Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 21, 2024, 10:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Creationism
#11
RE: Creationism
Quote:Asking "if everything has a creator, then what created God?" is a lot like asking "if people evolved from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?" The question shows that you don't understand the argument.
 No the later is stupid the former is right on the button 


Quote:Granted, the straw man version is a lot more convenient.
It's strawman if you don't like the argument
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#12
RE: Creationism
Problem goes away if one claims the god is eternal.

Of course, that just raises fresh problems.
Reply
#13
RE: Creationism
(August 10, 2020 at 5:06 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(August 10, 2020 at 4:10 pm)Belacqua Wrote: Asking "if everything has a creator, then what created God?" is a lot like asking "if people evolved from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?" The question shows that you don't understand the argument. 

Granted, the straw man version is a lot more convenient.

1) Theists don't adequately make the case for God having existed forever (other than definitionally and via a rather shaky appeal to infinite regress) and 2) This is nowhere near establishing a theistic god.

Boru

You understand it better than Eleven, but there's a lot you don't.

No one claims that a first cause argument gets you to the God of the Bible.
Reply
#14
RE: Creationism
(August 10, 2020 at 5:22 pm)Belacqua Wrote:
(August 10, 2020 at 5:06 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: 1) Theists don't adequately make the case for God having existed forever (other than definitionally and via a rather shaky appeal to infinite regress) and 2) This is nowhere near establishing a theistic god.

Boru

You understand it better than Eleven, but there's a lot you don't.

No one claims that a first cause argument gets you to the God of the Bible.

I didn’t say it gets you to the god of the Bible, I said that it doesn’t establish a theistic god.

And William Lane Craig (among others) makes the claim that the argument DOES get you to the god of the Bible. Perhaps you should take it up with him.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#15
RE: Creationism
Quote:No one claims that a first cause argument gets you to the God of the Bible.
And yet just about every apologist brings up the bible in the same lecture/debate were the kalam is discussed 

Yup total coincidence Dodgy
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#16
RE: Creationism
(August 10, 2020 at 5:06 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(August 10, 2020 at 4:10 pm)Belacqua Wrote: Asking "if everything has a creator, then what created God?" is a lot like asking "if people evolved from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?" The question shows that you don't understand the argument. 

Granted, the straw man version is a lot more convenient.

I agree it's a strawman, but it's also a case of special pleading

Atheists tend to frame the argument as, 'If everything that exists had a cause, then God must have a cause', which theists haven't argued since Aristotle made his case for an uncaused cause.

The proper argument is, 'Everything that began to exist must have a cause.  God is eternal and so does not require a cause, since God has always existed.'  This form of the argument is rife with its own problems, since 1) Theists don't adequately make the case for God having existed forever (other than definitionally and via a rather shaky appeal to infinite regress) and 2) This is nowhere near establishing a theistic god.

Boru

My conclusion, this philosophical theistic argument fails.

Tell us all again what I don't understand Bel. Or is it just that I don't understand it the way that you need me to understand it to prop you up.

(August 10, 2020 at 5:22 pm)Belacqua Wrote: You understand it better than Eleven, but there's a lot you don't.

Your hubris is boundless.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#17
RE: Creationism
(August 10, 2020 at 6:04 pm)brewer Wrote:
(August 10, 2020 at 5:06 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I agree it's a strawman, but it's also a case of special pleading

Atheists tend to frame the argument as, 'If everything that exists had a cause, then God must have a cause', which theists haven't argued since Aristotle made his case for an uncaused cause.

The proper argument is, 'Everything that began to exist must have a cause.  God is eternal and so does not require a cause, since God has always existed.'  This form of the argument is rife with its own problems, since 1) Theists don't adequately make the case for God having existed forever (other than definitionally and via a rather shaky appeal to infinite regress) and 2) This is nowhere near establishing a theistic god.

Boru

My conclusion, this philosophical theistic argument fails.

Tell us all again what I don't understand Bel. Or is it just that I don't understand it the way that you need me to understand it to prop you up.

(August 10, 2020 at 5:22 pm)Belacqua Wrote: You understand it better than Eleven, but there's a lot you don't.

Your hubris is boundless.

Kinda funny how we’re excoriated by Bel for thinking we know what Christians believe, but it’s perfectly OK for Bel to tell us how much we understand.

Funny, funny, funny.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#18
RE: Creationism
(August 10, 2020 at 6:21 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(August 10, 2020 at 6:04 pm)brewer Wrote: My conclusion, this philosophical theistic argument fails.

Tell us all again what I don't understand Bel. Or is it just that I don't understand it the way that you need me to understand it to prop you up.


Your hubris is boundless.

Kinda funny how we’re excoriated by Bel for thinking we know what Christians believe, but it’s perfectly OK for Bel to tell us how much we understand.

Funny, funny, funny.

Boru

The "there's a lot you don't understand" comment means there's a lot you don't understand or you'd come to the same conclusion as Bel.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
#19
RE: Creationism
Hubris? Meh. Bel's a feckless troll, not a person for whom hubris is an issue.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#20
RE: Creationism
(August 10, 2020 at 6:21 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:
(August 10, 2020 at 6:04 pm)brewer Wrote: My conclusion, this philosophical theistic argument fails.

Tell us all again what I don't understand Bel. Or is it just that I don't understand it the way that you need me to understand it to prop you up.


Your hubris is boundless.

Kinda funny how we’re excoriated by Bel for thinking we know what Christians believe, but it’s perfectly OK for Bel to tell us how much we understand.

Funny, funny, funny.

Boru
He's arrogance that pretends it humble
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A theory about Creationism leaders Lucanus 24 8079 October 17, 2017 at 8:51 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Science Vs. The Forces of Creationism ScienceAf 15 3568 August 30, 2016 at 12:04 am
Last Post: Arkilogue
  Defending Young-Earth Creationism Scientifically JonDarbyXIII 42 12150 January 14, 2015 at 4:07 am
Last Post: Jacob(smooth)
  creationism belief makes you a sicko.. profanity alert for you sensitive girly men heathendegenerate 4 2182 May 7, 2014 at 12:00 am
Last Post: heathendegenerate
  Creationism in UK Schools Chuff 10 5848 August 3, 2012 at 9:50 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko
  Foundational Falsehood of Creationism Gooders1002 10 8002 May 23, 2012 at 5:37 pm
Last Post: The Heff
  Lewis Black on creationism orogenicman 7 4079 April 14, 2012 at 9:04 am
Last Post: fuckass365
  Creationism Liu Bei mixed with Leondias 77 20097 September 20, 2011 at 1:49 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  The Opie and Anthony Show Tackles Creationism darkblight 0 1476 May 30, 2011 at 11:11 pm
Last Post: darkblight
  Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd) Sam 358 279333 March 3, 2011 at 2:07 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)