Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 22, 2025, 4:32 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
Do you ever notice that these people for religious freedom tend to only be for religious freedoms that fit within the confines of their own religion?

For example, they're okay with discriminating against Gays. But dare not say Merry Christmas, and they'll have a hissy fit. They're okay with firing gay people for being gay, but you can bet they'd have their boxers in a bunch the second someone was fired for being Christian. It's all a cover to try to make this a "Christian Nation". Honestly, we shouldn't tolerate Christian Bigotry anymore than they tolerate other religions that don't fit within their personal beliefs.
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Reply
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
(June 11, 2018 at 11:31 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I guess the SJW’s will always have fake news!

All out of arguments in favor of bigotry, eh?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
(June 12, 2018 at 1:24 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:
(June 11, 2018 at 11:31 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I guess the SJW’s will always have fake news!

All out of arguments in favor of bigotry, eh?

Tired of trying to reason with people who only have lies and name calling to fall back on!

(June 11, 2018 at 11:47 pm)Cecelia Wrote: Do you ever notice that these people for religious freedom tend to only be for religious freedoms that fit within the confines of their own religion?

For example, they're okay with discriminating against Gays. But dare not say Merry Christmas, and they'll have a hissy fit. They're okay with firing gay people for being gay, but you can bet they'd have their boxers in a bunch the second someone was fired for being Christian. It's all a cover to try to make this a "Christian Nation". Honestly, we shouldn't tolerate Christian Bigotry anymore than they tolerate other religions that don't fit within their personal beliefs.

I for one am for religious freedom for all, as the US was founded on. I’m also for freedom of speech, even when the I disagree with that speech. If anything, what you are describing sounds more like the “tolerant” left to me. About the only time I would support firing someone for their beliefs is when those beliefs go directly against what they are employed for.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man.  - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire.  - Martin Luther
Reply
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
(June 11, 2018 at 11:47 pm)Cecelia Wrote: Do you ever notice that these people for religious freedom tend to only be for religious freedoms that fit within the confines of their own religion?

For example, they're okay with discriminating against Gays.  But dare not say Merry Christmas, and they'll have a hissy fit.  They're okay with firing gay people for being gay, but you can bet they'd have their boxers in a bunch the second someone was fired for being Christian.  It's all a cover to try to make this a "Christian Nation".  Honestly, we shouldn't tolerate Christian Bigotry anymore than they tolerate other religions that don't fit within their personal beliefs.

Time for picket signs?
Reply
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
Every time I read "Colorado Baker" I see this guy in my head.

[Image: a_cowboy.jpg]
Reply
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
We all look like that in Colorado. Men, women, children, pets... Didn't you know? ;D
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
(June 12, 2018 at 5:47 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: We all look like that in Colorado. Men, women, children, pets... Didn't you know? ;D

I have friends in Wyoming that look like that. I like to point out that they've looked like that since they were six years old.
Reply
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
I get the feeling that the bigotry side of Christianity is going to get heavily diluted over the next few generations, both by the church leaders and pew fillers. I think the hippy love wishy washy totally ignoring the bible side is going to get played up more and more.

Whether Islam will follow, I'm not sure. I think it will be a much more gradual decline, if it happens. The Quran is far more rigid and harder to cherry pick, which maybe accounts for Islam seemingly being less compatible with secular societies. I hope I'm wrong here, and that they manage to have a "reformation" like Christianty did, where people are allowed to just ignore what their books say without being criticized by their fellow Muslims.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
I listened to this podcast yesterday "Breakpoint" from the Chuck Colson center; concerning the Masterpiece bake shop decision.
http://www.breakpoint.org/2018/06/bp-thi...ece-means/

A lot of it is discussing what it means that it is a narrow decision, although it had clear majority support.   Towards the end, they also discuss a hardware store which came into the news lately who posted a sign saying "No gays allowed".  They made a distinction between this and the Masterpiece Bake Shop; which, was not saying that he would not sell to same sex attracted people, but was refusing a particular event that he didn't agree with.   Similarly there was another case, with a Florist a little while ago, that had been selling to a gay couple for years, and said that she would continue selling to them, but did not wish to do the flowers for their same sex union (The couple understood and where not even the ones who made a stink about it). 

But these commentator's again clearly condemn the shop that posted a sign that said "No gays".   They call it sinful and hateful.   They did not support this in anyway.  It is not about being against a people or discriminating against them, they deserve the same dignity and respect that everyone does, who is made in the image of God.  It is about being able to refuse a job, which goes against your conscience.      As I've said before;  I think that there are subtleties to how one should and should not be able to discriminate and should be able to refuse a job.   And despite any technicalities I don't see much difference in those who discriminated against the Trump inauguration.   However this type of view is the one I see from most commentators.  You will also find Christians who say that they should just bake the cake, and you will find those who do want to discriminate against the people.  

However, I'm going by what I see most, and at the very least, it should be acknowledged that there are those out there who are making this distinction and do not advocate many of the things ascribed to them in this thread.   Even after being corrected, there where people who continued with the same false narrative.   If you are going to have a rational conversation about things, then you need to listen to what the other side is saying, and to address their points.  Too much seems like the left and the LGBT is just spewing their own emotional bigotry.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man.  - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire.  - Martin Luther
Reply
RE: Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Colorado Baker
Road, the christian right keeps suing in the hope that they will be granted the right to discriminate against gays. I take it that;s not what you want, but it is what they want., and it makes you look like an idiot, or a slimy peice of shit..the more you deny this basic fact of the matter.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 1483 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  Leaked Supreme Court Decision signals majority set to overturn Roe v. Wade Cecelia 234 32300 June 7, 2022 at 11:58 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Colorado shooting, 5 dead. brewer 0 476 December 28, 2021 at 8:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 4884 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Court Ordered Quarantine brewer 2 677 October 24, 2019 at 10:15 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Supreme Court Considers Mandatory Govt Funding of Religious Education EgoDeath 8 1480 September 24, 2019 at 10:37 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Fed Court, "hand over 8yrs of your finances" Brian37 15 2074 May 22, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Round 2 Angrboda 330 37918 August 23, 2018 at 10:13 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Court of Appeals Tells Alabama Shitheads to "Fuck Off!" Minimalist 6 1625 August 23, 2018 at 2:00 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy" Cecelia 69 13163 July 2, 2018 at 10:52 pm
Last Post: Fireball



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)