Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 24, 2024, 11:45 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
California Female Inmates Sterilized
#1
California Female Inmates Sterilized
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/07/08/...n-welfare/

Any of our longer running members remember discussing sterilization (permanent or temporary) a long time ago?
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#2
RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
The doctor who performed some of them:

Quote:“Over a 10-year period, that isn’t a huge amount of money,” Heinrich said, “compared to what you save in welfare paying for these unwanted children – as they procreated more. They all wanted it done,” he said of the sterilizations. “If they come a year or two later saying, ‘Somebody forced me to have this done,’ that’s a lie. That’s somebody looking for the state to give them a handout.”

Bolding mine. We should see the result of an investigation before we start crucifying doctors. If they were performing a procedure which was actually wanted by the patient, then there isn't anything wrong with it.

Note that I'm not saying they wanted it; I'm merely exercising skepticism until we have more evidence. Innocent until proven guilty, and all that.
Reply
#3
RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
Here, have a more reliable source:
http://www.sacbee.com/2013/07/07/5549696...ornia.html

The crux of the issue is, is it forced sterilization or not?

Advocates claim that it is coercive, proponents claim that requesting permission is not coercion.

Regardless, there is a procedural violation as it should be a case-by-case review. Whether or not that is sensible is another matter.
Against:
Quote:Crystal Nguyen, a former Valley State Prison inmate who worked in the prison's infirmary during 2007, said she often overheard medical staff asking inmates who had served multiple prison terms to agree to be sterilized.

"I was like, 'Oh my God, that's not right,' " said Nguyen, 28. "Do they think they're animals, and they don't want them to breed anymore?"

One former Valley State inmate who gave birth to a son in October 2006 said the institution's OB-GYN, Dr. James Heinrich, repeatedly pressured her to agree to a tubal ligation.

"As soon as he found out that I had five kids, he suggested that I look into getting it done. The closer I got to my due date, the more he talked about it," said Christina Cordero, 34, who spent two years in prison for auto theft. "He made me feel like a bad mother if I didn't do it."

Cordero, released in 2008 and now living in Upland, agreed to the procedure.

"Today," she said, "I wish I would have never had it done."

For:
Quote:In an interview with CIR, Heinrich said he provided an important service to poor women who faced health risks in future pregnancies because of past Caesarean sections. The 69-year-old Bay Area physician denied pressuring anyone and expressed surprise that local contract doctors had charged for the surgeries. He described the $147,460 total as minimal.

"Over a 10-year period, that isn't a huge amount of money," Heinrich said, "compared to what you save in welfare paying for these unwanted children – as they procreated more."

The top medical manager at Valley State Prison from 2005 to 2008 characterized the surgeries as an empowerment issue for female inmates, providing them the same options as women on the outside. Daun Martin, a licensed psychologist, also claimed that some pregnant women, particularly those on drugs or who were homeless, would commit crimes so they could return to prison for better health care.

"Do I criticize those women for manipulating the system because they're pregnant? Absolutely not," said Martin, 73. "But I don't think it should happen. And I'd like to find ways to decrease that."

Procedural violations aside, how does one qualify the difference between coercive and non-coercive recommendations?

In the strictest sense, the against side did agree to such operations. There remains the question of informed consent though.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
Reply
#4
RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
(July 8, 2013 at 5:01 pm)Tiberius Wrote: The doctor who performed some of them:

Quote:“Over a 10-year period, that isn’t a huge amount of money,” Heinrich said, “compared to what you save in welfare paying for these unwanted children – as they procreated more. They all wanted it done,” he said of the sterilizations. “If they come a year or two later saying, ‘Somebody forced me to have this done,’ that’s a lie. That’s somebody looking for the state to give them a handout.”

Bolding mine. We should see the result of an investigation before we start crucifying doctors. If they were performing a procedure which was actually wanted by the patient, then there isn't anything wrong with it.

Note that I'm not saying they wanted it; I'm merely exercising skepticism until we have more evidence. Innocent until proven guilty, and all that.

I question the ethics as well as the legality of performing such an operation on people who are confined against their will, regardless of whether or not they want it. And mind you, all we have here is the doctor's word that they actually wanted it.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#5
RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
(July 9, 2013 at 3:10 am)orogenicman Wrote: I question the ethics as well as the legality of performing such an operation on people who are confined against their will, regardless of whether or not they want it. And mind you, all we have here is the doctor's word that they actually wanted it.

if they wanted it, why would it be unethical to perform it? (provided informed consent and so on.)

The way that the doctor presents the option is, to me, the key to whether or not it's ethical. It seems to me that the doctor should have a list of criteria (completely health-based) on who he would recommend tubal ligation to. And he has to make it clear that it is completely up to the patient, and that it would in no way affect the patient's care and privileges at the facility. Also since i think it's a bit inevitable that patients may feel like they have to say yes, or they may not get good treatment if they disagree with the doctor, the doctor should try his best to prevent them feeling this way.

