DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[sdelsolray]

I suggest you research the difference between "discussing" and "asserting".  You don't seem to understand the difference, at least yet.  If you do so, perhaps you will realize that your incessant mere assertions do not constitute discussion in any way whatsoever.  For sure, mere assertions probably count as "discussion" among brainwashed theists such as yourself provided listeners exclaim, Hallelujah!!" or "Praise Jesus!!" after each bald claim.

However, here you are dealing with rational thinking adults, not indoctrinated theists.

Know you audience, and act accordingly.

Who knows...you might actually remove some of the shit of which you are completely full.  Go for 75%.  You can do it.  That would be an improvement.

Nah, there were discussions as well.

Since you can't tell the difference between discussion and mere assertion, you do not presently have the ability to know whether you were involved in any discussions.

Making shit up, which you frequently do, is one of he reasons you are full of shit.  Stop doing that, and you will begin to heal at least that infirmary.

[Amarok]

You haven’t done either.

Sure I have.  Quite a bit actually.

Nope assertions yes 

Discussions not really

[The Grand Nudger]

Why are you here?

To discuss the creation of DNA and the universe.

Do you think that this is an important subject that deserves level honesty and a commitment to accurate statements and positions?

[Ravenshire]

I find it absolutely hilarious that this CDFucknut47 character keeps quoting me even though I've stated clearly and repeatedly that it's on my ignore list.

[CDF47]

To discuss the creation of DNA and the universe.

Do you think that this is an important subject that deserves level honesty and a commitment to accurate statements and positions?

Absolutely.

[The Grand Nudger]

Then perhaps you should try to engage with much more of that?

[CDF47]

Then perhaps you should try to engage with much more of that?

That's all I have done.

[The Grand Nudger]

Just in this short exchange you;ve given another example of why no one takes you (or by extension your god) seriously.   You;ve made a litany of factually incorrect statements multiple times, and each time have been shown not only that they are fatuous, but why.  The factual reality of biology ought to be informing you about your alleged god. It can't be based on nothing other than a rejection of reality and still..with a straight face, be said to be real in any sensible way.

So, as I;ve suggested before..if this god business of yours is serious business, and you have a commitment to integrity in it, then you might find it useful to fundamentally alter your approach. Otherwise, you'll continually be written off as a lunatic or a liar...and lunatics aren;t nearly as common as the other thing.

[Nay_Sayer]

Then perhaps you should try to engage with much more of that?

That's all I have done.

!Fact! If your skin were laid flat it would cover an area of 18 square feet.

[Astreja]

The symbols are defined in the Bible itself.  Below are a list of the symbols and their references in the Bible:  {snip link}

I reject your interpretation, as I think the Bible is a piece of trash.  I prefer my version.