Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 4:25 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Cannabis
#11
RE: Cannabis
My only problem with Cannabis legalisation is that there is no quick test to see if a person is driving under the influence. With Alcohol you just blow in a pipe and that gives a result in seconds, there is no such device for THC.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Reply
#12
RE: Cannabis
(May 17, 2009 at 1:32 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: The problem with cannabis is the way it's taken. It'd be legalised straight away if it were a drink. Alcohol is an A class drug in the UK IIRC.

How do you tell if someone's smoking cannabis and not something a lot stronger? (apart from the consequences). Specialists see that once smoking hard drugs is accepted then there's an easy route in for more serious drugs.

You consider marijuana to be a hard drug?
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful with out having to believe there are fairies at the bottom of it to?" -Douglas Adams.Heart
Pastafarian
I Evolved!
Reply
#13
RE: Cannabis
(May 17, 2009 at 1:41 pm)leo-rcc Wrote: My only problem with Cannabis legalisation is that there is no quick test to see if a person is driving under the influence. With Alcohol you just blow in a pipe and that gives a result in seconds, there is no such device for THC.

Agreed. There's also the possibility that cannabis is more carcinogenic than cigarettes ... I say possibility because I also saw a number of pages on my Google search that claim the opposite (I've honestly no idea which is true).

Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!

Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Reply
#14
RE: Cannabis
(May 17, 2009 at 3:15 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:
(May 17, 2009 at 1:41 pm)leo-rcc Wrote: My only problem with Cannabis legalisation is that there is no quick test to see if a person is driving under the influence. With Alcohol you just blow in a pipe and that gives a result in seconds, there is no such device for THC.

Agreed. There's also the possibility that cannabis is more carcinogenic than cigarettes ... I say possibility because I also saw a number of pages on my Google search that claim the opposite (I've honestly no idea which is true).

Kyu

I don't know either but to me that is a mute point anyway. Most people here in Holland smoke cannabis with Tobacco, so they get both products in their body.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Reply
#15
RE: Cannabis
(May 17, 2009 at 2:57 pm)WWLD Wrote:
(May 17, 2009 at 1:32 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: The problem with cannabis is the way it's taken. It'd be legalised straight away if it were a drink. Alcohol is an A class drug in the UK IIRC.

How do you tell if someone's smoking cannabis and not something a lot stronger? (apart from the consequences). Specialists see that once smoking hard drugs is accepted then there's an easy route in for more serious drugs.

You consider marijuana to be a hard drug?

No.............

Cannabis is way down the scale with soft drugs.

Sorry - I mis-stated: Alcohol on the damage it causes could be classed as class A. Cannabis is over rated at class B ...according to my mates over at the local drugs advisory service.
Reply
#16
RE: Cannabis
(May 17, 2009 at 3:22 pm)leo-rcc Wrote:
(May 17, 2009 at 3:15 pm)Kyuuketsuki Wrote:
(May 17, 2009 at 1:41 pm)leo-rcc Wrote: My only problem with Cannabis legalisation is that there is no quick test to see if a person is driving under the influence. With Alcohol you just blow in a pipe and that gives a result in seconds, there is no such device for THC.

Agreed. There's also the possibility that cannabis is more carcinogenic than cigarettes ... I say possibility because I also saw a number of pages on my Google search that claim the opposite (I've honestly no idea which is true).

Kyu

I don't know either but to me that is a mute point anyway. Most people here in Holland smoke cannabis with Tobacco, so they get both products in their body.

I have heard both too, but I have heard and read MORE that cigarettes are more harmful because they have more tar.

What does everyone think of legalization with and age limit?

I certainly can't imagine it being legal WITHOUT an age limit.
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful with out having to believe there are fairies at the bottom of it to?" -Douglas Adams.Heart
Pastafarian
I Evolved!
Reply
#17
RE: Cannabis
(May 17, 2009 at 3:22 pm)leo-rcc Wrote: I don't know either but to me that is a mute point anyway. Most people here in Holland smoke cannabis with Tobacco, so they get both products in their body.

True ... though I haven't had it for quite a long time I have to say I always quite liked hash (I remember me Bob Marley specials at Poly ... they were fun), not sure if I would so much now since I'm trying hard to be an ex-smoker.

Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!

Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Reply
#18
RE: Cannabis
I've never smoked but have used cannabis in the form of cake.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Reply
#19
RE: Cannabis
As a long time canabis smoker, i'm not really sure if legalisation is the way to go.
For sure, it is not a hard drug, but it cause problems nevertheless.
At a point in my life, i was smoking about 5g of the stuff every single days. And while this is quite a lot imo, i knew (and still knows) people that smoke more.
When my girlfrien gave birth to my daughter, it took my almost a year to break the habit. And at that time, my job was a bad one and i was not gaining that much money, barely enough to pay for all the things childrens and familly needs. But as much as i knew that i did'nt had the money for it, i was still unable to bring myself to quit. Wich mean that while my child never missed anything essential, there was barely enough of it.

Now that i have reduced my consomation to a bearable level, i understand that the harder thing to do was not break the physical dependancy (wich is a very low level one, but still existing contrary to what so-called specialist say) but the psychological one is really strong, for me at teh very least.

But anyway, when every thing is said and done, i think that in fact legalisation would not change much, weed is such an easy drug to obtain that legal or not, if somebody want some, he will get it easily.
The good point about legalistion is that i may help control it's consomation among teen, but i don't really think so, Alcool is 18+ here, and i have been buying in directly from the store since i'm like 12...

As for those who say that driving under the influence of weed is not that bad, i want to ask: Ever tried it?
I did, quite many time, and as an heavy smoker don't have problem doing it after a joint or two. But i remember full well a night where i smoked close to 10g with a friend in the span of a few hours. I was wonderind why everybody where driving SO fast thins night, till a realised some 10 minutes latter that i was the one driving WAY too slowly (about 40Km in a 90Km zone).
Well, it may not be that dangerous driving way to slow in term of big impact, but if i have been able to drive this slowly this long withoput realising it, what else did i did'nt realise about what was going on around me...
Wizard's first ruleTongueeople are stupid; given proper motivation, almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true.
Reply
#20
RE: Cannabis
(May 17, 2009 at 6:26 pm)Madscientist Wrote: As for those who say that driving under the influence of weed is not that bad, i want to ask: Ever tried it?

I don't think anyone here said it is not that bad.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Medical Cannabis clears first hurdle in Kentucky Ryantology 5 1436 March 3, 2014 at 2:56 am
Last Post: Assimilate
  Awsome pro cannabis legalisation activism! Something completely different 5 2166 July 15, 2013 at 10:09 am
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Medicinal use of cannabis legalised in France! Big Blue Sky 7 3655 June 8, 2013 at 2:41 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)