Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 10:09 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 10:12 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 17, 2018 at 9:57 pm)Antares Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 9:43 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I don't know where you got that the Ark housed "every “kind” that existed" from, I've already explained my position on that in other threads. How fucking convenient, lol.  And, flawed. You’re saying that every cat branched out from its “common ancestor” right after your magic boat came to rest on a mountain only 6000 years ago?
How long are you saying it should take for a cat to produce a different breed?
Posts: 529
Threads: 10
Joined: December 20, 2017
Reputation:
21
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 10:13 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 10:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 9:57 pm)Antares Wrote: How fucking convenient, lol. And, flawed. You’re saying that every cat branched out from its “common ancestor” right after your magic boat came to rest on a mountain only 6000 years ago?
How long are you saying it should take for a new breed of cat to appear?
The question at hand is not how long it takes for a new breed to appear but how long it took for all cats to evolve from this recent ark ancestor you’ve proposed.
I believe in life before death.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 10:16 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 10:18 pm by Amarok.)
![[Image: ?url=2.bp.blogspot.com%2F--cfCP63LoqU%2F...BChain.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=2.bp.blogspot.com%2F--cfCP63LoqU%2FUjEwvDtLCJI%2FAAAAAAAAAXY%2F9liq2XpraYI%2Fs1600%2FCat%2BKind%2BDNA%2BChain.jpg)
That is the dumbest thing i have ever seen
![[Image: tmp11434_thumb1_thumb1.jpg?imgmax=800]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=lh3.ggpht.com%2F_NNjxeW9ewEc%2FTJwugy8rr8I%2FAAAAAAAADwQ%2FYyHd9H1pMmk%2Ftmp11434_thumb1_thumb1.jpg%3Fimgmax%3D800)
Much better
![[Image: 1253px-An_evolutionary_tree_of_mammals.jpeg]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0e/An_evolutionary_tree_of_mammals.jpeg/1253px-An_evolutionary_tree_of_mammals.jpeg)
Better still
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 8239
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 10:18 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 10:20 pm by Ravenshire.)
(March 17, 2018 at 10:09 pm)Antares Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 10:03 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: It's worse than that since the flood allegedly happened around 4000 years ago. But, that's his claim alright. And he'll ignore shit like the fact that cat domestication began in Egypt well before his flood, and that they never had a world wide flood in Egypt.
Not only did that geriatric Boatwright build his first ship, he must have built the first boat. Ever?
Hey, it's Huggies we're talking about. He believes a biblical time line that means all of creation came into existence well after the Sumerians invented glue. 
(March 17, 2018 at 10:09 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 9:57 pm)Antares Wrote: How fucking convenient, lol. And, flawed. You’re saying that every cat branched out from its “common ancestor” right after your magic boat came to rest on a mountain only 6000 years ago?
How long are you saying it should take for a cat to produce a different breed?
Wow. Now breeds are equivalent to species?!? Huggies, you're a special kind of stupid.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 10:20 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 10:23 pm by Amarok.)
Quote:Wow. Now breeds are equivalent to species?!? Huggies, you're a special kind of stupid.
The words kinda jumble 
I suggest huggy use the words as biologists define them . Not common dictionary uses.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 10:39 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 10:18 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: Wow. Now breeds are equivalent to species?!? Huggies, you're a special kind of stupid. No dummy, breeds exist WITHIN a species.
If two animals can produce fertile ofsping then they belong to the same species, if these two animals are distinctly different then they are different breeds of the same species... got it?
Posts: 8239
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 10:48 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 10:39 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 10:18 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: Wow. Now breeds are equivalent to species?!? Huggies, you're a special kind of stupid. No dummy, breeds exist WITHIN a species.
If two animals can produce fertile ofsping then they belong to the same species, if these two animals are distinctly different then they are different breeds of the same species... got it?
Not what your post implied, but whatever, asshole. You're still the one who believes all speciation in the world occurred in just 4,000 years and that's still a special kind of stupid.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 10:50 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 10:50 pm by Amarok.)
No that's still you talking shit huggy then trying to bury your shit .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 10:55 pm
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2018 at 10:56 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(March 17, 2018 at 10:48 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 10:39 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: No dummy, breeds exist WITHIN a species.
If two animals can produce fertile ofsping then they belong to the same species, if these two animals are distinctly different then they are different breeds of the same species... got it?
Not what your post implied, but whatever, asshole. You're still the one who believes all speciation in the world occurred in just 4,000 years and that's still a special kind of stupid.
Wasn't the OP talking about how a type salamander could produce a new species every few months?
So answer question, how long does it take for an animal to produce a new breed?
Posts: 8239
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: Creationist "Kind" - A Classification with No Definition
March 17, 2018 at 11:08 pm
(March 17, 2018 at 10:55 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: (March 17, 2018 at 10:48 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: Not what your post implied, but whatever, asshole. You're still the one who believes all speciation in the world occurred in just 4,000 years and that's still a special kind of stupid.
Wasn't the OP talking about how a type salamander could produce a new species every few months?
So answer question, how long does it take for an animal to produce a new breed?
Deflection noted.
You really think there's a single answer to that for all animals?!? You've already been worked on speciation once. You really want to go there again?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
|
