Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution

[LastPoet]

Hey! I called troll first!

[SavedByGraceThruFaith]

Isn't acknowledging mutations, even as an error, tacit acknowledgement of evolution anyway? It's not the mechanism being contested then, only whether it's an intended consequence.

I'm trying to follow Grace's logic here...but my eyes won't uncross.

Mutations eventually destroy the DNA code of all species given enough time.

So mutations disprove the theory of evolution.

[Jackalope]

Untrue.

Science is based in empiricism, which deals with the observable. That you have invented a god that is placed outside of the realm of empirical observation is not science's fault.

If Zazzy wants to post real stuff then Zazzy should post.

He has. That you fail to respond to it reasonably is your cross to bear.

See what I did there?

[SavedByGraceThruFaith]

If Zazzy wants to post real stuff then Zazzy should post.

He has. That you fail to respond to it reasonably is your cross to bear.

See what I did there?

I have not seen any post from Zazzy that had any real content.

[Jackalope]

Isn't acknowledging mutations, even as an error, tacit acknowledgement of evolution anyway? It's not the mechanism being contested then, only whether it's an intended consequence.

I'm trying to follow Grace's logic here...but my eyes won't uncross.

Mutations eventually destroy the DNA code of all species given enough time.

So mutations disprove the theory of evolution.

You have data that supports this assertion?

If only you applied the same standards of evidence to your own claims as those of others.

[Jackalope]

He has. That you fail to respond to it reasonably is your cross to bear.

See what I did there?

I have not seen any post from Zazzy that had any real content.

Get your vision checked.

Oh, by the way - pot, meet kettle.

[pocaracas]

Deleterious mutations get removed from the genome after 1~80 generations (20, on average).
Non-deleterious mutations may remain for thousands of generations.
Beneficial mutations remain for as long as they are beneficial.

Back to school with you, man. I told you to read... why didn't you?

[Esquilax]

Mutations eventually destroy the DNA code of all species given enough time.

So mutations disprove the theory of evolution.

So, after being given a source that shows that this is not the case, you continue along this idiotic path anyway, and have brought this on yourself:

You're a liar, Grace. You're a liar, and nobody here should take you seriously at all until you start actually engaging, and retract this blatantly false claim, with an acknowledgement that you are wrong.

[SavedByGraceThruFaith]

Mutations eventually destroy the DNA code of all species given enough time.

So mutations disprove the theory of evolution.

So, after being given a source that shows that this is not the case, you continue along this idiotic path anyway, and have brought this on yourself:

You're a liar, Grace. You're a liar, and nobody here should take you seriously at all until you start actually engaging, and retract this blatantly false claim, with an acknowledgement that you are wrong.

Your source was worthless. Just the same old blindness.

[Captain Colostomy]

Isn't acknowledging mutations, even as an error, tacit acknowledgement of evolution anyway? It's not the mechanism being contested then, only whether it's an intended consequence.

I'm trying to follow Grace's logic here...but my eyes won't uncross.

Mutations eventually destroy the DNA code of all species given enough time.

So mutations disprove the theory of evolution.

Do you comprehend how ridiculous you sound? Again, your religion is faith based, not fact based. Make your peace with that and you'll find you no longer are doing your god the disservice you are now. Trust me, with followers like you, his PR is in the shitter.