This is how researchers recruit patients into clinical trials, to prevent anyone from feeling like they have to do something they don't want to.

And then of course, the doctor should explain what the procedure does, why he recommends it, what her other options are, side-effects, etc. etc.

I mean doctors usually just recommend things, but in a prison, where the patients are likely to feel like they shouldn't fall out of favour with the doctor, doctors should be extra careful not to cause their patients to feel pressured into a decision.
Reply
#6
RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
The sterilizations performed were not forced, as far as we know. The article did a good job of wording it to make it seem as though they were, though.

I see no problem.
Reply
#7
RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
(July 9, 2013 at 4:04 am)Gilgamesh Wrote: The sterilizations performed were not forced, as far as we know. The article did a good job of wording it to make it seem as though they were, though.

I see no problem.
Irrespective of whether the women were forced or not, due process was not followed so the Health Care Review Committee wasn't able to confirm consent or monitor the process. What this means is that a doctor was making arbitrary decisions on the suitability of particular women to have children and side-stepping all quality controls. That's malpractice.
Sum ergo sum
Reply
#8
RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
(July 9, 2013 at 3:32 am)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote:
(July 9, 2013 at 3:10 am)orogenicman Wrote: I question the ethics as well as the legality of performing such an operation on people who are confined against their will, regardless of whether or not they want it. And mind you, all we have here is the doctor's word that they actually wanted it.

if they wanted it, why would it be unethical to perform it? (provided informed consent and so on.)

The way that the doctor presents the option is, to me, the key to whether or not it's ethical. It seems to me that the doctor should have a list of criteria (completely health-based) on who he would recommend tubal ligation to. And he has to make it clear that it is completely up to the patient, and that it would in no way affect the patient's care and privileges at the facility. Also since i think it's a bit inevitable that patients may feel like they have to say yes, or they may not get good treatment if they disagree with the doctor, the doctor should try his best to prevent them feeling this way.

This is how researchers recruit patients into clinical trials, to prevent anyone from feeling like they have to do something they don't want to.

And then of course, the doctor should explain what the procedure does, why he recommends it, what her other options are, side-effects, etc. etc.

I mean doctors usually just recommend things, but in a prison, where the patients are likely to feel like they shouldn't fall out of favour with the doctor, doctors should be extra careful not to cause their patients to feel pressured into a decision.

But we are not talking about patients in a clinical trial. We are talking about inmates in a prison. And having a cousin who used to be a psychiatrist at a maximum security prison who committed suicide, one has to wonder about the quality and perhaps even the ethics of healthcare providers at these institutions. I just think it sets a very dangerous precedent.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#9
RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
Being as our systems are set to "punish you off the streets" instead of "rehabilitate," I'm inclined to agree, Oro.
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#10
RE: California Female Inmates Sterilized
(July 9, 2013 at 5:28 am)Ben Davis Wrote: Irrespective of whether the women were forced or not, due process was not followed so the Health Care Review Committee wasn't able to confirm consent or monitor the process. What this means is that a doctor was making arbitrary decisions on the suitability of particular women to have children and side-stepping all quality controls. That's malpractice.

I think that this is the issue. There are procedures in place that must be followed before you perform that kind of operation on an inmate, and those were not followed. Which means that there's no paper trail, not even something as obvious as release/consent forms. There's no reason to accept that a charge this serious can be met with "nah, don't worry about it, she said it was okay."
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is the country ready for a female president? Silver 39 2566 July 23, 2024 at 3:14 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Interesting Turn of Events in California Minimalist 25 4006 May 12, 2018 at 3:51 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Warren 2020 (First female US President) GrandizerII 23 5751 November 10, 2016 at 10:00 pm
Last Post: Sterben
  Star wars: The portrayal of minority and female characters Lemonvariable72 42 7989 January 22, 2016 at 3:06 pm
Last Post: Lemonvariable72
  University of California microaggrssions list Lemonvariable72 18 6558 September 2, 2015 at 11:42 pm
Last Post: Catholic_Lady
  Qatar tells female tourists what not to... progamz 52 12047 June 10, 2014 at 8:07 pm
Last Post: Zidneya
  Manning states, "I am female" Silver 13 5402 September 3, 2013 at 12:57 am
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet
  The most popular book among Guantanamo inmates is... wwjs 3 1188 July 31, 2013 at 6:21 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  California keeps death penalty. Something completely different 5 1972 November 10, 2012 at 10:07 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  California's gay marriage ban unconstitutional Doubting Thomas 24 8826 February 15, 2012 at 4:30 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)