Not at all. We are saying he is a scumbag for doing so. Lots of scumbags among the religious it seems.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 16, 2024, 8:59 am
Thread Rating:
|
Ray comfort uses a man's suicide to push evolutionVSgod
|
He's obviously callous about the death. It seems he degraded the cartoonist to a wasted vagabond... but he made a cool arrow pointing to his link. psh... douche bag
Lemonvariable72
Copenhagen School  Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher. RE: Ray comfort uses a man's suicide to push evolutionVSgod
October 11, 2013 at 12:45 am
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2013 at 12:49 am by Lemonvariable72.)
(October 10, 2013 at 11:39 pm)Lion IRC Wrote:(October 10, 2013 at 3:00 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Here is the link here Oh normally I would agree, death can be such a segway however he is not using it as a method of opening discussion, but instead makes a rather crude and generalized remark and then says watch my documentary, which he makes money on.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. 
Hi Everyone!
 (October 10, 2013 at 11:39 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: Whats wrong with using death as a segway to discuss existential issues like...well..you know....whether God and the afterlife exists? That would be absolutely fine. What isn't fine, is using the death of a human being to slander a group of people- Comfort wasn't using this as a jumping off point, but as a way to accuse atheists of having meaningless lives- and to advertise a movie that has nothing to do with the afterlife. It'd be like if I was selling hotdogs, and I did it by filming an ad that was like "christians are pedophiles. Buy some fucking hotdogs!" There's no connection between the discussion being had and the thing the post opened with. Quote:Are we restricted in what we can say and think? WOW. Some "free thought" community. You might note that we aren't trying to get Comfort shut down on this. As I explained to you yesterday, you're allowed to talk like this if you want. You just aren't absolved from criticism if you do. Why is it you think your freedom of speech should make you free from that right from others? 
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!  RE: Ray comfort uses a man's suicide to push evolutionVSgod
October 12, 2013 at 7:45 pm
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2013 at 7:46 pm by Lion IRC.)
(October 11, 2013 at 7:29 am)Esquilax Wrote: There's no connection between the discussion being had and the thing the post opened with. On the contrary, there is a very strong connection between death and AvT. Do you believe in the soul? Heaven and hell? The sanctity of human life? (October 11, 2013 at 7:29 am)Esquilax Wrote: You might note that we aren't trying to get Comfort shut down on this. Who is "we"? Are you the group spokesperson? (October 11, 2013 at 7:29 am)Esquilax Wrote: As I explained to you yesterday, you're allowed to talk like this if you want. You just aren't absolved from criticism if you do. Oh, drats. I was really kinda hoping that nobody on an atheist board would ever say anything critical or abusive to someone like me.  (October 11, 2013 at 7:29 am)Esquilax Wrote: Why is it you think your freedom of speech should make you free from that right from others? Have I got freedom of speech here? REALLY? Oh, good. When are the forum rules getting updated to reflect the new policy?  (October 12, 2013 at 7:45 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: Have I got freedom of speech here? REALLY? Your freedom of speech ends at our freedom to be free of proselytizing dickholes. Besides, our "no preaching" rule is so relaxed that you'd have to be a dumbass not to get around it.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
 (October 12, 2013 at 7:56 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Besides, our "no preaching" rule is so relaxed that you'd have to be a dumbass not to get around it. Has anyone even run afoul of it since we clarified/narrowed the definition? I honestly can't recall it happening - and indeed, you'd have to be a dumbass to not be capable of getting around it. I'll also note that the reason it was changed was to both to clarify the criteria and to allow theists greater latitude to express their position - without giving carte blanche to the ones who come here only to preach damnation without engaging in discussion. That's who the rule is targeting. In other words, the restrictions that are in place are there in order to promote discussion, which is the purpose of this forum.  Quote:Why is it you think your freedom of speech should make you free from that right from others? Because he's a sanctimonious twat. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: header_text.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.freethought-forum.com%2Fforum%2Fimages%2Fheader%2Fheader_text.gif)
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
