Muhammad the Greatest: A Comparative Study

[Darkstar]

Response: If you are claiming that he did not do these things and continue not to prove it with evidence, then it's fair to conclude that even you don't believe your own claim, thus supporting the fact that Muhammad did do what I claimed.

If. But I'm NOT making any positive claims. I am rejecting yours. And becuase you have not proven you claim (which you admit to making in the above quote) then can I conclude you don't even believe what you are saying? (I smell trolling poe...for more reasons than just this)

[Minimalist]

.....50 pages long....

Nah, I've had it with this asshole. Loosen your turban, abdul...it's cutting off the blood flow to your brain.

[Jackalope]

Let me repeat: You are not claiming that he did? I am now officially not claiming that he did not do these things. I am rejecting the claims that he did do them. You still have not proven that he did do them. If you do not supply anything, then I will conclude (not claim) that he didn't do them.

Response: If you are claiming that he did not do these things and continue not to prove it with evidence, then it's fair to conclude that even you don't believe your own claim, thus supporting the fact that Muhammad did do what I claimed.

Thereby proving that you have not the first clue about what a positive claim is, nor where the burden of proof lies.

Logic fail.

[Cinjin]

[Al-Fatihah]

If. But I'm NOT making any positive claims. I am rejecting yours. And becuase you have not proven you claim (which you admit to making in the above quote) then can I conclude you don't even believe what you are saying? (I smell trolling poe...for more reasons than just this)

Response: Once again, you are rejecting my claim by stating your claim is a fact that Muhammad did not conquer Arabia and inspire followers with the Qur'an. Yet when asked for evidence of your claim, you still duck and dodge. Thus it must only mean it's because you don't even believe your own claim. Thus there is no need for me to present evidence since we are in agreement.

---

Thereby proving that you have not the first clue about what a positive claim is, nor where the burden of proof lies.

Logic fail.

Response: Yet your weak rebuttal supports evidence to the contrary. Debunked as usual.

[Darkstar]

If. But I'm NOT making any positive claims. I am rejecting yours. And becuase you have not proven you claim (which you admit to making in the above quote) then can I conclude you don't even believe what you are saying? (I smell trolling poe...for more reasons than just this)

Response: Once again, you are rejecting my claim by stating your claim is a fact that Muhammad did not conquer Arabia and inspire followers with the Qur'an. Yet when asked for evidence of your claim, you still duck and dodge. Thus it must only mean it's because you don't even believe your own claim. Thus there is no need for me to present evidence since we are in agreement.

Cthulhu Dreaming: Exhibit A.
My rejection is not a claim unto itself; it is me asking you to provide evidence for your claim, and refusing to believe said claim until it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt. The fact that you refuse to do so indicates that you have none.

[Al-Fatihah]

Cthulhu Dreaming: Exhibit A.
My rejection is not a claim unto itself; it is me asking you to provide evidence for your claim, and refusing to believe said claim until it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt. The fact that you refuse to do so indicates that you have none.

Response: Then if it's not a claim, then it's an illogical rejection. So it doesn't deserve a logical rebuttal.

[Cinjin]

If. But I'm NOT making any positive claims. I am rejecting yours. And becuase you have not proven you claim (which you admit to making in the above quote) then can I conclude you don't even believe what you are saying? (I smell trolling poe...for more reasons than just this)

Response: Once again, you are rejecting my claim by stating your claim is a fact that Muhammad did not conquer Arabia and inspire followers with the Qur'an. Yet when asked for evidence of your claim, you still duck and dodge. Thus it must only mean it's because you don't even believe your own claim. Thus there is no need for me to present evidence since we are in agreement.

---

Thereby proving that you have not the first clue about what a positive claim is, nor where the burden of proof lies.

Logic fail.

Response: Yet your weak rebuttal supports evidence to the contrary. Debunked as usual.

"I'm rubber. You're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and ..."


Ass hat.

[Dee Dee Ramone]

.....50 pages long....

Nah, I've had it with this asshole. Loosen your turban, abdul...it's cutting off the blood flow to your brain.

An image, how offending!!!

[Something completely different]

what`s going on here?