RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 3:21 pm
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2013 at 3:21 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Do you have a single tree with the stamp of "god"?
The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
|
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 3:21 pm
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2013 at 3:21 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Do you have a single tree with the stamp of "god"?
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 3:25 pm
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 3:30 pm
Is it worth pointing out to our friend that tree rings from one tree are matched and overlapped with those from other, older, ones and so forming an unbroken chain of tree ring history many thousands of years further back in time than YECs claim the Universe has existed?
Actually, probably not so I won't bother.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 3:33 pm
(October 8, 2013 at 3:16 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 8, 2013 at 2:58 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: I don't believe anyone claimed that it did. No - and if you had the slightest clue how and why dendrochronology works, you'd know why your question is absurd. RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 3:47 pm
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2013 at 3:48 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 8, 2013 at 3:33 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: ...... you'd know .... Uhem. We are talking about the biblical literalist kind of moron. (October 8, 2013 at 3:25 pm)Tiberius Wrote:(October 8, 2013 at 3:21 pm)Chuck Wrote: Do you have a single tree with the stamp of "god"?Silly Chuck. It was created, so it must have a creator, and that creator is God. And I thought its creator was shiva's fart. RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 3:50 pm
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 8:52 pm
(October 8, 2013 at 2:48 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Basic definitions and facts have been given to no avail. Do you really think this mouth-breather will draw the correct conclusion from an analogy? No, not really. Quote:I applaud you and anyone else who wishes to continue reasoning with Grace, but you'd be better off jerking off your pets: at least you'd have a little something to show for the effort, and the animal might demonstrate some basic fucking gratitude. As tempting as that sounds, what I'm really trying to do is provoke a response of any kind. This guy just flat out ignores everything I've said. RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 9:38 pm
(October 8, 2013 at 2:36 pm)Ryantology Wrote: SBG will just say "Red and violet are still just colors. They don't create a new visible spectrum."
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 9, 2013 at 1:27 am
(October 8, 2013 at 9:38 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: SBG will just say "Red and violet are still just colors. They don't create a new visible spectrum." "That color chart was made based on the false assumption of "no god" and is therefore invalid." The logic of this argument of hers really makes my head spin.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 9, 2013 at 5:09 am
And she still hasn't come up with a plausible reason for why we can see so much universe when it's only 6000 years old.
This one has to be one of the stupider cretinists we have had. And that's saying something. If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|