Posts: 29631
Threads: 116
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 5:10 pm
(April 30, 2014 at 1:44 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (April 30, 2014 at 12:54 am)whateverist Wrote:
But since you have the gall, let me just say that your god is a cock sucking, mother fucker. I encourage him to strike me down now to defend you .. yeah, right.
I prayed that the Lord may have forgiveness and mercy on you.
So, in other words, you did basically nothing.
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 5:27 pm
(This post was last modified: April 30, 2014 at 5:28 pm by Revelation777.)
(April 30, 2014 at 5:10 pm)rasetsu Wrote: (April 30, 2014 at 1:44 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I prayed that the Lord may have forgiveness and mercy on you.
So, in other words, you did basically nothing.
no, no, no...it is powerful communication
(April 30, 2014 at 1:37 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: (April 30, 2014 at 1:34 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: The Lord is teaching me to be patient, longsuffering, forgiving, and to develop a thicker skin.
In other words, "I got my ass handed to me so thoroughly in the first thread that now I'm not so sure my other six arguments are as good as I thought, so I'll stall."
this is not a competition...rather, a matter of eternal significance
Posts: 28389
Threads: 226
Joined: March 24, 2014
Reputation:
185
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 5:29 pm
(April 30, 2014 at 5:27 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (April 30, 2014 at 5:10 pm)rasetsu Wrote: So, in other words, you did basically nothing.
no, no, no...it is powerful communication
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21...rself.html
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay
0/10
Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Posts: 658
Threads: 25
Joined: February 13, 2014
Reputation:
3
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 5:30 pm
(This post was last modified: April 30, 2014 at 5:33 pm by Revelation777.)
(April 29, 2014 at 10:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: (April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
Translation: I can't keep up the shuck and jive in a one on one debate.
Do you honestly think there is anyone here who isn't on to your bullshit (besides you, that is)?
huh?
(April 29, 2014 at 10:58 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: (April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
But the masses have a unified voice saying you are unappealing. Do you not think your message would be more concise and palatable if there were one chain of responses rather than 50?
Oh, if there be but one that would believe, it'd be so worth it!
(April 30, 2014 at 10:50 am)Esquilax Wrote: (April 30, 2014 at 10:46 am)Revelation777 Wrote: My goal is to present 7 arguments. After that I'll reconsider your offer.
So hurry up and post number two, I could do with some fodder.
Fodder - no; meat -yes.
Posts: 35277
Threads: 204
Joined: August 13, 2012
Reputation:
146
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 5:45 pm
(April 30, 2014 at 5:30 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (April 29, 2014 at 10:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Translation: I can't keep up the shuck and jive in a one on one debate.
Do you honestly think there is anyone here who isn't on to your bullshit (besides you, that is)?
huh?
(April 29, 2014 at 10:58 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: But the masses have a unified voice saying you are unappealing. Do you not think your message would be more concise and palatable if there were one chain of responses rather than 50?
Oh, if there be but one that would believe, it'd be so worth it!
(April 30, 2014 at 10:50 am)Esquilax Wrote: So hurry up and post number two, I could do with some fodder.
Fodder - no; meat -yes.
Won't happen. We've all heard the claims, appeals, and threats before.
They have no meaning for us.
They're nonsense.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
Posts: 30974
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 5:51 pm
(April 30, 2014 at 5:30 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: (April 29, 2014 at 10:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Translation: I can't keep up the shuck and jive in a one on one debate.
Do you honestly think there is anyone here who isn't on to your bullshit (besides you, that is)?
huh?
Exactly.
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 5:53 pm
^^ So perfect. That tasted good.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 8:49 pm
(April 29, 2014 at 7:54 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: My wife thinks I am spending too much time on this site. Good thing she didn't ask to see the results of your efforts so far.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Suggested Rule
May 1, 2014 at 7:48 am
(April 29, 2014 at 7:54 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: My wife thinks I am spending too much time on this site.
Doesn't the bible teach your wife to submit to you?
Who care what she thinks, she doesn't have a penis.
Posts: 7568
Threads: 20
Joined: July 26, 2013
Reputation:
54
RE: Suggested Rule
May 1, 2014 at 8:12 am
(April 30, 2014 at 5:27 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: this is not a competition...rather, a matter of eternal significance
In that case, your failure thus far will resound through the ages. What does the wife think of the quality of your witness up to this point? Are you her Knight of Faith, or is she the brains in the outfit?
|