DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

Sure there is.  The kingdoms are easy to identify.  I listed them in a post above.

No there isn't and you post solved nothing

---

Twas the magic pop rocks that appeared out of nowhere.  Didn't you get the memo?

An argument nobody has stated

---

We all come from different backgrounds and have a reason for thinking the way we do.  Sometimes we get things right and other times we make mistakes.  Such is life.  We learn more in life by working together though and not assuming everybody is bad who thinks differently.

No to all the above

Yes, on pretty much everything.

---

The Lord obviously never came to earth during the lifetimes of the four monarchs as per Daniel 2:44, and his kingdom was never established in Israel to rule forever. Sorry, but you fail.

The really tiresome bit, imo at least..is that if we just let daniel be daniel....instead of trying to baptize him posthumously as a christer prophet...we could at least say that he may have seen one thing clearly in his own time, a thing that others didn't (to their own detriment).  The rise of rome.

But no...lol...no....leave it to the faithful to dickpunch their own magic book so that it always has to say the dumbest and most inaccurate thing possible.

Christ (the Son of man) are prophesied in the Book of Daniel.

[Amarok]

No there isn't and you post solved nothing

---

An argument nobody has stated

---

No to all the above

Yes, on pretty much everything.

---

The really tiresome bit, imo at least..is that if we just let daniel be daniel....instead of trying to baptize him posthumously as a christer prophet...we could at least say that he may have seen one thing clearly in his own time, a thing that others didn't (to their own detriment).  The rise of rome.

But no...lol...no....leave it to the faithful to dickpunch their own magic book so that it always has to say the dumbest and most inaccurate thing possible.

Christ (the Son of man) are prophesied in the Book of Daniel.

Nope

---

No there isn't and you post solved nothing

---

An argument nobody has stated

---

No to all the above

Yes, on pretty much everything.

---

The really tiresome bit, imo at least..is that if we just let daniel be daniel....instead of trying to baptize him posthumously as a christer prophet...we could at least say that he may have seen one thing clearly in his own time, a thing that others didn't (to their own detriment).  The rise of rome.

But no...lol...no....leave it to the faithful to dickpunch their own magic book so that it always has to say the dumbest and most inaccurate thing possible.

Christ (the Son of man) are prophesied in the Book of Daniel.

Nope

[CDF47]

You didn't provide much feedback in a summary on the article.

The historical Christ was detailed in that article.  Christ is an historical figure.  The Holy Bible claims Him to be the Son of God.

These are excellent prophecies and that was referring to Christ.

He didn't need too 

There was no historical Christ as far as the evince is concerned 

And no there are not

He didn't have to but some detail would have been good.  I couldn't even tell he read the article.

Yes, there was.

And, yes, they are

---

I saw the controversies but the kingdoms I listed in my post above are clearly the kingdoms referred to in the Book of Daniel.  There are controversies over everything.

Nope the controversies reduce this too nothing 

Where are you getting this four monarchs from.  He was to be alive during Rome's rule.  Provide the verse on the established kingdom in Israel.  Christianity is spiritual Israel for Jew and Gentile.

Rubbish

No, they do not.  How so?  Explain the controversies.  

Truth.

---

Yes, on pretty much everything.

---

Christ (the Son of man) are prophesied in the Book of Daniel.

Nope

---

Yes, on pretty much everything.

---

Christ (the Son of man) are prophesied in the Book of Daniel.

Nope

I could give you chapter and verse where Daniel speaks of the Messiah being cut off during one of his many predictions of the future.

[Amarok]

Nope to all the above

[The Grand Nudger]

Christ (the Son of man) are prophesied in the Book of Daniel.

Maybe you should ask a jew? It can't have escaped you that they don't believe in your christer nonsense in the slightest, can it?  Do you really think that a jewish narrator in the 6th century bce was talking about some pagan godman that you believe in due to hellenic syncretism?

Take a deep breath and consider the absurdity of your beliefs about old magic book, if that's the case..even if only for a moment.

[CDF47]

Christ (the Son of man) are prophesied in the Book of Daniel.

Maybe you should ask a jew? It can't have escaped you that they don't believe in your christer nonsense in the slightest, can it?  Do you really think that a jewish narrator in the 6th century bce was talking about some pagan godman that you believe in due to hellenic syncretism?

Take a deep breath and consider the absurdity of your beliefs about  old magic book, if that's the case..even if only for a moment.

God knows all time and can and does give information through dreams and visions to His prophets.

[The Grand Nudger]

That has what to do with how and why a 6th century jewish narrator would express himself?

Nothing.  Precisely nothing. The amusing bit is that there are..ofc, nutball jews who also think that daniel was prophecy...but since it was -jewish- prophecy..it has nothing whatsoever to do with pagan godmen like your christ. They've been telling heathens like yourself that you have old magic book wrong for as like as you've been getting it wrong.

[Angrboda]

[CDF47]

That has what to do with how and why a 6th century jewish narrator would express himself?

Nothing.  Precisely nothing.  The amusing bit is that there are..ofc, nutball jews who also think that daniel was prophecy...but since it was -jewish- prophecy..it has nothing whatsoever to do with pagan godmen like your christ.  They've been telling heathens like yourself that you have old magic book wrong for as like as you've been getting it wrong.

They are wrong.  On the first page of the Bible it says, Let "us" create man in "our" image,...  This shows a relationship within God on the first page (which turns out to be the Trinity or Godhead).  This is just one example.

---

 

LOL...Can you toke and type?

[Angrboda]

 

LOL...Can you toke and type?

I don't toke. lol. Pot just makes me paranoid and depressed. Haven't had it in years.