BUTT SEX!!!!

[Something completely different]

Never even hinted that this is how I feel.

I am not sure if you are lying, or simply want me to dig up the post by the bannes "Al-Fathisomething" in which he argued that marrying a 9 year old and haviing sex with a 9 year old is ok - which you gave kudos, and the entire thread in which you kept "arguing" that sex with minors is ok "because it is sometimes consensual" - so you can amuse yourself over the time I wasted in digging these things up by giving your predictebale and very mature "do you even lift" "counterargument".

He didn't compare homosexuality to anything. I've said this at least four times in this thread. I'm saying it because it's the truth, by the way. You can go to the fist page and see that he did not even mention homosexuality.

I have read the first page before replying to you. He stated that everyone should have interest in the sexlifes of people who commit criminal offences - he gave this as a reply to why the religious are so interested in peoples sexlifes during a debate on religious biggotry towards homosexuals - hence (maybe not even willingly) framing homosexuality as something one should have interest in because it is a offence.

I've also asked if you and missluckie could stop misrepresenting what people have actually said a couple times now. Again, stop.

When I am found to have done that, I actualy appologise.

So can you show where I did that?

Since when are you this forums moral guide?

[Gilgamesh]

I am not sure if you are lying, or simply want me to dig up the post by the bannes "Al-Fathisomething" in which he argued that marrying a 9 year old and haviing sex with a 9 year old is ok - which you gave kudos, and the entire thread in which you kept "arguing" that sex with minors is ok "because it is sometimes consensual" - so you can amuse yourself over the time I wasted in digging these things up by giving your predictebale and very mature "do you even lift" "counterargument".

The kudos is irrelevant, by the way, unless you wrongly consider kudos meaning the giver may as well have made the same post himself.

I did argue that sex with minors is okay in some circumstances. I think it is. You're implying that means I also support child-rape. Stop strawmanning, please. How many times am I going to have to ask? Why, just why?

He stated that everyone should have interest in the sexlifes of people who commit criminal offences

You're still lying. He did not say that. Please stop. It's on the first page and I've quoted it exactly twice. Just please stop. How many times am I going to have to ask you to stop being dishonest?

he gave this as a reply to why the religious are so interested in peoples sexlifes during a debate on religious biggotry towards homosexuals - hence (maybe not even willingly) framing homosexuality as something one should have interest in because it is a offence.

There was no debate. Even if there was, any connection you make from his postings in this thread to child-rape being the same as homosexuality is completely on you. You're blaming him for jumping the gun and putting words in his mouth.

[Something completely different]

This is pointless.

You continue to repeat the same phrase of yours, yet you are unwilling to actualy show, how what he posted did not dump homosexuality and child rape into the same bucket.
Neither did he manage to show it, he actualy ran away when confronted, to never post here again.

And by the way, I can remember making my possition clear, that the age of consent shouldnt be lowered because some minors have conseual sex because this creates a legal relaim for abusers to interact in.
Your reply was a "Do you even lift Faggot?"
And I am interpreting this as a No. So if you want your positions to not be misunderstood, then articulate yourself in a way which makes your possition clear. Constantly repeating "Do you even lift", "Faggot", "Strong emotion" isnt exactly making your possition clear during an argument.

And why do you keep playing this game where you defend the actions of people who have either broken the forum rules or post outragous nonsence?
Like you defended BuckLee and Al-something?

[Gilgamesh]

And why do you keep playing this game where you defend the actions of people who have either broken the forum rules or post outragous nonsence?
Like you defended BuckLee and Al-something?

The rest of your post was conjecture, character judgement (of mine, of course) and more dishonesty (as if the onus is on me to prove a baseless assertion untrue) so I'll reply to this only.

I don't defend these people. Sometimes I do, but most the time I'm just destroying fallacious arguments that are put forward from the larger side. A single person posting nonsense does not bother me, but a group with mob-rule mentality putting forward nonsense to a single person does. Some people get out of hand when they want to stand together for a single message. It's kinda ridiculous from the outside looking in.

[Something completely different]

The rest of your post was conjecture, character judgement (of mine, of course) and more dishonesty (as if the onus is on me to prove a baseless assertion untrue) so I'll reply to this only.

Not a single bit. It is a list of reasone for why I see you as a troll who is here to annoy people.

I don't defend these people. Sometimes I do, but most the time I'm just destroying fallacious arguments that are put forward from the larger side. A single person posting nonsense does not bother me, but a group with mob-rule mentality putting forward nonsense to a single person does. Some people get out of hand when they want to stand together for a single message. It's kinda ridiculous from the outside looking in.

If a person comes here, posts something wrong or outragous and several people reply to him - that is not mob mentality. Every single individual gives his own individual reply - the individual simply happens to agree with several other individuals. Your point is invalid - there is nor organised conspiracy by several members of this forum to deliberatly bully a certain member or a certain kind of member.

Are you simply pretending as if there was so you can claim for yourself to be:

from the outside looking in.

?

[Gilgamesh]

No. I'll outright say that. You're all really, really fucking dumb and I'm a god, relative to you dumb people. #YOLO #SWAG



u mad? u miring? do you even lift? Jimmies rustled? lol get ruzed, bro.

[Belac Enrobso]

I've slaughtered several chickens just to revive this post.

P.S.
...BUTT SEX IS FUCKING AMAZING...