Thank you for dedicating a full thread to insult me, that suggests that I wasn't wrong in all I said in that post.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 15, 2025, 3:17 pm
Thread Rating:
Jesus and the Number 14 cockup
|
Quote:. oh and the number fourteen is provably not sacred. Be interested to how you managed to prove the negative. 14 also=5 in numerology and has significance in several religions. 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 I agree about Michael.His posts are pretty stunning. His depth of erudition seems to be on a much higher plane than mine and all but a few people here. I say 'seems to be' because I am still digesting what is a lot of new material for me. RE: Jesus and the Number 14 cockup
April 11, 2012 at 7:27 am
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2012 at 7:31 am by michaelsherlock.)
(April 11, 2012 at 5:03 am)Rusko Wrote: Thank you for dedicating a full thread to insult me, that suggests that I wasn't wrong in all I said in that post. It was not entirely dedicated to you, but rather, I posted that to admit that I had made a silly error in assuming that you were a moderator. Sorry for any confusion. With regards to your accusations, I would suggest you follow those leads a little more precisely in the future. If you decide to investigate the grounds of your accusations against me in a little more detail, then please post your findings publically. I give you permission. (April 11, 2012 at 5:42 am)padraic Wrote:Quote:. oh and the number fourteen is provably not sacred. Thank you. And you are correct regarding the number 5. For an indepth study of this subject you might want to look into Manly P. Hall's works regarding the septenary (7 Planets/5 planets and 2 Luminaries i.e Sun and Moon). Very interesting stuff.
You can always trust a person in search of the truth, but never the one who has found it. MANLY P. HALL
http://michaelsherlockauthor.blogspot.jp/ (April 11, 2012 at 1:18 am)michaelsherlock Wrote:(April 11, 2012 at 1:13 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Never!!! I clicked on the link, checked other results, googled you so... yes, yes I did. :-) You feel that? That thing in the pit of your stomach? Its called humiliation. You should probably get used to it on a regular basis if you're going to mistake wolves for lambs. (April 11, 2012 at 12:37 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: I clicked on the link, checked other results, googled you so... yes, yes I did. :-) I feel no humiliation at present, nor should I. I have done nothing to be humiliated for. Please share your findings.
You can always trust a person in search of the truth, but never the one who has found it. MANLY P. HALL
http://michaelsherlockauthor.blogspot.jp/
I think what will make everyone sit forward and pay attention to your intellect sherlock - is an original piece. I like your enthusiastic intelligent posts, but I don't want to see AtheistForums.org used as your 'sloppy seconds mistress.'
Show us what you got man ... give us something original that we can sink are collective conversational teeth into. I have no reason to think that these are not your words, I just want us to be the site of some original thoughts from you. ![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)