Posts: 1065
Threads: 6
Joined: June 19, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 5:33 pm
(October 2, 2014 at 5:21 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Inaccurate implies wrong..
So which is it? Are the older measurements inaccurate? Or are all the measurements viable based on the environment of the DNA?
Not-as-accurate is not inaccurate. The older measurements have a bigger error compared to the newer ones, and you have to take into account on what environments the DNA is in.
It is amazing on how hard it is for you to get these concepts.
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 5:40 pm
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2014 at 5:46 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(October 2, 2014 at 5:33 pm)Surgenator Wrote: (October 2, 2014 at 5:21 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Inaccurate implies wrong..
So which is it? Are the older measurements inaccurate? Or are all the measurements viable based on the environment of the DNA?
Not-as-accurate is not inaccurate. The older measurements have a bigger error compared to the newer ones, and you have to take into account on what environments the DNA is in.
It is amazing on how hard it is for you to get these concepts.
Now you want to argue semantics?
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inaccurate
Quote:in·ac·cu·rate
adjective \-ˈa-kyə-rət, -k(ə-)rət\
: not correct or exact : having a mistake or error : not accurate
The "As" just means "to the same degree"
so older data not being "as accurate" to the same degree as newer data would make older data inaccurate, correct?
what's hard for me to get, is a straight answer...
Posts: 1065
Threads: 6
Joined: June 19, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 5:50 pm
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2014 at 6:08 pm by Surgenator.)
It is still amazing on how hard it is for you to get these concepts.
I showed that the most common ratio is 34/23.7 not 34/21. So do you retract your claim?
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 6:39 pm
HOLY SHIT THIS THREAD IS LONGER THEN UNITY MEGA THREAD ON THE UBUNTU FORUMS BACK IN THE DAY!!
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 6:45 pm
Funny, isn't it? When it first appeared I remember thinking it sounded like the kind of satire that the Daily show or SNL might make of the kinds of posts we get on the subject. But there was snowflake standing behind it, always with a straight face. If he really was poe'ing us he deserves a medal for his endurance.
Posts: 7140
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 7:07 pm
(October 2, 2014 at 4:49 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: In what world does newer more accurate data, not make the older less accurate data obsolete? The new data incorporates the old, adding it to a larger and more comprehensive data set. The old data is not wrong and it is not inaccurate, therefore not obsolete. The new data is more accurate.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 7:31 pm
(October 2, 2014 at 7:07 pm)Tonus Wrote: (October 2, 2014 at 4:49 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: In what world does newer more accurate data, not make the older less accurate data obsolete? The new data incorporates the old, adding it to a larger and more comprehensive data set. The old data is not wrong and it is not inaccurate, therefore not obsolete. The new data is more accurate.
You really should consider a career in politics.
Posts: 3634
Threads: 20
Joined: July 20, 2011
Reputation:
47
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 7:44 pm
(This post was last modified: October 2, 2014 at 7:52 pm by Simon Moon.)
(October 2, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You really should consider a career in politics.
Newton's theories were not thrown out when Einstein's explained the facts better. Nor were Einstein's theories thrown out when QM explained some of the facts better.
We fly space craft all over the solar system, with precision, using Newton's laws, despite the fact that they are not completely accurate and do not take relativity into account.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
Posts: 3837
Threads: 197
Joined: August 28, 2013
Reputation:
38
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 7:54 pm
(October 2, 2014 at 6:45 pm)whateverist Wrote: Funny, isn't it? When it first appeared I remember thinking it sounded like the kind of satire that the Daily show or SNL might make of the kinds of posts we get on the subject. But there was snowflake standing behind it, always with a straight face. If he really was poe'ing us he deserves a medal for his endurance.
Yes indeed, but I doubt they are poe's most of the time. This guy makes me wonder though.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Posts: 4738
Threads: 7
Joined: October 17, 2013
Reputation:
15
RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
October 2, 2014 at 8:01 pm
(October 2, 2014 at 7:44 pm)Simon Moon Wrote: (October 2, 2014 at 7:31 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You really should consider a career in politics.
Newton's theories were not thrown out when Einstein's explained the facts better. Nor were Einstein's theories thrown out when QM explained some of the facts better.
We fly space craft all over the solar system, with precision, using Newton's laws, despite the fact that they are not completely accurate and do not take relativity into account.
were not talking quantum theories here, were talking about simple measurements.
|
