Let's examine this evidence then 
1. Opening statement
"There is undeniable scientific evidence today for the afterlife." (Bare assertion)
"I am a former practicing attorney-at-law formally qualified in a number of university disciplines." (And now you're a shit writer that nobody gives a fuck about - You obviously sucked at the decent job you had)
I am also an open-minded skeptic. (Lie)
Look at this
"a great body of evidence which, taken as a whole, absolutely and unqualifiedly proves the case for the afterlife." (Absolute proof)
Then a contradiction:
"I will not be arguing that the objective evidence has high probative value. Nor am I suggesting that this evidence be accepted beyond reasonable doubt." (Not a high probability, not beyond reasonable doubt)
And then reverts to his original position:
"I am stating that the evidence taken as a whole constitutes overwhelming and irrefutable proof for the existence of the afterlife." (Irrefutable proof)
"There have been millions of pages written about psychic phenomena and scientific research into the afterlife." (Big fucking deal, millions of bad arguments do not amount to one good argument)
I have very carefully selected aspects of psychic research and afterlife knowledge that would constitute objective evidence
AND THE CLINCHER:
"I have very carefully selected aspects of psychic research and afterlife knowledge that would constitute objective evidence" (Cherry picking)
"When the objective evidence, near death experiences, out of body experiences, after-death contacts.." (All SUBJECTIVE)
"voices on tape, psychic laboratory experiments, the best mediums, the Cross Correspondences, the Scole Experiment, proxy sittings, poltergeists and all of the other evidence contained in this work is seen collectively, the case for survival after death is absolutely stunning and irrefutable." (Bullshit)
Then there are a bunch of arguments from authority by some general practitioners and psychologists.
"The Western world has known for a couple of thousand years that under certain circumstances it is possible for Etherians (spirits from the afterlife also known as the Etheric realm) to temporarily appear as solid flesh and blood beings, through the agency of gifted materialization mediums." (LOL)
Lots of arguments from personal experience and introspection, more arguments from authority.
"The experiment took place in a private home at Castle Cove, Sydney. Along with the medium, David Thompson, were a total of 9 people (3 female and 6 male all professional people including a lawyer, an accountant and a media professional- all open minded skeptics)." (Sample size is pathetic).
"Thirty minutes prior to the beginning of the séance we set in motion an MP3 recorder with a very sensitive microphone which recorded the entire 90 minute session." (Wait for it...)
"A chair was placed behind the door underneath the handle for added security." (Wait for it....)
"The medium had a black gag tied securely around his head through his open mouth preventing him from making any more than muffled sounds. " (Lol almost there..)
"The séance experiment took place in total darkness" (almost...)
"The séance experiment began with one of the sitters offering a short prayer followed by the playing of the hymn “Jerusalem”... "Soon afterwards we heard very distinct fairly heavy breathing and the loud clear voice of ‘William’ the spirit “master of ceremonies” who welcomed us all, talking slowly, using a low pitched resonant voice"
" William, the control, welcomed everyone to the circle and introduced us to some spectacular movements of the trumpet."
"We could feel a rush of air as it passed us." (Really paranormal...)
You went into a dark room and were conned by someone with a fucking glowing piece of cardboard and a deep voice, you fucking retard.
Read the rest guys, it's fucking hilarious.
Thankyou Ackmails, i haven't laughed that hard in AGES.
1. Opening statement
"There is undeniable scientific evidence today for the afterlife." (Bare assertion)
"I am a former practicing attorney-at-law formally qualified in a number of university disciplines." (And now you're a shit writer that nobody gives a fuck about - You obviously sucked at the decent job you had)
I am also an open-minded skeptic. (Lie)
Look at this
"a great body of evidence which, taken as a whole, absolutely and unqualifiedly proves the case for the afterlife." (Absolute proof)
Then a contradiction:
"I will not be arguing that the objective evidence has high probative value. Nor am I suggesting that this evidence be accepted beyond reasonable doubt." (Not a high probability, not beyond reasonable doubt)
And then reverts to his original position:
"I am stating that the evidence taken as a whole constitutes overwhelming and irrefutable proof for the existence of the afterlife." (Irrefutable proof)
"There have been millions of pages written about psychic phenomena and scientific research into the afterlife." (Big fucking deal, millions of bad arguments do not amount to one good argument)
I have very carefully selected aspects of psychic research and afterlife knowledge that would constitute objective evidence
AND THE CLINCHER:
"I have very carefully selected aspects of psychic research and afterlife knowledge that would constitute objective evidence" (Cherry picking)
"When the objective evidence, near death experiences, out of body experiences, after-death contacts.." (All SUBJECTIVE)
"voices on tape, psychic laboratory experiments, the best mediums, the Cross Correspondences, the Scole Experiment, proxy sittings, poltergeists and all of the other evidence contained in this work is seen collectively, the case for survival after death is absolutely stunning and irrefutable." (Bullshit)
Then there are a bunch of arguments from authority by some general practitioners and psychologists.
"The Western world has known for a couple of thousand years that under certain circumstances it is possible for Etherians (spirits from the afterlife also known as the Etheric realm) to temporarily appear as solid flesh and blood beings, through the agency of gifted materialization mediums." (LOL)
Lots of arguments from personal experience and introspection, more arguments from authority.
"The experiment took place in a private home at Castle Cove, Sydney. Along with the medium, David Thompson, were a total of 9 people (3 female and 6 male all professional people including a lawyer, an accountant and a media professional- all open minded skeptics)." (Sample size is pathetic).
"Thirty minutes prior to the beginning of the séance we set in motion an MP3 recorder with a very sensitive microphone which recorded the entire 90 minute session." (Wait for it...)
"A chair was placed behind the door underneath the handle for added security." (Wait for it....)
"The medium had a black gag tied securely around his head through his open mouth preventing him from making any more than muffled sounds. " (Lol almost there..)
"The séance experiment took place in total darkness" (almost...)
"The séance experiment began with one of the sitters offering a short prayer followed by the playing of the hymn “Jerusalem”... "Soon afterwards we heard very distinct fairly heavy breathing and the loud clear voice of ‘William’ the spirit “master of ceremonies” who welcomed us all, talking slowly, using a low pitched resonant voice"
" William, the control, welcomed everyone to the circle and introduced us to some spectacular movements of the trumpet."
"We could feel a rush of air as it passed us." (Really paranormal...)
You went into a dark room and were conned by someone with a fucking glowing piece of cardboard and a deep voice, you fucking retard.
Read the rest guys, it's fucking hilarious.
Thankyou Ackmails, i haven't laughed that hard in AGES.
.
hock:
You can deny the truth but you can't destroy it.
