Refuting Evolution

[Muslim Scholar]

Ok, I'll bite.

The Burak is not half man, he is a creature similar to a horse
What is your objections on that? can you prove its non-existence????

Yes.

Your go.

Where is that proof?

---

Of course I should select relevant premises

1- If time is infinite, there must be a time in the past where infinite numbers of seconds passed which is not, so time & universe had a start.

Ignores the finite past/infinite future scenario, but this one is basically okay.

2- As the universe was nothing or something static, something (else) must have started it to be time sensitive, we will call it G.

Physics indicates the universe was never absolutely nothing or something static. The most likely natural causes for the universe are that the Big Bang inflated from a previous hot dense state that went back who knows how long; or that it expanded from a fluctuation in the quantum foam. An interesting thing about quantum foam is how closely it resembles certain descriptions of what a creator god would have to be, such as existing necessarily. It looks like quantum foam can't not exist.

This contradicts with being ok with my previous statement
The universe states must be finite as well
So there is a first Universe state
before it, there was no Universe

The main problem with your conclusions is that natural explanations can fit them as well as supernatural ones. So far, quantum foam fits the bill for G, and has the advantage that it's existence can potentially be tested.

Brane theory might qualify as well, but I'm not as up on it as I am on QF.

Somewhat I agree on it, but what do you call nature must fit my model for the creator
Proving God himself is yet to come

[Esquilax]

Where is that proof?

What do you mean? It's been proved!

[Cyberman]

Exactly. I gave just as much proof for the creature's non-existence as MS gave for its existence. Ergo, invoking The Immortal Hitch, I proved it doesn't exist. Go me.

[Muslim Scholar]

Did anybody found the millions and millions of mutated fossils to prove the UN-intelligent evolution?

Or are you still searching in you S***t?

[Esquilax]

You know necroposting is against the rules, right Scholar?

[Lemonvariable72]

We have a saying in Islam that

Quite the nugget of wisdon there, apply it to your god.

Let's look into the other side!!!!!!!!
Non-Beneficial mutations must include:

1. Neutral mutations; which have no good or bad effect
   
2. UN-economical (non-sense) mutations; which have an environmental disadvantage and would be unselected by nature UN-selection (after many generations)
   
3. Slightly Harmful mutations (That should die after many generations)
   
4. Harmful mutations (But don't affect reproduction)
   
5. Fatal mutations
   

To furfill that list look no further then your body
1. Neutral mutations.
Men have nipples that are utterly functionless but cause no impediment.
2. Non sense mutations.
Your laryngeal nerve runs from your brain stem, down and around your heart and back up to your larynx.
3. Slightly harmful mutations
Look down and see where your balls are. The painful part of your body is hanging right in front, for anyone to hit and potentially damage reproductive viability.
4. Harmful Mutations (that do not effect reproduction).
Instead of running through the gamut of potential genetic disorders, I will simply point to your appendix, which later life often becomes infected and in the age before antibiotic would often kill you.
5. Fatal mutations.
Wisdom teeth. Your is too small for them and they often become painful and infected when growing in. Before modern medicine this killed by the millions.

Evolutionists brained washed you by claiming that all non-beneficial mutations are Fatal ones, in other words "Don't look for them

HOLY Freudian slip much?

---

Did anybody found the millions and millions of mutated fossils to prove the UN-intelligent evolution?

Or are you still searching in you S***t?

You want one?
Here is a prime example
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiktaalik

[Muslim Scholar]

We have a saying in Islam that

Quite the nugget of wisdon there, apply it to your god.

Let's look into the other side!!!!!!!!
Non-Beneficial mutations must include:

1. Neutral mutations; which have no good or bad effect
   
2. UN-economical (non-sense) mutations; which have an environmental disadvantage and would be unselected by nature UN-selection (after many generations)
   
3. Slightly Harmful mutations (That should die after many generations)
   
4. Harmful mutations (But don't affect reproduction)
   
5. Fatal mutations
   

To furfill that list look no further then your body
1. Neutral mutations.
Men have nipples that are utterly functionless but cause no impediment

I don't mean that, I mean ridiculous, nonsense that may in the future become good or bad
for example a mutated eye in yous as*

[pocaracas]

How about a nose on your forehead?

[Sejanus]

-blissful silence-

[Lemonvariable72]

Quite the nugget of wisdon there, apply it to your god.
To furfill that list look no further then your body
1. Neutral mutations.
Men have nipples that are utterly functionless but cause no impediment

I don't mean that, I mean ridiculous, nonsense that may in the future become good or bad
for example a mutated eye in yous as*

Well I took neutral to mean mutations that are neither bonuses or hindrance but merely there. That is a example that occurs in everyone. Another good example is women's breasts as why should a women develop mammary glands before pregnancy when no other mammal does this. Howeveryou could try rreading the other examples I give you.