Posts: 2020
Threads: 133
Joined: July 26, 2017
Reputation:
5
Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 12:45 pm
What do you guys here think, what is the best argument against the existence of the soul (and therefore ghosts and afterlives)?
I used to think that the "Damage of the middle of the brain leads to two distinct personalities governing halves of the body." was an argument that would convince anybody, but, evidently, it won't. See here:
How do people who believe in souls explain away the fact that epileptic patients who have the middle of their brain severed appear to have two distinct personalities governing halves of their bodies?
In short, people respond with "Where is some reliable source for that claim?", and, to be honest, I am not sure what would be a reliable source for this. My psychology textbook saying that isn't really good evidence that's true, is it? I mean, my Croatian history textbook tells me most scientists agree Global Flood really happened.
Perhaps the best response to that is "And where is some reliable source of the claims about Maria's Shoe, and other things that supposedly prove the existence of soul?", what do you think?
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 12:52 pm
Bring me a pound, inch, or gallon of soul - and THEN we will consider what one is.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 1:03 pm
(September 1, 2019 at 12:45 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: What do you guys here think, what is the best argument against the existence of the soul (and therefore ghosts and afterlives)?
I used to think that the "Damage of the middle of the brain leads to two distinct personalities governing halves of the body." was an argument that would convince anybody, but, evidently, it won't. See here:
How do people who believe in souls explain away the fact that epileptic patients who have the middle of their brain severed appear to have two distinct personalities governing halves of their bodies?
In short, people respond with "Where is some reliable source for that claim?", and, to be honest, I am not sure what would be a reliable source for this. My psychology textbook saying that isn't really good evidence that's true, is it? I mean, my Croatian history textbook tells me most scientists agree Global Flood really happened.
Perhaps the best response to that is "And where is some reliable source of the claims about Maria's Shoe, and other things that supposedly prove the existence of soul?", what do you think?
The best argument against soul is the same argument against any figment of imagination for which there’s neither any sort of evidence nor even minimally credible argument for it whatsoever - there is neither any sort of evidence nor minimally credible argumenr for it whatsoever.
Posts: 3254
Threads: 179
Joined: April 29, 2012
Reputation:
24
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 1:13 pm
Whare is the soul supposed to be located in the body, and how can you tell?
Is there a big bank of souls foating around just waiting to slot into a new born body?
The idea just seems silly
The meek shall inherit the Earth, the rest of us will fly to the stars.
Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups
Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud ..... after a while you realise that the pig likes it!
Posts: 9915
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation:
92
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 1:46 pm
“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”
No argument necessary.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Posts: 1006
Threads: 10
Joined: January 10, 2019
Reputation:
3
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 1:46 pm
(September 1, 2019 at 12:45 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: What do you guys here think, what is the best argument against the existence of the soul (and therefore ghosts and afterlives)?
That we’re just molecules in motion. Moist robots.
Posts: 280
Threads: 1
Joined: July 8, 2017
Reputation:
9
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 2:16 pm
(September 1, 2019 at 1:46 pm)Acrobat Wrote: (September 1, 2019 at 12:45 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: What do you guys here think, what is the best argument against the existence of the soul (and therefore ghosts and afterlives)?
That we’re just molecules in motion. Moist robots.
Machines of meat!
http://www.eastoftheweb.com/short-storie...Made.shtml
Posts: 16950
Threads: 461
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 3:05 pm
Let's see
Quote:Non-Scientologists Joel Sappell and Robert Welkos described in a 1990 article in the LA Times how Scientologists believe that when a person dies—or, in Scientology terms, when a thetan abandons its physical body—they go to a "landing station" on the planet Venus, where the thetan is re-implanted and told lies about its past life and its next life. The Venusians take the thetan, "capsule" it, and send it back to Earth to be thrown into the ocean off the coast of California. They quote Hubbard as saying, "If you can get out of that, and through that, and wander around through the cities and find some girl who looks like she is going to get married or have a baby or something like that, you're all set. And if you can find the maternity ward to a hospital or something, you're OK. And you just eventually just pick up a baby."
How do I debunk that?
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Posts: 46113
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 3:16 pm
Since theists are so fond of redefining simple words to suit their own ends, I shall emulate them and redefine 'soul' as the sum total of an individual's memories and experiences.
Souls exist.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 28316
Threads: 523
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 1, 2019 at 6:01 pm
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
|