Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 5:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Suggested Rule
RE: Suggested Rule
(April 30, 2014 at 1:44 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:
(April 30, 2014 at 12:54 am)whateverist Wrote:


But since you have the gall, let me just say that your god is a cock sucking, mother fucker. I encourage him to strike me down now to defend you .. yeah, right.



I prayed that the Lord may have forgiveness and mercy on you.

So, in other words, you did basically nothing.

[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
RE: Suggested Rule
(April 30, 2014 at 5:10 pm)rasetsu Wrote:
(April 30, 2014 at 1:44 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I prayed that the Lord may have forgiveness and mercy on you.

So, in other words, you did basically nothing.


no, no, no...it is powerful communication

(April 30, 2014 at 1:37 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:
(April 30, 2014 at 1:34 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: The Lord is teaching me to be patient, longsuffering, forgiving, and to develop a thicker skin.

In other words, "I got my ass handed to me so thoroughly in the first thread that now I'm not so sure my other six arguments are as good as I thought, so I'll stall."

this is not a competition...rather, a matter of eternal significance
Reply
RE: Suggested Rule
(April 30, 2014 at 5:27 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:
(April 30, 2014 at 5:10 pm)rasetsu Wrote: So, in other words, you did basically nothing.


no, no, no...it is powerful communication

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21...rself.html
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
RE: Suggested Rule
(April 29, 2014 at 10:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.

Translation: I can't keep up the shuck and jive in a one on one debate.

Do you honestly think there is anyone here who isn't on to your bullshit (besides you, that is)?

huh?Huh

(April 29, 2014 at 10:58 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:
(April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.

But the masses have a unified voice saying you are unappealing. Do you not think your message would be more concise and palatable if there were one chain of responses rather than 50?

Oh, if there be but one that would believe, it'd be so worth it!Clap Clap

(April 30, 2014 at 10:50 am)Esquilax Wrote:
(April 30, 2014 at 10:46 am)Revelation777 Wrote: My goal is to present 7 arguments. After that I'll reconsider your offer.

So hurry up and post number two, I could do with some fodder. Tongue

Fodder - no; meat -yes.
Reply
RE: Suggested Rule
(April 30, 2014 at 5:30 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:
(April 29, 2014 at 10:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Translation: I can't keep up the shuck and jive in a one on one debate.

Do you honestly think there is anyone here who isn't on to your bullshit (besides you, that is)?

huh?Huh

(April 29, 2014 at 10:58 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: But the masses have a unified voice saying you are unappealing. Do you not think your message would be more concise and palatable if there were one chain of responses rather than 50?

Oh, if there be but one that would believe, it'd be so worth it!Clap Clap

(April 30, 2014 at 10:50 am)Esquilax Wrote: So hurry up and post number two, I could do with some fodder. Tongue

Fodder - no; meat -yes.

Won't happen. We've all heard the claims, appeals, and threats before.

They have no meaning for us.

They're nonsense.

Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
RE: Suggested Rule
(April 30, 2014 at 5:30 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:
(April 29, 2014 at 10:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Translation: I can't keep up the shuck and jive in a one on one debate.

Do you honestly think there is anyone here who isn't on to your bullshit (besides you, that is)?

huh?Huh

Exactly.
Reply
RE: Suggested Rule
^^ So perfect. That tasted good.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
RE: Suggested Rule
(April 29, 2014 at 7:54 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: My wife thinks I am spending too much time on this site.
Good thing she didn't ask to see the results of your efforts so far.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
RE: Suggested Rule
(April 29, 2014 at 7:54 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: My wife thinks I am spending too much time on this site.

Doesn't the bible teach your wife to submit to you?

Who care what she thinks, she doesn't have a penis.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply
RE: Suggested Rule
(April 30, 2014 at 5:27 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: this is not a competition...rather, a matter of eternal significance

In that case, your failure thus far will resound through the ages. What does the wife think of the quality of your witness up to this point? Are you her Knight of Faith, or is she the brains in the outfit?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Eliminate Automatic Insertion of Horizontal Rule Neo-Scholastic 21 3578 November 29, 2017 at 11:10 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Question about latest forum rule Catholic_Lady 29 5771 November 14, 2017 at 4:27 pm
Last Post: Tiberius
  Alternative to "click bait" rule: block threads robvalue 40 7385 February 6, 2017 at 1:38 am
Last Post: rexbeccarox
  Trolling rule Excited Penguin 61 8838 November 19, 2016 at 8:40 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  R'lyeh rule Excited Penguin 54 7240 February 17, 2016 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Report System Abuse Rule Excited Penguin 20 4101 February 15, 2016 at 12:21 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  30/30 Rule Pyrrho 31 8956 February 22, 2015 at 2:21 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Am I breaking a forum rule? Something completely different 2 2353 August 20, 2013 at 11:44 am
Last Post: CleanShavenJesus
  [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action Shell B 94 46819 June 2, 2012 at 1:27 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet
  A forum rule Emporion 10 5429 August 5, 2011 at 7:48 am
Last Post: Napoléon



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)