Posts: 66940
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Is artificial selection considered "evolution"?
March 12, 2012 at 8:46 pm
(This post was last modified: March 12, 2012 at 8:49 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
It's a "sad holdover" from demonstrable differences in process and cause, as well as the effect and end product, but I'm sure your assessment of this is more accurate than my own. How people see these processes, or how they relate to them though, I'd agree with you on completely. Hell, some peoples ideas of what evolution or nature are a sad holdovers. Nature/evolution as block layer, decider, planner, designer, etc.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
