Posts: 66304
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
160
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 2:14 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 2:15 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Will it? So? I want to see if it's true in action or simply true as a convention of how people use it. Take a stab man, respond to the kinds survey. Show us that kind is synonymous with species by your answers.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 5:17 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 5:18 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 17, 2018 at 2:14 pm)Khemikal Wrote: Will it? So? I want to see if it's true in action or simply true as a convention of how people use it. Take a stab man, respond to the kinds survey. Show us that kind is synonymous with species by your answers. You act as if I defined the word, if you want to argue with the dictionary be my guest...
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/species
Quote:species
1. a class of individuals having some common characteristics or qualities; distinct sort or kind.
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 7:39 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 5:17 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Quote:species
1. a class of individuals having some common characteristics or qualities; distinct sort or kind.
So, chimps, humans, raccoons, horses, pigs, and rabbits have fur, live birth, feed their young with milk. Does this make them a "kind"?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 7958
Threads: 38
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 7:47 pm
Meh. Huggies has already been proven wrong on his kind unto kind bullshit. Making him embarrass himself further seems kinda pointless.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:02 pm
Quote:species
1. a class of individuals having some common characteristics or qualities; distinct sort or kind.
So fish, bird, reptiles , mammals, are all a kind because they all have a spines and were also related to insects,crustaceans, by the fact we all have eukaryotic cells. You see why biologists don't use your classification system.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:16 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 8:22 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 17, 2018 at 7:39 pm)chimp3 Wrote: So, chimps, humans, raccoons, horses, pigs, and rabbits have fur, live birth, feed their young with milk. Does this make them a "kind"?
No dummy, the definition clearly stated a class of INDIVIDUALS having some common characteristics or qualities; DISTINCT sort or kind.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/distinct
Quote:distinct
1. distinguished as not being the same; not identical; separate
The creatures you mentioned are clearly distinct from one another.
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:21 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 8:22 pm by chimp3.)
Yes they all have mammary glands, fur, and give live birth to their young!
Identical? Are you identical to your dad, mom, sister?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:28 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 8:29 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 17, 2018 at 8:21 pm)chimp3 Wrote: Yes they all have mammary glands, fur, and give live birth to their young!
Identical? Are you identical to your dad, mom, sister? Let me word it differently since you clearly didn't understand.
Are you saying chimps, humans, raccoons, horses, pigs, and rabbits aren't distinct from one another?
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:31 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 8:28 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 8:21 pm)chimp3 Wrote: Yes they all have mammary glands, fur, and give live birth to their young!
Identical? Are you identical to your dad, mom, sister?
Are you saying chimps, humans, raccoons, horses, pigs, and rabbits aren't distinct from one another? They are all cousins. Closely related. All mammals sharing some very primary characteristics. If, in the 21st century you do not know this, you are an ignorant fool!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 8:33 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 8:31 pm)chimp3 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 8:28 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Are you saying chimps, humans, raccoons, horses, pigs, and rabbits aren't distinct from one another? They are all cousins. Closely related. All mammals sharing some very primary characteristics. If, in the 21st century you do not know this, you are an ignorant fool!
It's a simple yes or no question... are they distinct from one another or aren't they?
|
