a mountain only 6000 years ago?

It's worse than that since the flood allegedly happened around 4000 years ago. But, that's his claim alright. And he'll ignore shit like the fact that cat domestication began in Egypt well before his flood, and that they never had a world wide flood in Egypt.

Not only did that geriatric Boatwright build his first ship, he must have built the first boat. Ever?
I believe in life before death.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  This is Kind of Sad Minimalist 0 450 August 19, 2017 at 9:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Different kind of Traffic Stop Minimalist 3 1330 May 13, 2015 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
Tongue Stuff Creationist Say Cholley71 0 779 April 21, 2013 at 1:47 am
Last Post: Cholley71
  Every Debate With A Creationist.... Minimalist 4 2821 September 13, 2011 at 7:43 am
Last Post: searchingforanswers
  Funny pics of all kind Ace Otana 74 54861 September 16, 2010 at 11:59 am
Last Post: Eilonnwy
  Top 10 creationist arguments Dotard 4 1403 February 10, 2010 at 8:22 am
Last Post: Pippy



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)