Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 29, 2024, 4:28 am

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 8, 2015 at 7:09 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 8, 2015 at 7:08 pm)IATIA Wrote: These 'professionals' are just as biased as any theist.  They have already decided what they believe before researching.  pocaracas has a valid point, but today's theists just ignore the fact that their religion is just a plagiarism of of the older religions.

Would that be true of the atheist and agnostic scholars of the NT, also?

That would be true of anyone that believes the NT or OT is original work. Atheists and agnostics have their fair share of idiots, it is not a domain owned solely by theists.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 8, 2015 at 7:08 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 8, 2015 at 7:03 pm)Easy Guns Wrote: I think the point is that any Tom, Dick or Harry can write a fun story about super mystical things.

Just because someone wrote a nice story, doesn't mean anything in that story actually happened.

Unless you believe that your Jesus wasn't the only performer of miracles and there have been many gods running around doing fantastic things?

Either they're all credible, or none of them are. You can't have it both ways, Randy.

Let me get this straight...you're arguing that stories from Greek mythology are JUST AS CREDIBLE as the New Testament?

I asked you a question, Randy.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 8, 2015 at 7:22 pm)Easy Guns Wrote:
(July 8, 2015 at 7:08 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Let me get this straight...you're arguing that stories from Greek mythology are JUST AS CREDIBLE as the New Testament?

I asked you a question, Randy.

I think that genuine miracles could happen among non-Christians and that this would still be compatible with Christians beliefs and claims.

There is still only one God, and He loves ALL people, Easy, so I have no problem with Him deciding to raise a dead person or heal a sick child in a miraculous way.

He's taking all of us, even you, where we're at and trying to draw us closer to Himself.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 8, 2015 at 7:08 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Let me get this straight...you're arguing that stories from Greek mythology are JUST AS CREDIBLE as the New Testament?

Absolutely. And not just Greek mythology. All the stories of ancient gods are just as credible. They are written down (some in stone) and have eyewitnesses. What more do you need?
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 8, 2015 at 7:29 pm)IATIA Wrote:
(July 8, 2015 at 7:08 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Let me get this straight...you're arguing that stories from Greek mythology are JUST AS CREDIBLE as the New Testament?

Absolutely.  And not just Greek mythology.  All the stories of ancient gods are just as credible.  They are written down (some in stone) and have eyewitnesses.  What more do you need?

Careful analysis of the claims.

If there were any real credibility, Horus, Osiris, Zeus and all the others would still be rock stars.

But they aren't, are they? [Image: no.gif]
Reply
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 8, 2015 at 7:28 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 8, 2015 at 7:22 pm)Easy Guns Wrote: I asked you a question, Randy.

I think that genuine miracles could happen among non-Christians and that this would still be compatible with Christians beliefs and claims.

There is still only one God, and He loves ALL people, Easy, so I have no problem with Him deciding to raise a dead person or heal a sick child in a miraculous way.

He's taking all of us, even you, where we're at and trying to draw us closer to Himself.

Many teachings and writings throughout human history depict gods and messiahs very different from yours performing various fantastic and supernatural things.

The question was, do you believe these gods exist(ed) or not?
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 8, 2015 at 7:32 pm)Easy Guns Wrote:
(July 8, 2015 at 7:28 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: I think that genuine miracles could happen among non-Christians and that this would still be compatible with Christians beliefs and claims.

There is still only one God, and He loves ALL people, Easy, so I have no problem with Him deciding to raise a dead person or heal a sick child in a miraculous way.

He's taking all of us, even you, where we're at and trying to draw us closer to Himself.

Many teachings and writings throughout human history depict gods and messiahs very different from yours performing various fantastic and supernatural things.

The question was, do you believe these gods exist(ed) or not?

And I answered appropriately.

No, the gods themselves did not exist if they were not identified as a single creator God; they were attempts at understanding, and the charge of "God of the gaps" would rightly be applied to those efforts.

However, if and when people acknowledged a single creator of all that exists, then they were worshipping the true God and not images and idols. Muslims and Jews, for example, worship the true God even though they do not recognize the Trinity.

Throughout the course of human history, the one, true creator God has revealed Himself to mankind in various ways - which may include the performance of miracles even among those peoples who do not really know Him.
Reply
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 8, 2015 at 7:31 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 8, 2015 at 7:29 pm)IATIA Wrote: Absolutely.  And not just Greek mythology.  All the stories of ancient gods are just as credible.  They are written down (some in stone) and have eyewitnesses.  What more do you need?

Careful analysis of the claims.

If there were any real credibility, Horus, Osiris, Zeus and all the others would still be rock stars.

But they aren't, are they? [Image: no.gif]

I suppose murdering everyone who didn't follow the Christian Faith had nothing to do with that. [emoji106]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Quote:Guess which one I'm going to enjoy quoting most? [Image: cool.gif]

You'll be jerking off to both.  Wankers like you always do.
Reply
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 8, 2015 at 7:39 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 8, 2015 at 7:32 pm)Easy Guns Wrote: Many teachings and writings throughout human history depict gods and messiahs very different from yours performing various fantastic and supernatural things.

The question was, do you believe these gods exist(ed) or not?

And I answered appropriately.

No, the gods themselves did not exist if they were not identified as a single creator God; they were attempts at understanding, and the charge of "God of the gaps" would rightly be applied to those efforts.

However, if and when people acknowledged a single creator of all that exists, then they were worshipping the true God and not images and idols. Muslims and Jews, for example, worship the true God even though they do not recognize the Trinity.

Throughout the course of human history, the one, true creator God has revealed Himself to mankind in various ways - which may include the performance of miracles even among those peoples who do not really know Him.

So the stories of pagan gods impregnating women so that their seed could rule on Earth is really just your god being a perv?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 2995 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 7048 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 16889 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 16143 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 12215 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 38953 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 26201 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 18777 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 346259 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7400 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)