Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 2, 2024, 6:57 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
#21
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
(November 12, 2013 at 7:07 pm)Chas Wrote:
(November 12, 2013 at 6:34 pm)Psykhronic Wrote: Why would I give a shit if someone wants to remove a healthy kidney? Hell, the doctor could even save it for a transplant.

Or have with some fava beans and a nice chianti.

thuthuthuthuthuthuthuh...

Seriously, John, that's a really crappy analogy. But yes, if someone, for some strange reason thought they needed one of their kidneys removed, then they should have the right to do it providing they had the money and could find a doctor willing to perform such a useless operation. Unless that kidney is going toward a transplant, I don't think any doctor would perform it and anyone asking for it would probably receive a mental health screening.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#22
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
(November 12, 2013 at 7:21 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: Seriously, John, that's a really crappy analogy.

Crappy analogies is all they have.
Reply
#23
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
(November 12, 2013 at 6:28 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: If your abortion on-demand argument is about personal autonomy you MUST equally support the right of a person to have their $100,000 healthy kidney removed - their body, their choice.

You do realize that people can and do have healthy kidneys voluntarily removed for transplant, yes? Somewhat long story, I volunteered one of mine to my father - it was declined, not because of ethics, not because the procedure isn't done, but because he was not a candidate for transplant (his kidney failure was ultimately reversible, and other mitigating factors did not allow him to undergo such a procedure).
Reply
#24
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
I will keep making this point: prohibiting access to safe and legal abortions will not end abortion. Women of education and means will go elsewhere. The only women you will be controlling are poor and uneducated women- and that's pretty shitty. Forced reproduction is slavery, and the slaves will be who they have always been: poor women. Way to go.
Reply
#25
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
Quote:The only women you will be controlling are poor and uneducated women-

The goal of religion everywhere. IF there is one thing that all of the angry desert god horseshit religions agree upon it is that women need controlling. This is proof, if any were needed, that religion was created by men who are ashamed of their little dicks.
Reply
#26
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
(November 12, 2013 at 6:28 pm)Lion IRC Wrote: If your abortion on-demand argument is about personal autonomy you MUST equally support the right of a person to have their $100,000 healthy kidney removed - their body, their choice.

Why would you expect us to blanch at that? So long as it's consensual, what's the issue?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#27
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
Can a woman rent out her uterus to the highest bidder?
Can she sell her unborn baby?
How about photos of her unborn babies genitals? Can she sell those?

...I'm wondering what WOULD make you blanch.
Money for body parts might not bother libertarian capitalism but I find it disgusting!
Reply
#28
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
(November 13, 2013 at 2:59 am)Lion IRC Wrote: Can a woman rent out her uterus to the highest bidder?

It's called surrogacy, and sometimes yes, money is involved. What's the issue?

Quote:Can she sell her unborn baby?

Adoption, and yes, sometimes money changes hands there too. Or are you talking about the fetus?

Quote:How about photos of her unborn babies genitals? Can she sell those?

Isn't that just a sonogram? Why would anyone want to buy those? Of course, one could make the argument that this comes under current child pornography laws and, rightly, I'd not want to encourage that kind of criminal activity.

Quote:...I'm wondering what WOULD make you blanch.
Money for body parts might not bother libertarian capitalism but I find it disgusting!

And perhaps you've considered the possibility that your immediate revulsion, or the unthinking disgust reactions of any person, might not weigh up against an actual consideration of the consequences? Why are you placing so much worth in going with your gut, over being rational?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#29
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
(November 12, 2013 at 10:08 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:The only women you will be controlling are poor and uneducated women-

The goal of religion everywhere. IF there is one thing that all of the angry desert god horseshit religions agree upon it is that women need controlling. This is proof, if any were needed, that religion was created by men who are ashamed of their little dicks.

Quote:Is ó mhnáib do·gabar rath nó amhrath.
It is from women that fortune comes, good or bad.

Spoken in the council of the Túatha Dé Danann by Midir Mongbuide, son of the Dagda, in "Acallam na Senórach" (408-09).
{image: Ramha-Palmer http://tinyurl.com/kv55qxd — wit' scurvy sea dogs Karen Valli}
[Image: 1422525_451272254982999_1520832371_n.jpg]

Perhaps this is why?
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply
#30
RE: The Supreme CourtTells Oklahoma to Fuck Off
Wow, such important subjects.
[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Innocence is not enough for the Supreme Court... Rev. Rye 7 727 May 27, 2022 at 6:20 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  What happens if you "tell" a police to f**k off? Freedom of speech? Duty 16 1502 April 17, 2022 at 9:35 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Why you should fear Trump's pick for Supreme Court Judge Silver 75 5915 October 31, 2020 at 10:52 am
Last Post: TaraJo
  Amy Coney Barnett officially confirmed as Supreme Court Justice Rev. Rye 33 3259 October 28, 2020 at 3:01 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Fuck them BrokenQuill92 1 500 October 27, 2020 at 12:38 am
Last Post: Sal
  Expanding The Supreme Court onlinebiker 94 6440 September 30, 2020 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Secular Elf
  UK Supreme Court: Suspending Parliament was unlawful zebo-the-fat 6 823 September 25, 2019 at 1:16 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Theresa May seen off the coast of Blackpool Cod 0 376 March 11, 2019 at 10:10 am
Last Post: Cod
  What is that fat Orange fuck hiding ? GODZILLA 35 3870 February 18, 2019 at 12:41 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Judge Tells The WLB to Go Fuck Himself Minimalist 0 935 October 25, 2018 at 5:18 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)