First order logic, set theory and God

[Amarok]

I can compress them, but I choose not to.  I use extra detail because I'm considering potential objections and eliminating them as best as possible before someone tries to create a whammy on a technicality.  In this setting, it's a good idea.

Yeah no 

Or you could simply meet objections as they come and why on earth anyone care about Whammy's if they can be they are easily eliminated. Sorry this explanation does not hold water .

[T0 Th3 M4X]

I can compress them, but I choose not to.  I use extra detail because I'm considering potential objections and eliminating them as best as possible before someone tries to create a whammy on a technicality.  In this setting, it's a good idea.

Yeah no 

Or you could simply meet objections as they come and why on earth anyone care about Whammy's if they can be they are easily eliminated. Sorry this explanation does not hold water .

I don't need your validation. (Hope that was short enough for ya)

[Amarok]

Yeah no 

Or you could simply meet objections as they come and why on earth anyone care about Whammy's if they can be they are easily eliminated. Sorry this explanation does not hold water .

I don't need your validation. (Hope that was short enough for ya)

Yes you don't . Too bad nothing i have said indicates you do . It won't stop me from observing and drawing conclusions on them . And for a man who does not care you sure invested a lot into not caring .

[LastPoet]

I can compress them, but I choose not to.  I use extra detail because I'm considering potential objections and eliminating them as best as possible before someone tries to create a whammy on a technicality.  In this setting, it's a good idea.

You should be honest and just say we are not at your high level of thought. Its one of those things, aint it?

[T0 Th3 M4X]

I don't need your validation. (Hope that was short enough for ya)

Yes you don't . Too bad nothing i have said indicates you do . It won't stop me from observing and drawing conclusions on them . And for a man who does not care you sure invested a lot into not caring .

I care about life and learning. I don't care about arguments.

[Amarok]

Yes you don't . Too bad nothing i have said indicates you do . It won't stop me from observing and drawing conclusions on them . And for a man who does not care you sure invested a lot into not caring .

I care about life and learning. I don't care about arguments.

And yet here you are arguing ....

And that implies those things are exclusive

[T0 Th3 M4X]

I care about life and learning. I don't care about arguments.

And yet here you are arguing ....

And that implies those things are exclusive

I'm not here to argue.  I've also had discussions with people and no arguing was necessary or included. That doesn't mean I can't end up in an "argument" with someone else.  Regardless, I'm not bound by those arguments, but rather my own.  Still my preference is civil conversation with a respect for learning and to the parties involved.

[Amarok]

And yet here you are arguing ....

And that implies those things are exclusive

I'm not here to argue.  I've also had discussions with people and no arguing was necessary or included. That doesn't mean I can't end up in an "argument" with someone else.  Regardless, I'm not bound by those arguments, but rather my own.  Still my preference is civil conversation with a respect for learning and to the parties involved.

And yet the arguments you wind up in you clearly care about otherwise you would not engage in them

[T0 Th3 M4X]

I'm not here to argue.  I've also had discussions with people and no arguing was necessary or included. That doesn't mean I can't end up in an "argument" with someone else.  Regardless, I'm not bound by those arguments, but rather my own.  Still my preference is civil conversation with a respect for learning and to the parties involved.

And yet the arguments you wind up in you clearly care about otherwise you would not engage in them

If someone joins a discussion and they start making claims, I don't know if they intend to argue.  I don't have to participate, but why should I end the conversation because someone new shows up?  I could conceivably walk away, but that doens't mean I'm going to.  My preference is not to argue, but you don't always get you want in life, and I don't get a special exception. Sometimes it's not just "one or the other" but rather dealing with things as they come.

[Amarok]

And yet the arguments you wind up in you clearly care about otherwise you would not engage in them

If someone joins a discussion and they start making claims, I don't know if they intend to argue.  I don't have to participate, but why should I end the conversation because someone new shows up?  I could conceivably walk away, but that doens't mean I'm going to.  My preference is not to argue, but you don't always get you want in life, and I don't get a special exception. Sometimes it's not just "one or the other" but rather dealing with things as they come.

That still does not address the fact that you clearly still care enough to continue and respond .