Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

[Neo-Scholastic]

By the logic of this thread anyone crossing state lines to visit family for Thankgiving, have no business being there and must be racists.

[Angrboda]

By the logic of this thread anyone crossing state lines to visit family for Thankgiving, have no business being there and must be racists.

Been tipping back a few, have we? *wink* *wink*

I assume you're capable of looking up what a false analogy is.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

By the logic of this thread anyone crossing state lines to visit family for Thankgiving, have no business being there and must be racists.

Really? THAT’S what you’ve got from all this? How about, ‘By the logic of this thread, anyone crossing state lines to secure firearms and attend a riot has no business being there and must be looking for an excuse to shoot people.’ ?

Boru

[onlinebiker]

Wtf?

You have never heard of a rhetorical statement?

If I meant it as a prediction - don'tcha think I would preface it so?

I started it off at the OP by saying " I would be surprised if he was convicted of the greater charges"

See me crowing about predicting it?

No?

Why?

( altogether now)

IT WAS A RHETORICAL STATEMENT!

---

He didn' t get the verdict he wanted to see.

Therefore the jury is either stupid, corrupt or hand picked by the evil other
......

Don' t you know nuthin'?

If it was meant as rhetorical, why did you try to defend it? 

Boru

I didn' t.


Sorry to disappoint your thirst for rioting.
....

I wouldn' t have mentioned it if I had known people would get snippy about it...

[Neo-Scholastic]

Andrew Coffee IV, a black man, was just aquitted because he acted in self-defense. But of course that does not fit the race hustle narrative.

[Fake Messiah]

Andrew Coffee IV, a black man, was just aquitted because he acted in self-defense. But of course that does not fit the race hustle narrative.

Andrew Coffee IV killed someone during the armed conflict on intruders in his home, while if Rittenhouse did not bring AR-15 with him there would be no dead people that day in that place.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Andrew Coffee IV, a black man, was just aquitted because he acted in self-defense. But of course that does not fit the race hustle narrative.

The cases would only be worth comparing if Coffee went to someone else’s house, picked up a gun, went to a third house under the guise of ‘protecting’ the occupants, then killed two people.

Boru

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

If it was meant as rhetorical, why did you try to defend it? 

Boru

I didn' t.


Sorry to disappoint your thirst for rioting.
....

I wouldn' t have mentioned it if I had known people would get snippy about it...

(Bold mine)





Boru

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

Andrew Coffee IV, a black man, was just aquitted because he acted in self-defense. But of course that does not fit the race hustle narrative.

Andrew Coffee IV killed someone during the armed conflict on intruders in his home, while if Rittenhouse did not bring AR-15 with him there would be no dead people that day in that place.

 Are you simply ignorant, or are you as racist as your recent posts suggest?

----and a putative Christian. My goodness, what  is the world coming to, when a Christian can be a nasty little racist? 

[The Architect Of Fate]

Andrew Coffee IV, a black man, was just aquitted because he acted in self-defense. But of course that does not fit the race hustle narrative.

Not even remotely the same. It's ridiculous you would even compare the two cases 

---

By the logic of this thread anyone crossing state lines to visit family for Thankgiving, have no business being there and must be racists.

Were you high when you wrote this?