Posts: 2380
Threads: 43
Joined: October 30, 2017
Reputation:
48
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 27, 2019 at 4:28 pm
(September 27, 2019 at 4:24 pm)possibletarian Wrote: (September 27, 2019 at 4:00 pm)Cod Wrote: It's on the bottom of your foot apparently.
And you have two of them, so i don't see what the problem is in defining the soul he he 
I'd hate it if my name was Ronald Soul. Imagine getting letters addressed to Mr R Sole. That's nearly as bad as being Richard Swipe.
Posts: 2080
Threads: 63
Joined: June 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Arguments against Soul
September 30, 2019 at 8:37 am
(This post was last modified: September 30, 2019 at 8:37 am by EgoDeath.)
Here's @ Belaqua
His response will be, "Which one am I supposed to be?"
If you're frightened of dying, and you're holding on, you'll see devils tearing your life away. But if you've made your peace, then the devils are really angels, freeing you from the Earth.
Posts: 38
Threads: 4
Joined: January 5, 2019
Reputation:
0
RE: Arguments against Soul
October 27, 2019 at 3:00 pm
Isn't concept of soul is 10 000 years old or more?
Posts: 2755
Threads: 8
Joined: November 28, 2014
Reputation:
22
RE: Arguments against Soul
October 27, 2019 at 4:06 pm
At work.
(October 27, 2019 at 3:00 pm)GGG Wrote: Isn't concept of soul is 10 000 years old or more?
Most probably.
The Ancient Egyptian mythos goes back quite aways as does their civilization.
Cheers!
Posts: 46113
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Arguments against Soul
October 27, 2019 at 4:50 pm
(September 27, 2019 at 4:28 pm)Cod Wrote: (September 27, 2019 at 4:24 pm)possibletarian Wrote: And you have two of them, so i don't see what the problem is in defining the soul he he
I'd hate it if my name was Ronald Soul. Imagine getting letters addressed to Mr R Sole. That's nearly as bad as being Richard Swipe.
I actually knew a bloke called Willy Wakker.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 2872
Threads: 8
Joined: October 4, 2017
Reputation:
22
RE: Arguments against Soul
October 27, 2019 at 5:25 pm
(October 27, 2019 at 4:50 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (September 27, 2019 at 4:28 pm)Cod Wrote: I'd hate it if my name was Ronald Soul. Imagine getting letters addressed to Mr R Sole. That's nearly as bad as being Richard Swipe.
I actually knew a bloke called Willy Wakker.
Boru
Years ago, I had a department (not mine) who had a supplier of high end audio gear called Joe King. This reached a pinnacle of hilarity when he brought in a assistant called Mickey Staines.
Posts: 2380
Threads: 43
Joined: October 30, 2017
Reputation:
48
RE: Arguments against Soul
October 28, 2019 at 4:19 am
(October 27, 2019 at 5:25 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: (October 27, 2019 at 4:50 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I actually knew a bloke called Willy Wakker.
Boru
Years ago, I had a department (not mine) who had a supplier of high end audio gear called Joe King. This reached a pinnacle of hilarity when he brought in a assistant called Mickey Staines.
Do you remember that Irish politician Dick Spring?.. Always made me chuckle when he was on the news.
Here's another 
Posts: 125
Threads: 0
Joined: November 13, 2019
Reputation:
0
RE: Arguments against Soul
November 13, 2019 at 4:32 pm
(September 1, 2019 at 12:45 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: What do you guys here think, what is the best argument against the existence of the soul (and therefore ghosts and afterlives)?
I used to think that the "Damage of the middle of the brain leads to two distinct personalities governing halves of the body." was an argument that would convince anybody, but, evidently, it won't. See here:
How do people who believe in souls explain away the fact that epileptic patients who have the middle of their brain severed appear to have two distinct personalities governing halves of their bodies?
In short, people respond with "Where is some reliable source for that claim?", and, to be honest, I am not sure what would be a reliable source for this. My psychology textbook saying that isn't really good evidence that's true, is it? I mean, my Croatian history textbook tells me most scientists agree Global Flood really happened.
Perhaps the best response to that is "And where is some reliable source of the claims about Maria's Shoe, and other things that supposedly prove the existence of soul?", what do you think?
NEARLY ALL HISTORIANS AND SCHOLARS AGREE THAT THERE WAS A MAN CALLED JESUS AND HE WAS CRUIFIED.
Posts: 46113
Threads: 538
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Arguments against Soul
November 13, 2019 at 5:11 pm
(November 13, 2019 at 4:32 pm)Prycejosh1987 Wrote: (September 1, 2019 at 12:45 pm)FlatAssembler Wrote: What do you guys here think, what is the best argument against the existence of the soul (and therefore ghosts and afterlives)?
I used to think that the "Damage of the middle of the brain leads to two distinct personalities governing halves of the body." was an argument that would convince anybody, but, evidently, it won't. See here:
How do people who believe in souls explain away the fact that epileptic patients who have the middle of their brain severed appear to have two distinct personalities governing halves of their bodies?
In short, people respond with "Where is some reliable source for that claim?", and, to be honest, I am not sure what would be a reliable source for this. My psychology textbook saying that isn't really good evidence that's true, is it? I mean, my Croatian history textbook tells me most scientists agree Global Flood really happened.
Perhaps the best response to that is "And where is some reliable source of the claims about Maria's Shoe, and other things that supposedly prove the existence of soul?", what do you think?
NEARLY ALL HISTORIANS AND SCHOLARS AGREE THAT THERE WAS A MAN CALLED JESUS AND HE WAS CRUIFIED.
How exactly does one get 'cruified'? Is it something to do with salad dressing?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 67190
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Arguments against Soul
November 13, 2019 at 5:47 pm
Bit like agreeing there was a guy named joe who drank beer.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
|
