[Shocking Reflection]: Finally, I found Mohammed's name in the Bible and the Torah

[Jehanne]

The context is clearly someone in the present and not some future individual.  In fact, no Jewish interpreter saw the passage as being prophetic.

But "The Song of Solomon" in the Hebrew OT clearly speaks about a present tense:

https://biblehub.com/texts/songs/5-16.htm

Rough translation from google translate:

Wait for the sweets and all the pets, this is my uncle and this is my bad, daughters of Jerusalem

original text:

חכו ממתקים וכלו מחמדים זה דודי וזה רעי בנות ירושלם׃


Translation of  מחמדים :

Muhamadim

The word "wait for" in the verse clearly turns this into a prophecy. Wait for "Mohammed" whom has a sweet words.

The sweet words are obviously the Quran that came with "Mohammedim"; Jenny.

My name is not Jenny.

No Jewish interpreter prior to Muhammad's birth (or, after) has interpreted this passage as referring to some future individual.

Waiting for the "sweets"? That's like me waiting for a pizza, one that I ordered. How is such "prophetic"??

[Angrboda]

You're arguing based upon a Google translation? And you don't see anything wrong with that? What kind of a moron are you? Jesus fucking Christ you are stupid.

[Jehanne]

Another problem is that ancient Hebrew is different than modern Hebrew.

[WinterHold]

But "The Song of Solomon" in the Hebrew OT clearly speaks about a present tense:

https://biblehub.com/texts/songs/5-16.htm

Rough translation from google translate:

Wait for the sweets and all the pets, this is my uncle and this is my bad, daughters of Jerusalem

original text:

חכו ממתקים וכלו מחמדים זה דודי וזה רעי בנות ירושלם׃


Translation of  מחמדים :

Muhamadim

The word "wait for" in the verse clearly turns this into a prophecy. Wait for "Mohammed" whom has a sweet words.

The sweet words are obviously the Quran that came with "Mohammedim"; Jenny.

My name is not Jenny.

No Jewish interpreter prior to Muhammad's birth (or, after) has interpreted this passage as referring to some future individual.

Waiting for the "sweets"?  That's like me waiting for a pizza, one that I ordered.  How is such "prophetic"??

I used the word "rough translation" as a synonym to "basic translation". Here's a screenshot for the google translate "rough/basic" translation:



Moreover though; here's an accurate spot-on translation here; read it if you may:

https://biblehub.com/text/songs/5-16.htm

The word from the table is the 4th word:

[Jehanne]

As I said, you need to verify the translation in the ancient Hebrew manuscripts and to specify which manuscript that you are using.

These types of studies are the domain of experts. Can you cite a single scholar who supports your conclusions?

[WinterHold]

As I said, you need to verify the translation in the ancient Hebrew manuscripts and to specify which manuscript that you are using.

These types of studies are the domain of experts.  Can you cite a single scholar who supports your conclusions?

The bold sentence tells me that you wanna fly from my theory.

There is no "domain of experts" in my vocabulary; I have every tiny bit of scientific and literal content at my disposal; it's the digital age where every capable human is supported by internet and tons above tons of content.

It's not 1029, London. Today we have enough scientific might at out disposal.

So again: My advanced, very scientific and accurate electronic translators tell me that the Hebrew sentence (verse) contains the word Mohammed; ironically through search I discovered too that the name was omitted in English versions of the so called "OT" by the commands of the Church and the racist Pope who commit massacres in the Middle East and commit mass theft of locals.

So what say you?

[arewethereyet]

[The Grand Nudger]

Magic book as crystal ball. So true, much science. IDK about the rest of yall, but I'm convinced. Fuck me, which way is east?

[Jehanne]

As I said, you need to verify the translation in the ancient Hebrew manuscripts and to specify which manuscript that you are using.

These types of studies are the domain of experts.  Can you cite a single scholar who supports your conclusions?

The bold sentence tells me that you wanna fly from my theory.

There is no "domain of experts" in my vocabulary; I have every tiny bit of scientific and literal content at my disposal; it's the digital age where every capable human is supported by internet and tons above tons of content.

It's not 1029, London. Today we have enough scientific might at out disposal.

So again: My advanced, very scientific and accurate electronic translators tell me that the Hebrew sentence (verse) contains the word Mohammed; ironically through search I discovered too that the name was omitted in English versions of the so called "OT" by the commands of the Church and the racist Pope who commit massacres in the Middle East and commit mass theft of locals.

So what say you?

The verse does not contain the name "Muhammad". (You're not even spelling it correctly!)

[R00tKiT]

There is no "domain of experts" in my vocabulary; I have every tiny bit of scientific and literal content at my disposal; 

This helps explain why you're probably the only muslim in the world who prays three times a day.

So again: My advanced, very scientific and accurate electronic translators

Google translate is not a very smart translator, at least try DeepL while you're at it, though I highly doubt it translates hebrew.

it's the digital age where every capable human is supported by internet and tons above tons of content.

Right, then start by getting the number of prayers right, before engaging in comparative religious studies.