Posts: 196
Threads: 1
Joined: February 17, 2018
Reputation:
6
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 9:27 pm
(June 15, 2018 at 7:00 pm)CDF47 Wrote: (June 15, 2018 at 6:19 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: Wow. Mendel did not address origins either. Are you simply pretending to be a moron or actually a moron?
ETA: Please provide Darwin's claims about the origin of life. Please provide Mendel's claims about the origin of life. You can't. You are quixote tilting against an imaginary windmill.
They did not know of DNA or molecular machines. They had limited knowledge of life.
(June 18, 2018 at 9:20 pm)CDF47 Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 8:22 pm)sdelsolray Wrote: Reported for plagiarism. This is the second time.
Sources cited.
(June 18, 2018 at 9:14 pm)sdelsolray Wrote: It's the second time he's plagiarized in this thread. He doesn't seem to care. After all, he's the important one, at least according to him.
The sources are posted now so not plagiarism. Also, which post did I claim to be important. Please provide post number.
Oh! You do care. How endearing. You still committed plagiarism, although kudos to you for correcting your mistake.
You self-importance is inferred from dozens and dozens of your posts. Obviously, you have not yet reached the stage of the God Virus disease you are infected with to publicly claim special importance. Nevertheless, early signs of this delusion is strongly inferred from your posts.
It's all part of being full of shit. Keep going, Sparky.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 9:29 pm
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2018 at 9:32 pm by Amarok.)
Quote:They did not know of DNA or molecular machines. They had limited knowledge of life.
Sigh 
(June 18, 2018 at 9:27 pm)sdelsolray Wrote: (June 15, 2018 at 7:00 pm)CDF47 Wrote: They did not know of DNA or molecular machines. They had limited knowledge of life.
(June 18, 2018 at 9:20 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Sources cited.
The sources are posted now so not plagiarism. Also, which post did I claim to be important. Please provide post number.
Oh! You do care. How endearing. You still committed plagiarism, although kudos to you for correcting your mistake.
You self-importance is inferred from dozens and dozens of your posts. Obviously, you have not yet reached the stage of the God Virus disease you are infected with to publicly claim special importance. Nevertheless, early signs of this delusion is strongly inferred from your posts.
It's all part of being full of shit. Keep going, Sparky. Too bad even with citation it's still bollocks
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 2741
Threads: 2
Joined: May 4, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 9:33 pm
(June 18, 2018 at 9:22 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 9:20 pm)CDF47 Wrote: Sources cited.
The sources are posted now so not plagiarism.
Why are you here?
To discuss the creation of DNA and the universe.
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 9:39 pm
(June 18, 2018 at 9:33 pm)CDF47 Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 9:22 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Why are you here?
To discuss the creation of DNA and the universe.
You haven’t done either.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 2741
Threads: 2
Joined: May 4, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 9:44 pm
(June 18, 2018 at 9:39 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 9:33 pm)CDF47 Wrote: To discuss the creation of DNA and the universe.
You haven’t done either.
Sure I have. Quite a bit actually.
Posts: 196
Threads: 1
Joined: February 17, 2018
Reputation:
6
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 9:50 pm
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2018 at 9:53 pm by sdelsolray.)
(June 18, 2018 at 9:33 pm)CDF47 Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 9:22 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Why are you here?
To discuss the creation of DNA and the universe.
I suggest you research the difference between "discussing" and "asserting". You don't seem to understand the difference, at least yet. If you do so, perhaps you will realize that your incessant mere assertions do not constitute discussion in any way whatsoever. For sure, mere assertions probably count as "discussion" among brainwashed theists such as yourself provided listeners exclaim, Hallelujah!!" or "Praise Jesus!!" after each bald claim.
However, here you are dealing with rational thinking adults, not indoctrinated theists.
Know you audience, and act accordingly.
Who knows...you might actually remove some of the shit of which you are completely full. Go for 75%. You can do it. That would be an improvement.
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 9:50 pm
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2018 at 9:52 pm by LadyForCamus.)
(June 18, 2018 at 9:44 pm)CDF47 Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 9:39 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: You haven’t done either.
Sure I have. Quite a bit actually.
Repeating an assertion over and over doesn’t qualify as discussion.
Edit: Ninja’d by sdelsolray! 😋
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 196
Threads: 1
Joined: February 17, 2018
Reputation:
6
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 9:51 pm
(June 18, 2018 at 9:44 pm)CDF47 Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 9:39 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: You haven’t done either.
Sure I have. Quite a bit actually.
A perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Classic.
Posts: 2741
Threads: 2
Joined: May 4, 2018
Reputation:
3
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 10:06 pm
(June 18, 2018 at 9:50 pm)sdelsolray Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 9:33 pm)CDF47 Wrote: To discuss the creation of DNA and the universe.
I suggest you research the difference between "discussing" and "asserting". You don't seem to understand the difference, at least yet. If you do so, perhaps you will realize that your incessant mere assertions do not constitute discussion in any way whatsoever. For sure, mere assertions probably count as "discussion" among brainwashed theists such as yourself provided listeners exclaim, Hallelujah!!" or "Praise Jesus!!" after each bald claim.
However, here you are dealing with rational thinking adults, not indoctrinated theists.
Know you audience, and act accordingly.
Who knows...you might actually remove some of the shit of which you are completely full. Go for 75%. You can do it. That would be an improvement.
Nah, there were discussions as well.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
June 18, 2018 at 10:10 pm
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2018 at 11:09 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(June 18, 2018 at 9:50 pm)sdelsolray Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 9:33 pm)CDF47 Wrote: To discuss the creation of DNA and the universe.
I suggest you research the difference between "discussing" and "asserting". You don't seem to understand the difference, at least yet. If you do so, perhaps you will realize that your incessant mere assertions do not constitute discussion in any way whatsoever. For sure, mere assertions probably count as "discussion" among brainwashed theists such as yourself provided listeners exclaim, Hallelujah!!" or "Praise Jesus!!" after each bald claim.
However, here you are dealing with rational thinking adults, not indoctrinated theists.
Know you audience, and act accordingly.
Who knows...you might actually remove some of the shit of which you are completely full. Go for 75%. You can do it. That would be an improvement.
We are not his audience. He is after souls he can poach, not minds he can convince. To the extent most souls appear to be attached to minds, he is looking for those with minds least capacious, most needy, most wishthinking and thus most likely to reassure his own.
|
