Interesting take on black holes.

[fuckass365]

I'm no physicist, but this shit makes sense to me.

[Anomalocaris]

If you are no physicist, then where did you get the sense this theory allegedly makes for you?

[fuckass365]

If you are no physicist, then where did you get the sense this theory allegedly makes for you?

I just feel that the idea is plausible. Why wouldn't it be? Helps answer Expansion and gives theoretical insight into the nature of black holes.

---

This is only in the context of his hypothesis, I think. I'm not saying this is final or correct by any means, but it has many "Yo Dawg!" meme applications.

[Anomalocaris]

It's hard to gain insight from any conjecture - let's be honest, this is not a theory but a arm waving conjecture of the windmill caliber - unless it affords means to test itself against competing conjectures and theories. Otherwise it is just one piece of shit indistinguishable from any other part of the content of a infinitely large cesspool.

[Autumnlicious]

What? What? Antimatter decays into dark matter? This is news to me!

Antimatter can't decay into dark matter. Dark matter is a form of matter. Antimatter can't turn into matter, not even the dark kind. If they interacted at all, they would annihilate.

I know that Allie. Or at least know that we currently do not even know if that happens.

I do have a more fun paper that isn't as nearly grand as the OP has -- http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.2399

It at least has more than one guy working on it. And they never exceeded the bounds of their question, which is to explain baryogenesis -- they did implicate dark matter was weakly interacting anti-baryons though.

It was fun to read.

[Welsh cake]

We don't know enough about singularities to make any such claim about them or speculate the possibilities while expecting any of it to make sense.