World without religion would just be replaced with Authoritartian socialism

[Katastroph2]

Thats what the void would fill. It would influence the government and stateist level. Honestly cultural Christians or Muslims is fine. The problem is the devotion culture such as Catholicism or Sunni Islam, since devotion cultures is about devotion and it limits people to find answers in different things. So getting that on governmental level is bad. Just as if Atheism took over they would simply let Authoritarian socialism replace it. So competition is needed, which is also why religion is needed just like criticism of it is needed. But work culture that Protestants or Secularists made is what has made governments work the way it is today

Otherwise you would just rely on state authoritarian mentality of enemy view points. Just like ancient rome and such. Basically anyone who goes against the state is the enemy, so it wouldnt be utopia it would just be oppression.

Other than that, i made a new cult. God of Obvious Good and Evil, the idea is to promote obvious good and avoid obvious evil, only added rule is cannibalism is illegal in all circumstances. Since atheists online try to argue that its ok to eat human cannibalistic roadkill. So thats one problem solved.

But believing in a spirit of will and conformity of a cultural root value is helpful to make stuff happen. Otherwise you will just lie in a coach and blame everything bad in USA on religion, and not the flawed two party system where lobbyists and centralized voting sells people out. And rather try not voting for a totalitarian socialist change, or rather go with social democrats, left wingers or right wing... depending what you feel is needed? 3rd party is either case derogatory for parties. But two party system does seem to be the problem in USA. And often atheists there blame it on religious people or just inbred people from south to feel better about themselves and the lack to do research for whatever reason

[Rev. Rye]

What the Hell, I’ll just ask: how do you even define socialism? Because I see it as a system where the means of production are controlled by the workers.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Banned this sock.

Boru

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

Well..... I hope they find their mate. T'would be sad for them to forever be an odd one out.

[Angrboda]

At work.

 Well..... I hope they find their mate. T'would be sad for them to forever be an odd one out.

Fixt.

[Ferrocyanide]

The thing that I have noticed with judaism, christianity, islam is that they have a “We Are Right” attitude.
What I mean by that is that they are absolutely, ultra sure that they are right, that their way is the absolute truth. On top of that, they have a system kind of like a company has team leaders, then you have a leader over the team leaders, then you have VP over them and the top dude is the CEO.
The top guys in these religions have taken it upon themselves that they need to cleans society by burning or stoning certain members of society that don’t follow their rules.

They are absolutely sure that what they are doing is the right thing.

“Atheism took over they would simply let Authoritarian socialism replace it.”

==Atheism can’t take over. It isn’t a political plan. It isn’t a religion. It is a nothing.

I guess you are talking about communism, more specifically the examples of communism are Soviet Russia (Stalin), China (Mao), North Korea.
Somehow, the people placed at the top were the wrong people. They turned out to be comfortable with violence and probably they have that “We Are Right” mentality.

A recent example is Donald Trump. It was the first time that I have watched so much a narcissist. It was lies upon lies. The first few days in office and he was giving executive order after  executive order as if he alone is the ruler.

You have to be careful who you place in power.
You also need the ability to remove that person. A good example is Donald Trump. They could not remove him since I think you need 60% of the votes.

There is a certain person voted into office in Canada. He is from the Liberal party. He is being accused of sexual misconduct or is found guilty or something. Nobody can remove him.

“only added rule is cannibalism is illegal”

==Why?

“Since atheists online try to argue that its ok to eat human cannibalistic roadkill.”

==Let’s hear the arguments.

“But believing in a spirit of will and conformity of a cultural root value is helpful to make stuff happen.”

==I don’t know what “spirit of will” is.

[Ahriman]

Atheism can’t take over. It isn’t a political plan. It isn’t a religion. It is a nothing.

Why do people pretend this is true.......atheism is definitely something. Atheists are all unified, in the sense that they all adhere to an atheistic world view. They certainly have enough influence to change the world.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Nope not even close

[Pat Mustard]

Atheism can’t take over. It isn’t a political plan. It isn’t a religion. It is a nothing.

Why do people pretend this is true.......atheism is definitely something. Atheists are all unified, in the sense that they all adhere to an atheistic world view. They certainly have enough influence to change the world.

Fuck off back to stormfront and stop polluting this forum.

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

Atheism can’t take over. It isn’t a political plan. It isn’t a religion. It is a nothing.

Why do people pretend this is true.......(1) atheism is definitely something. (2) Atheists are all unified, in the sense that they all adhere to an atheistic world view. (3) They certainly have enough influence to change the world.

1) Well... within a certain definition this is as true as "All cats are felines". Other than that you're welcome to try hearding either group.

2) see answer to (1) above.

(3) Possibly. Is Elon Musk an atheist? Will his rocketry, if successful change humanity's relation to the cosmos?

Cheers.