Muhammad the Greatest: A Comparative Study

[Kayenneh]

Response: Once again, try reading the conversation. I don't have to change my argument. If someone requests my argument, I present it. I'm not obligated to change my argument to something else because of you. I don't force you to change yours. So don't make the erroneous suggestion to tell someone to change their argument. If someone keeps asking you what is two plus two, it's not many new ways to give an answer other than 4.

Understand this, I'm not asking you to change your opinion, i am asking you to at least rephrase your statements or add something to what you've previously said, since spamming is against the forum rules. As a moderator it is well within my duty to tell you to conduct yourself accordingly.
And what conversation? Oh, you must refer to the trollish monologue of yours, despite people trying to interact with you. And it's wonderful that you've got a grasp of basic maths. If you could grasp reality as well, it would be much appreciated.

[Darkstar]

Response: Proof of physical change requires observation. Therefore, if scientists claim to observe a species evolve, then we she be able to see video footage of it. The fact is....there is none. Thus proving that it was never observed and evolution is false. Debunked as usual.

Scientists have observed evolution. Next.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/06/11...d-in-a-lab

[Cyberman]

And what conversation? Oh, you must refer to the trollish monologue of yours, despite people trying to interact with you.

In terms of conversational interaction, Ali's several thousand generations less evolved than an answering machine; and far less entertaining.

[Something completely different]

Response: Proof of physical change requires observation. Therefore, if scientists claim to observe a species evolve, then we she be able to see video footage of it. The fact is....there is none. Thus proving that it was never observed and evolution is false. Debunked as usual.

DO YOU SPEAK ENGLISH???


Video footage is not the ultimate statement of proof.
What kind of a weird logic is that? Ever seen Avatar? Ever been to that planet?
And by the way - video is haram.

Scientific knowlege is aquired by a method called rational critizism!!
Which requires studies which contain conclusions out of observations.
It`s the conclusions which matter not the observations.


Now show me the video footage of yourself to prove that you are real.

And dont even dare to repost or:

[Al-Fatihah]

Response: Once again, try reading the conversation. I don't have to change my argument. If someone requests my argument, I present it. I'm not obligated to change my argument to something else because of you. I don't force you to change yours. So don't make the erroneous suggestion to tell someone to change their argument.

Dont fuck with the mods!



........... that`s HARAM!!!

Response: I don't mess with anyone. I'm simply stating the obvious. It's completetly irrational to tell a person to say something new in a debate when every debater has there own style of debate. It's also irrational to tell someone to say something new ...when the same questions are being answered.

It's a very simple question, I ask a mod 10 times what's 2+2 and would like them to answer truthfully without repeating the answer. You can't. It's an irrational concept.

[Kayenneh]

German, you have to post this baby in the Meme thread!

[Darkstar]

Response: I don't mess with anyone. I'm simply stating the obvious. It's completetly irrational to tell a person to say something new in a debate when every debater has there own style of debate. It's also irrational to tell someone to say something new ...when the same questions are being answered.

It's a very simple question, I ask a mod 10 times what's 2+2 and would like them to answer truthfully without repeating the answer. You can't. It's an irrational concept.

Failed analogy. You keep saying it's five, and you won't tell us how you got that answer (metaphorically, of course). Also, your style? Trolling and spamming is your style? Well...I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

[Al-Fatihah]

rational critizism[/b]!!
Which requires studies which contain conclusions out of observations.
It`s the conclusions which matter not the observations.


Now show me the video footage of yourself to prove that you are real.

And dont even dare to repost or:

Response: More absurdity. You couldn't disprove the fact that the best evidence of physical change is through observation. So in the case of evolution, the best evidence that something evolved is VIDEO. Your argument fails. Debunked as usual.

[Something completely different]

Ahh fuck it!

I am of to have coffee and blue Goulaises.

[Darkstar]

Response: More absurdity. You couldn't disprove the fact that the best evidence of physical change is through observation.

Did you miss my post, or did you just ignore it?