The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

[Anomalocaris]

Do you have a single tree with the stamp of "god"?

[Tiberius]

Do you have a single tree with the stamp of "god"?

Silly Chuck. It was created, so it must have a creator, and that creator is God.

[Cyberman]

Is it worth pointing out to our friend that tree rings from one tree are matched and overlapped with those from other, older, ones and so forming an unbroken chain of tree ring history many thousands of years further back in time than YECs claim the Universe has existed?

Actually, probably not so I won't bother.

[Jackalope]

I don't believe anyone claimed that it did.


20x, as pointed out to you, was on the order of 500 million years ago, many orders of magnitude longer ago than the date ranges in question. It's irrelevant to the question.

Do you have any idea why there was so much more CO2 500 million years ago than now, and so little free oxygen. Hmm, I wonder what that might be. (hint: plants)




Please, pull the other one.


Wrong.


It's abundantly clear to everyone here that you're pulling this stuff out of your ass.

Do you have a single tree with 11000 rings?

No - and if you had the slightest clue how and why dendrochronology works, you'd know why your question is absurd.

[Anomalocaris]

...... you'd know ....

Uhem. We are talking about the biblical literalist kind of moron.

---

Do you have a single tree with the stamp of "god"?

Silly Chuck. It was created, so it must have a creator, and that creator is God.

And I thought its creator was shiva's fart.

[Jackalope]

...... you'd know ....

Uhem. We are talking about the biblical literalist kind of moron.
.

You insult them your way, I'll insult them my way.

[Ryantology]

Basic definitions and facts have been given to no avail. Do you really think this mouth-breather will draw the correct conclusion from an analogy?

No, not really.

I applaud you and anyone else who wishes to continue reasoning with Grace, but you'd be better off jerking off your pets: at least you'd have a little something to show for the effort, and the animal might demonstrate some basic fucking gratitude.

As tempting as that sounds, what I'm really trying to do is provoke a response of any kind. This guy just flat out ignores everything I've said.

[Doubting Thomas]

Light transitions from red to violet as its wavelength shortens. Show me the precise point on the spectrum where red turns into violet.

SBG will just say "Red and violet are still just colors. They don't create a new visible spectrum."

[Esquilax]

SBG will just say "Red and violet are still just colors. They don't create a new visible spectrum."

"That color chart was made based on the false assumption of "no god" and is therefore invalid."

The logic of this argument of hers really makes my head spin.

[Zen Badger]

And she still hasn't come up with a plausible reason for why we can see so much universe when it's only 6000 years old.

This one has to be one of the stupider cretinists we have had. And that's saying something.