Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 17, 2024, 9:16 pm
Thread Rating:
Objective Morality, Anyone?
|
1 + 1 = 2. Objective and not opinion. Right?
(March 19, 2014 at 8:56 am)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:(March 19, 2014 at 8:53 am)tor Wrote: 1 + 1 = 2. Objective and not opinion. Right? Yeah and drinking battery acid is objectivally unhealthy and burning people alive is objectivally wrong. (March 19, 2014 at 8:58 am)tor Wrote: Yeah and drinking battery acid is objectivally unhealthy and burning people alive is objectivally wrong.Yes, but good health is not objectively important, and you have not yet actually demonstrated that something is objectively wrong with burning people alive. I really don't want to insult you, but I don't think you know what "objective" means in relation to "subjective." It does not mean "Commonly held among most people." RE: Objective Morality, Anyone?
March 19, 2014 at 9:09 am
(This post was last modified: March 19, 2014 at 9:11 am by Mudhammam.)
That's your argument? You have defined burning people as objectively wrong but you haven't demonstrated why this is objectively true for anyone else. Numbers, on the other hand, simply represent the properties of external objects. Those external properties don't change when you fail to order them numerically.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
(March 19, 2014 at 9:09 am)bennyboy Wrote:(March 19, 2014 at 8:58 am)tor Wrote: Yeah and drinking battery acid is objectivally unhealthy and burning people alive is objectivally wrong.Yes, but good health is not objectively important, and you have not yet actually demonstrated that something is objectively wrong with burning people alive. I really don't want to insult you, but I don't think you know what "objective" means in relation to "subjective." It does not mean "Commonly held among most people." What does it mean then? I think burning people alive is wrong even if nobody agrees with me. Truth is independent from what opinions of the majority. Also morality is situational. It would be objectively immoral for me to shoot bennyboy in the head just like that but it would not be immoral for me to shoot bennyboy in the head if he is running towards me with axe with intention to chop me into pieces. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)