Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation:
143
RE: Prof. Alan Woodward is Wrong; The Internet is Fine
March 15, 2012 at 2:35 pm
Ah yes, rubber-hose cryptanalysis. I prefer the russian variant: "thermo-rectal cryptanalysis".
Posts: 4940
Threads: 99
Joined: April 17, 2011
Reputation:
45
RE: Prof. Alan Woodward is Wrong; The Internet is Fine
March 15, 2012 at 4:46 pm
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2012 at 4:47 pm by Doubting Thomas.)
(March 15, 2012 at 2:03 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Not really. The whole reason the ciphers used to protect the Internet are secure is because they are developed by the most mathematically minded people on the planet, and take literally years to perfect. Public key cryptography (RSA, etc) is practically impossible to break due to the mathematics behind it, and the only changes we need to make are to increase the size of the keys every few years as faster hardware is developed that is capable of brute-forcing old shorter keys.
But the trouble is that idiots will still continue to use passwords like "12345."
Quote:Whenever you hear of a "hack" on the Internet, 99 times out of 100 it is down to human error, not some magical algorithm that can break crypto. Usually there are security vulnerabilities in the application being attacked, like XSS or SQL Injection. A lot of times social engineering is used to get sysadmin to turn off firewalls, or to get people to give away their passwords.
Right, which is why I say that even some new "totally secure" internet won't be totally invulnerable from hacking.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.