Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 20, 2018 at 2:18 pm
Quote:I think you have a different definition of refute than I do. For me, to refute, one would have to give reason against it.
If you want to defend that position feel free.
Yes yours is pigheadedly refusing to admit you were beaten along with stevey . Mine is the standard definition that Polymath beat you . Position defended and their is what 2 threads as a permanent testament to the fact .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 3709
Threads: 18
Joined: September 29, 2015
Reputation:
10
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 20, 2018 at 2:20 pm
(April 20, 2018 at 2:18 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Quote:I think you have a different definition of refute than I do. For me, to refute, one would have to give reason against it.
If you want to defend that position feel free.
Yes yours is pigheadedly refusing to admit you were beaten along with stevey . Mine is the standard definition that Polymath beat you . Position defended and their is what 2 threads as a permanent testament to the fact .
I didn't think you would say anything falsifiable (even though you claim that poly already did the work) If you just want to name call and try to make others small, then back on ignore you go!
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 20, 2018 at 2:42 pm
Quote:I didn't think you would say anything falsifiable (even though you claim that poly already did the work) If you just want to name call and try to make others small, then back on ignore you go!
That just it poly already did so. So why must i ? And pointing out he beat you is not name calling or belittling it simply stating a fact . But by all means ignore me that won't change the fact Poly proved this very statement wrong and it written for all to see .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 3709
Threads: 18
Joined: September 29, 2015
Reputation:
10
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 20, 2018 at 2:44 pm
(April 20, 2018 at 2:42 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Quote:I didn't think you would say anything falsifiable (even though you claim that poly already did the work) If you just want to name call and try to make others small, then back on ignore you go!
That just it poly already did so. So why must i ? And pointing out he beat you is not name calling or belittling it simply stating a fact . But by all means ignore me that won't change the fact Poly proved this very statement wrong and it written for all to see .
Ok... I disagree, and since you cannot show where I'm wrong, then good bye!
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 20, 2018 at 3:10 pm
Quote:Ok... I disagree, and since you cannot show where I'm wrong, then good by
Yes it is okay . Your disagreement is irrelevant. I could but i don't need too poly already did . But goodbye keep being wrong .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 6610
Threads: 73
Joined: May 31, 2014
Reputation:
56
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 20, 2018 at 8:32 pm
(This post was last modified: April 20, 2018 at 8:32 pm by GrandizerII.)
(April 20, 2018 at 11:14 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: (April 18, 2018 at 9:36 pm)Grandizer Wrote: And also don't say an actual infinity is not possible because one can't reach the end of an infinity. That would be like arguing that the immaterial is not possible because one cannot visualize it.
No... that is not at all like the reasoning given for why you cannot reach the end of that which is by definition without end.
And by such reasoning, an actual infinity isn't possible because you can't fully experience it. Hence, my previous post.
(April 20, 2018 at 3:10 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Quote:Ok... I disagree, and since you cannot show where I'm wrong, then good by
Yes it is okay . Your disagreement is irrelevant. I could but i don't need too poly already did . But goodbye keep being wrong .
Indeed.
Posts: 67288
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 21, 2018 at 4:23 am
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2018 at 4:30 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Sometimes, peoples' defensiveness about being made to "look small" is more compelling than any desire or need to have communicated something accurate or true. It's an ideological variant of the sunk cost effect.
Let's try a demonstration.
No one, other than one's self, makes anyone "look small" by stating patently inaccurate things. We all do it, from time to time. It's the easiest thing in the world to say "ah, look at that, I was wrong about that, thanks man." When we can't do that.....-this- is what makes us, or our position, seem small.
What do you think RR? Is holding an inaccurate belief about a triviality important enough to act as a sunk cost for whatever it is you were hoping to communicate in that conversation?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 21, 2018 at 9:54 am
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2018 at 9:56 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Here's an example of dumb rhetoric on the atheist's side "I don't believe there isn't a God... I just lack belief that there is."
First of all it's an absence not a lack.
Second of all you are born not believing in God, but you aren't born believing God is improbable.
Third, do you believe God's probability is unknown or exactly 50/50? I doubt it.
Finally, if you believe that God is improbable in any way, then you do believe there isn't a God, you just don't believe it with absolute certainty.
I was born with a mere absence of belief but then I heard about this ridiculous idea of God and considered it to be improbable for the same reason that anything else that lacks evidence but is absurd is improbable. Fire-breathing dragons are improbable and I certainly don't merely have an absence of belief in them. They could be hiding, I am not absolutely certain that they don't exist. But I do very strongly believe that they don't... and with good reason. Same with God.
Not a fan of Daniel Dennett by any means, he gets on my tits and really grinds my gears, and I recently learned he's a pragmatist... so no wonder (that puts him in the Jordan Peterson camp, yuck.). But still, he got the following absolutely right:
Daniel Dennett Wrote:There's nothing I like less than bad arguments for a view I hold dear.
^ And this is exactly how I feel about this "I don't believe there isn't a God I just lack belief" nonsense. ^
Posts: 3709
Threads: 18
Joined: September 29, 2015
Reputation:
10
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 21, 2018 at 2:17 pm
(April 20, 2018 at 8:32 pm)Grandizer Wrote: (April 20, 2018 at 11:14 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: No... that is not at all like the reasoning given for why you cannot reach the end of that which is by definition without end.
And by such reasoning, an actual infinity isn't possible because you can't fully experience it. Hence, my previous post.
I don't believe that I or Steve have said any such thing (concerning cannot be fully experienced). I think you misunderstand. I would very much be against someone arguing in such a way, using only what can be experienced.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Dumb Rhetoric
April 21, 2018 at 4:39 pm
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2018 at 4:39 pm by Amarok.)
(April 21, 2018 at 9:54 am)Hammy Wrote: Here's an example of dumb rhetoric on the atheist's side "I don't believe there isn't a God... I just lack belief that there is."
First of all it's an absence not a lack.
Second of all you are born not believing in God, but you aren't born believing God is improbable.
Third, do you believe God's probability is unknown or exactly 50/50? I doubt it.
Finally, if you believe that God is improbable in any way, then you do believe there isn't a God, you just don't believe it with absolute certainty.
I was born with a mere absence of belief but then I heard about this ridiculous idea of God and considered it to be improbable for the same reason that anything else that lacks evidence but is absurd is improbable. Fire-breathing dragons are improbable and I certainly don't merely have an absence of belief in them. They could be hiding, I am not absolutely certain that they don't exist. But I do very strongly believe that they don't... and with good reason. Same with God.
Not a fan of Daniel Dennett by any means, he gets on my tits and really grinds my gears, and I recently learned he's a pragmatist... so no wonder (that puts him in the Jordan Peterson camp, yuck.). But still, he got the following absolutely right:
Daniel Dennett Wrote:There's nothing I like less than bad arguments for a view I hold dear.
^ And this is exactly how I feel about this "I don't believe there isn't a God I just lack belief" nonsense. ^ Gotta disagree
And more babbling from Road take a hint man your side lost this debate
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
|