Posts: 30715
Threads: 2123
Joined: May 24, 2012
Reputation:
71
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 20, 2021 at 9:05 am
That jury was stacked from the start.
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 20, 2021 at 9:15 am
Still miffed that I called you old, eh?
Sorry.
But it' s just gonna get worse......
Older......
Posts: 29354
Threads: 115
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 20, 2021 at 9:56 am
You are totally clueless. I could care less that someone calls me old. I am old. Just another example of you being wrong.
Posts: 45663
Threads: 536
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 20, 2021 at 1:27 pm
(November 20, 2021 at 8:58 am)onlinebiker Wrote: (November 20, 2021 at 8:55 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I’ve been looking, and this is the only protest I could find regarding the verdict. It was 2200 miles away and appears to have been completely peaceful.
Boru
It' s amazing what cold weather and 500 National Guard troops do to " dedication to the cause".
You’re the one who said ‘the riots start at dusk’. Did you fail to take weather and the Guard into account when you said it?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 45663
Threads: 536
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 20, 2021 at 1:32 pm
(November 20, 2021 at 9:05 am)Brian37 Wrote: That jury was stacked from the start.
Do you have any evidence to support that idiotic assertion?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 45663
Threads: 536
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
November 20, 2021 at 2:54 pm
(November 20, 2021 at 2:29 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: (November 20, 2021 at 1:27 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: You’re the one who said ‘the riots start at dusk’. Did you fail to take weather and the Guard into account when you said it?
Boru
Wtf?
You have never heard of a rhetorical statement?
If I meant it as a prediction - don'tcha think I would preface it so?
I started it off at the OP by saying " I would be surprised if he was convicted of the greater charges"
See me crowing about predicting it?
No?
Why?
( altogether now)
IT WAS A RHETORICAL STATEMENT!
(November 20, 2021 at 1:32 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Do you have any evidence to support that idiotic assertion?
Boru
He didn' t get the verdict he wanted to see.
Therefore the jury is either stupid, corrupt or hand picked by the evil other
......
Don' t you know nuthin'?
If it was meant as rhetorical, why did you try to defend it?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax