Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 1:55 pm
(This post was last modified: February 27, 2013 at 1:57 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(February 27, 2013 at 4:55 am)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: Let's say there was a magic "cure" that could prevent all future born humans from developing into homosexuals, should it be used?
No.
(February 27, 2013 at 5:11 am)Aractus Wrote: Well they should be prevented from marrying, and prevented from adopting children, so I suppose prevented from existence makes perfect sense.
Castrating all christians makes more sense. So let's see you volunteer.
Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 2:06 pm
(February 27, 2013 at 4:55 am)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: Let's say there was a magic "cure" that could prevent all future born humans from developing into homosexuals, should it be used?
This raises the more fundamental question of how different human characteristics should be viewed. How do you decide when a naturalistic characteristic is good in itself or whether it should be prevented?
No.
Leaves more totty for us real men.
(that was a blackadder quote by the way)
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 29846
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 2:43 pm
(This post was last modified: February 27, 2013 at 2:43 pm by Angrboda.)
It occurs to me that there is some critical ambiguity in the original question, having to do with how that cure is effected, and the consequences of that method. I have three concerns here. First, anything which would tend to reduce genetic variability would seem in and of itself bad (the adaptive value of a trait is always with respect to specific environments and only with respect to those environments; thus, any reduction in genetic variability poses risks to the long term viability of the species [the question of heritability of the trait, kinship selection effects, and so on tend to play havoc with my simplistic analysis here]). Second, if the epigenetic theory of homosexuality is correct, the evolutionary benefits of homosexuality exist and are realized, largely, in those who aren't themselves possessed of the trait; leaving open questions as to what we're actually trying to control here, in whom, and what the effects of any specific intervention would be. Third, by most accounts, homosexuality is a product of phylogeny, not simply genetic, but also a result of other factors in addition to genetics and prior probability. So it would seem that any supposed cure to prevent the development of the phylogeny of homosexuality would also preclude the development of other traits when prior probability would not have resulted in that particular trait, stemming from the same starting conditions. (In perhaps clearer language, likely not all those with the predisposition to develop a homosexual orientation will actually go on to develop that orientation, and any early intervention would also be "curing" other conditions and developmental pathways that ultimately wouldn't have led to a homosexual orientation.)
A fourth consideration is the question of a sexual orientation spectrum, and more simplistically, bisexuality. When is too much attraction to the same sex enough to qualify for said therapy? Should we cure bisexuals as well? Anyone who isn't as straight as an arrow? I'm starting to wonder what the goal is here. Is fucking and making babies really all there is to life? God, I hope not; as someone who is celibate (and bisexual), that would make me even more depressed than I currently am.
Posts: 102
Threads: 1
Joined: November 23, 2012
Reputation:
3
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 2:50 pm
(February 27, 2013 at 2:43 pm)apophenia Wrote: Is fucking and making babies really all there is to life?
Kinda offtopic, but wanted to chime in that the two don't necessarily have to go together.
And just my two cents - procreation is definitely not the ultimate goal of all human life. Like hell it is.
But the eternal dilemma - how can we be happy amid the unhappiness of others?
Posts: 319
Threads: 3
Joined: January 30, 2013
Reputation:
8
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 2:51 pm
(February 27, 2013 at 2:50 pm)Vera Wrote: (February 27, 2013 at 2:43 pm)apophenia Wrote: Is fucking and making babies really all there is to life?
Kinda offtopic, but wanted to chime in that the two don't necessarily have to go together.
And just my two cents - procreation is definitely not the ultimate goal of all human life. Like hell it is.
One could argue that it is the general goal of all life, though. The purpose of life is to prolong itself.
If you believe it, question it. If you question it, get an answer. If you have an answer, does that answer satisfy reality? Does it satisfy you? Probably not. For no one else will agree with you, not really.
Posts: 102
Threads: 1
Joined: November 23, 2012
Reputation:
3
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 3:03 pm
(February 27, 2013 at 2:51 pm)Question Mark Wrote: One could argue that it is the general goal of all life, though. The purpose of life is to prolong itself.
The most basic one - surely. And then you have an animal whose mind becomes slightly different from the rest of life on this planet, and all sorts of further considerations come into play, new goals, new ways of defining good (not only on a personal, but on a societal level), new meanings...
But the eternal dilemma - how can we be happy amid the unhappiness of others?
Posts: 29846
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 3:08 pm
(This post was last modified: February 27, 2013 at 3:08 pm by Angrboda.)
(February 27, 2013 at 2:50 pm)Vera Wrote: (February 27, 2013 at 2:43 pm)apophenia Wrote: Is fucking and making babies really all there is to life?
Kinda offtopic, but wanted to chime in that the two don't necessarily have to go together.
And just my two cents - procreation is definitely not the ultimate goal of all human life. Like hell it is.
Indeed, but in the context of the thread, the possibility of making babies is the critical fact separating the affected class from the non-affected class. (Or so it would seem to me.)
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 3:09 pm
(February 27, 2013 at 1:35 pm)Vera Wrote: (February 27, 2013 at 12:42 pm)orogenicman Wrote: What makes you think that "expanding one's dating pool" is a goal homosexuals are interested in?
Of course they are. We all know how promiscuous all gays are. Also, they don't care if someone's gay or not - they just go for it. Which is why real men are so uncomfortable in their presence.
Erm, gays are no more promiscuous than any other group (except for nuns, of course).
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
Posts: 102
Threads: 1
Joined: November 23, 2012
Reputation:
3
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 3:13 pm
(This post was last modified: February 27, 2013 at 3:15 pm by Vera.)
(February 27, 2013 at 3:08 pm)apophenia Wrote: Indeed, but in the context of the thread, the possibility of making babies is the critical fact separating the affected class from the non-affected class. (Or so it would seem to me.)
Oh, I get it (we had a very similar argument - only, it was proposed in all seriousness - over at TTA today; something along the lines that homosexuality is bad for society because sex is only right if it could possibly lead to procreation or some such shit).
Frankly, if people want to live just so that they can procreate and preserve their precious genes - be my guest. Just so long as they don't shove their ideas about what ( my) life is all about down my throat. Or down anyone else's throat for that matter
@orogenicman: You don't say I was just repeating some of the crap bigots like to use as argument. Trying to be sarcastic, you know (and failing).
But the eternal dilemma - how can we be happy amid the unhappiness of others?
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 8:01 pm
(February 27, 2013 at 3:13 pm)Vera Wrote: (February 27, 2013 at 3:08 pm)apophenia Wrote: Indeed, but in the context of the thread, the possibility of making babies is the critical fact separating the affected class from the non-affected class. (Or so it would seem to me.)
Oh, I get it (we had a very similar argument - only, it was proposed in all seriousness - over at TTA today; something along the lines that homosexuality is bad for society because sex is only right if it could possibly lead to procreation or some such shit).
Frankly, if people want to live just so that they can procreate and preserve their precious genes - be my guest. Just so long as they don't shove their ideas about what (my) life is all about down my throat. Or down anyone else's throat for that matter
@orogenicman: You don't say I was just repeating some of the crap bigots like to use as argument. Trying to be sarcastic, you know (and failing).
That's okay. Sometimes sarcasm is hard to discern in simple text format.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
|